Agree with the new investment from the Yank group, Sane sale and general revenue will mean funds are there. It’s exciting to see players who were mooted at £90-100 mill being reduced to £60-70 mill. But let’s see how de Laurentis behaves this time.We are in a better position than a 99% of clubs and it's now very much a buyers market.
This is interesting as well
Cash is king, and Napoli and de Laurentis are skint, payback time for JorghinioAgree with the new investment from the Yank group, Sane sale and general revenue will mean funds are there. It’s exciting to see players who were mooted at £90-100 mill being reduced to £60-70 mill. But let’s see how de Laurentis behaves this time.
There's good reason I think to believe the result is embargoed.
I know mate, sorryI mean I won't sleep well, one of the biggest decisions for years this for City.
Also pretty sure that even in the UK the emails would fail the prejudicial impact v probative effect test under common law.The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine doesn’t apply in English criminal law in any event; unless you count section 78 of PACE.
That highlights how much of an agenda UEFA have got against us.
I hope so. If we know then I am 95% sure we have won, as no way would Ferran and Txikki not have told Pep, in confidence, and no way would Pep have then kept mentioning it in such a positive manner. If we don’t know then I am more like 80:20Not a chance, both parties know and I believe have for some time, probably when UEFA and City agreed to delay the answer from the 10th until 13th July.
That highlights how much of an agenda UEFA have got against us.
I love being a City fan. You become an expert on law, accounting & finance, geo-politics, PR & media, cyber security and loads of other stuff.The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine doesn’t apply in English criminal law in any event; unless you count section 78 of PACE.
Just read this on ragcafe.
It's difficult for an organisation with limited financial power and a primary interest in the good of football to go up against an organisation with unlimited financial power and a primary self interest in themselves.
HAHAHAHA. " Primary interest in good of football".
Phil is Spanish for Bertie.
Gibraltar is Spanish for Stockport.
Don't forget we scored 5 against the Dippers only for VAR to disallow it for Foden's innocuous handball.
I’m sure you’re right.It’s an American Criminal Law principle. I am Qualified in UK and US. The legal principles of Switzerland however would have applied and it is highly unlikely that fruit of the poisonous tree would apply in an Arbitration in any jurisdiction.
Should we win tomorrow. How much money do we have to spend on transfers in the window? I’m sure no one will know down to the last pound, but a win tomorrow would mean spend big? And loss would mean a one in one out type of scenario?
I’d love us to break the transfer spend in an off season should we win. Just to really rub everyone’s noses in it. Not that we need that type of investment just to see what Delaney etc write afterwards would just be majestic.
That highlights how much of an agenda UEFA have got against us.
You’ve obviously never made a section 78 application in front of a circuit judge!Also pretty sure that even in the UK the emails would fail the prejudicial impact v probative effect test under common law.
And pissing in sinks.I love being a City fan. You become an expert on law, accounting & finance, geo-politics, PR & media, cyber security and loads of other stuff.
I know, I just wanted someone else to write it so that I could read it, thanks