Why is a uefa official attending a uefa match that big an issue? And I doubt he was testing the vol au vents as I am sure robber harris, slyman stones, James fucker at al will have got there first
Sounds possible, but how about the timing? How could the decision have been known at the time?
As @projectriver said before mate, you can never be 100% sure after a legal battle or before. Think he said you could be as high as 70% before and 95% after. Maybe we’re in the 95% category after and that’s what has been stated to the players etc.Sounds possible, but how about the timing? How could the decision have been known at the time?
Can we blame Everton fans if the Town Hall is set alight in the same way LiVARpool did?Can I just remind everyone that you still have to socially distance, so next Monday when we gather outside the Town Hall to aim fireworks at it please do so in a responsible manner and keep 2 metres apart.
Potentially. The process seems to be that the panel make a decision, which can be a majority decision, then pass it to the CAS President's office for review and sign-off. I can't imagine that they'd announce a date for release of the decision until that was complete and the decision had been signed off. So that would have happened about 2 weeks ago (although we don't know if/when it was or will be communicated formally to the parties).Sounds possible, but how about the timing? How could the decision have been known at the time?
Do you mean suspended as in withdrawn but the meaning of 'the ban will be overturned' was lost in translation from English to Spanish? Seems plausible.I hope this isn't going to come back and bite me on the backside but I'm going to post it anyway.
Was just thinking about the story that the ban will be "suspended", which has been dismissed by some of us as unrealistic but might fit in with something else I heard, which I'd also dismissed. We know that the journalist who is reporting the "ban suspended" story is close to Aguero and I'd heard recently from a contact that another first team player had said that we'd won the case. I discounted that story as although it was given to me in very good faith (a) I couldn't corroborate it and (b) it was third-hand (i.e. x told y, who told z).
But what if the players have been told we've won (rather than we're confident we're going to win, which is a different thing) and in the translation from Spanish, "the ban will be overturned" became 'the ban will get suspended"? A bit like Ceferin's "concrete" case actually being "specific" case. Interesting thought.
Funny how my post attracted 12 likes. How many did your sour effort get?Yeah of course, why are you discussing things on a forum for discussion?
but genuinely though, my issue with it is someone leaping to your defense like he did, not actually arguing what the post said just that it was said. That’s not a discussion, it’s a circle-jerk.
Yeah of course, why are you discussing things on a forum for discussion?
but genuinely though, my issue with it is someone leaping to your defense like he did, not actually arguing what the post said just that it was said. That’s not a discussion, it’s a circle-jerk.
God look at all your likes!If that’s genuinely all you think PR has added to the debate, then you either:
1 - don’t understand his posts, in which case why not respond and ask him what point he’s trying to make
2 - don’t agree with his take on the situation, in which case why not offer your alternative interpretation to add the the debate, or
3 - haven’t actually read his posts on this issue - in which case your opinion on them is, frankly, worthless.
He’s always taken the time to consider and respond to people’s questions drawing on his specific experience and expertise, which many may not have direct access to in their own line of work.
This is why most value his take on the whole CAS situation, and appreciate what he’s added to the debate. Just because he doesn’t go for the easy on the ear ‘UEFA are G14 scum and will fail because they’re bastards’ angle, and provides a bit more objectivity doesn’t mean he isn’t a ‘proper’ City fan.
Sounds possible, but how about the timing? How could the decision have been known at the time?
And he attended twice. Those vol au vents must be fantastic.I think while there is an ongoing investigation into the club it would be a weird place to randomly pop up at just to watch a bit of football, especially as there were other Champions League games on that same week that he could’ve attended.
Hahaha! Oh man you’ve got me there.Funny how my post attracted 12 likes. How many did your sour effort get?
And your latin is shit!
I think your first line was the answer, it’s on twatter
Blackstone LJ : For these reasons, I would allow City's appeal.Maybe at the hearing the judges turned around and said to Uefa " and you bellends thought you would ban them based on this? you band of incompetent wankers"
If they did I am sure we would be pretty sure we had won without the verdict being released :)
Ok. Let's be mates!Hahaha! Oh man you’ve got me there.
Any idea when the club expect the decision sir
I'd be happy with that pal!Ok. Let's be mates!
I was told when I was just a little kid in the mid sixties that it was character building being a Blue, clearly shows the mentality was ingrained even then.That's what makes being a blue unique. What a strange bunch we are, coming back for more mental torture time and again.
It was also suggested on Twatter that Mansour would sell up because he would be banned as a director. By A so called journalist. Ycnmiu.Point taken. On rare occasions though, it's a source of knowledge and good information.
The prospect of stripped titles from 12 and 14 suddenly made me very nervous. Maybe someone with knowledge on here could confirm (if they haven't already) whether this is a plausible worst case prospect or otherwise?