UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
I saw that link earlier but there’s nothing on the specials on the app. Make of that what you will.

Reason to be worried? Bookies rarely wrong, they don’t like being wrong.

Reason not to be worried? It was 2 days ago.

So on balance I don’t know. But I’m confident.
It’s total and utter bollocks. Have you ever seen a bookie list a series of odds with no way to have a bet on those odds? Me neither.
 
MAN CITY CHAMPIONS LEAGUE BAN APPEAL ODDS

4/5 To be banned for one year instead of two
6/4 To be officially banned for the next two years from Champions League
7/4 Pep Guardiola to leave the club this summer
3/1 To win 19/20 Champions League
8/1 To win their appeal (and not be banned)
8/1 To lose their appeal, and Kevin de Bruyne to leave
12/1 To win the Champions League in 22/23
50/1 To win their appeal, then go on and win next year’s Champions League

*All odds correct at time of publication*


Bookies seem certain we're banned.

That was 2 days ago, I'm trying to get paddy to publish them odds on site so i can whack a wedge on.
 
Actually had to trawl quite a few posts back to see who you were talking about - I thought it was David Conn!
Apply it to any one of Conn, Syed, Reeb, Delaney, Harris and a few others and it still holds true (literally in the case of Syed, Harris, and Delaney, all of whom I have directly engaged).
 
I alluded to this yesterday, as well, but I had a “discussion” with him quite awhile ago now that spanned two days, mostly covering the underlying racism and xenophobia in his treatment of City, PSG, FFP, and his musings about the state of football in general. It also briefly touched on his favouritism for American-owned clubs (whilst ignoring the deep seeded financial and ethical issues with them), as well as his flawed understanding of financial management and analysis in general.

He conceded absolutely nothing and every response was similar to what you have described in spirit; it was very much the intellectual coward’s escape of “you don’t understand what I am saying” and “I know more than you so am always going to be right about this”.

Funny enough, shortly after I fully disclosed my credentials (as a basis for dissolving that “I know more about this” defence) he ceased responding to me.

He’s a charlatan, a malcontent, and an idiot.
Being unwilling to look at something from the other persons point oof view is the downfall of many sales situations.
Pareto rules in most areas of disagreement with a full 80 percent of areas to agree on yet his "you are with me or against me" stance means he is an evangelist not a journo.
 
The odds are meaningless, Bookies will take fuck all liability on a market like that.

Most Likely be £20 max bet
 
That was 2 days ago, I'm trying to get paddy to publish them odds on site so i can whack a wedge on.

Thought you only do matched betting ;)
I was hoping to lump on the 2 worst case scenarios as it’ll be worth losing a few hundred quid if we win, and if we lose I’ll be able to go out and get wankered and forget about it!
 
Eh... you do know he has a degree in journalism don’t you?
A journalism degree? Based on what I’m seeing, that must be the easiest degree in history...

Journalism degree final Exam paper...

Q1 (20 marks)

Name, Surname

Q2 (20 marks)

You need to write a story that will be read by fans of football clubs that play in red. You don’t actually have any knowledge to write it. Do you...

A) Make it up as long as the red teams supporters like what it’s saying.
B) As per answer A, but pretending you have sources.
C) object to the editor and refuse to write it, as you’re a professional journalist.

Q3 (20 marks...ps, no wrong answer here)

If you were stupid enough to answer C in Q2, how long do you think your career in journalism would last?

A) would be over as soon as I left the editors’ office.
B) would be over as soon as the words ‘object’ left my lips.
C) would effectively be over as soon as the thought to object entered my head.

Q4 (20 Marks)

You hear from a reliable source that Manchester City have done something praiseworthy. Do you...

A) write a piece covering the story and quoting your reliable source.
B) Assume your reliable sources emails have been hacked, and ignore it.
C) Assume your reliable source is actually a plant from Abu Dhabi, and write a 5 week expose about Abu Dhabi bribing their way to the top.

Q5 (20 Marks)

A Manchester United youth team player scores a goal. Do you...

A) - do nothing until they’ve proven worthy of special praise for an extended period of good games.
B) - Write with effusive praise about the United academy and suggest this might be another excellent product from the production line
C) - Sanction a 5 episode documentary on the greatest wonder-kid of all time, who plays for the worlds greatest club, and spend at least 30 minutes showing every camera angle in slow motion of their goal.
 
Thought you only do matched betting ;)
I was hoping to lump on the 2 worst case scenarios as it’ll be worth losing a few hundred quid if we win, and if we lose I’ll be able to go out and get wankered and forget about it!

10 years ago my mate posted about us signing David Silva used my credit card at the time on skybet took a few hundred off them haha.

8/1 is good value with sources.
 
I alluded to this yesterday, as well, but I had a “discussion” with him quite awhile ago now that spanned two days, mostly covering the underlying racism and xenophobia in his treatment of City, PSG, FFP, and his musings about the state of football in general. It also briefly touched on his favouritism for American-owned clubs (whilst ignoring the deep seeded financial and ethical issues with them), as well as his flawed understanding of financial management and analysis in general.

He conceded absolutely nothing and every response was similar to what you have described in spirit; it was very much the intellectual coward’s escape of “you don’t understand what I am saying” and “I know more than you so am always going to be right about this”.

Funny enough, shortly after I fully disclosed my credentials (as a basis for dissolving that “I know more about this” defence) he ceased responding to me.

He’s a charlatan, a malcontent, and an idiot.
And a cunnt
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top