DrBlueBob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2008
- Messages
- 6,686
- Team supported
- Need you ask?
Pretence?"The Prevents task force, the Prevents task force, it's called Prevents."
Anyone any idea what the task force is called.
Pretence?"The Prevents task force, the Prevents task force, it's called Prevents."
Anyone any idea what the task force is called.
This is over my head, I must confess. Did something happen?Talking of drugs, do you reckon Trump is nailing the gear?
A blinder in terms of getting the information in his book out to the public; by going after statements claiming they're classified, the administration would be admitting to them being true.Bolton playing a blinder here.
Drop a copy of your book to the press before planned release. They naturally go straight for the spoilers. Shitehouse go to court to block it demanding a hearing on Friday. By then most of the book has already been blurbed by the press the judge can’t stop something being published that’s already out in the public domain.
Some of the allegations made make Ukraine look like a bun fight.
A blinder in terms of getting the information in his book out to the public; by going after statements claiming they're classified, the administration would be admitting to them being true.
However, any and all information he had could and should have been public months ago.
The sales will be hit by his cowardice at not speaking up when it mattered. Especially as it's leaked; there will be a conscious effort to leak the information of his book online. Had he testified he'd be sitting on a goldmine right now with a book deal.
He not only shit the bed, he wiped his arse all over it like he's Gary Linekar.
Bolton refused to testify at the impeachment hearings unless his testimony was given prime time airing. He didn't have to be subpoenaed yet threatened to sue if he was.I don’t think he gives a fuck if it sells or not. Sadly with any other President would resign. This **** would start WW3 to win an election and stay in power.
The US news coverage has all sides agreeing about Bolton in one way.
Faux/OANN are calling him a lying ****.
MSNBC/CNN are calling him an Uber conservative evil ****.
$2,000,000 and rising.Bolton refused to testify at the impeachment hearings unless his testimony was given prime time airing. He didn't have to be subpoenaed yet threatened to sue if he was.
He cares very much about his book selling.
As damming as this information will be, Bolton's a ****.
Inside vs outside, masks vs no masks, rubbing shoulders vs choosing one’s social distance, idiots vs righteous indignation?This is an unpopular take but I don’t see how you can justify a protest but not a rally. The mass protests are a green light for him to have his rallies.
The reason I say this is because I’ve just seen a CNN reporter (J.Acosta) asking the WH press sec if he’ll take responsibility if people get sick, meanwhile, his network has advocated these gatherings. Campaigning for racial justice is clearly a more worthy cause then his rallies but for a tv network to suddenly change it’s position and care about the impacts of covid-19 from mass gatherings seems remarkably disingenuous.
If you read the WaPo article I posted, they can’t block it (and the courts wouldn’t block it).Bolton playing a blinder here.
Drop a copy of your book to the press before planned release. They naturally go straight for the spoilers. Shitehouse go to court to block it demanding a hearing on Friday. By then most of the book has already been blurbed by the press the judge can’t stop something being published that’s already out in the public domain.
Some of the allegations made make Ukraine look like a bun fight.
That’s bollocks.Bolton refused to testify at the impeachment hearings unless his testimony was given prime time airing.
Yet your response is Chuck full of personal opinion. And somehow that is getting likes. We truly are at the end of Civilization when someone who's response is riddled with opinion, thinks someone who is simply pointing out understandable facts has said something 'embarrassing.'
.
This is over my head, I must confess. Did something happen?
If it did, I'm sure you'd find a way to rationalise it.This is over my head, I must confess. Did something happen?
If you say so. I'm just simply trying to understand the question here...If it did, I'm sure you'd find a way to rationalise it.
That’s bollocks.
He said he’d testify if subpoena’d. The Senate voted 52-48 to not have any witnesses (a first for an impeachment passed to The Senate).
That’s bollocks.
He said he’d testify if subpoena’d. The Senate voted 52-48 to not have any witnesses (a first for an impeachment passed to The Senate).
This is an unpopular take but I don’t see how you can justify a protest but not a rally. The mass protests are a green light for him to have his rallies.
The reason I say this is because I’ve just seen a CNN reporter (J.Acosta) asking the WH press sec if he’ll take responsibility if people get sick, meanwhile, his network has advocated these gatherings. Campaigning for racial justice is clearly a more worthy cause then his rallies but for a tv network to suddenly change it’s position and care about the impacts of covid-19 from mass gatherings seems remarkably disingenuous.
Don't disagree but this is more about Jr's faux outrage over an incident that happened as a direct consequence of his fathers racist rhetoric enabling all those police officers who think they can beat up or murder black people with impunity.Less about the English muffin meal and everything to do with the intolerable stresses she is feeling. No need to comment on anything else.