Eccles Blue
Well-Known Member
I would have accepted lads because in Ireland that’s a sort of collective term for both genders! ;-)
Don’t EVER try and change the words to that song!I've never felt more like singing the blues
CITY win..Uefa lose..oh CITY you got me singing the blues
Dan Roan wasn't fair at all. He finished his report by making out that City weren't completely exonerated. We were absolutely exonerated - the fine was because we refused to cooperate with a panel we didn't trust.Think someone has had a word with Dan Roan this BBC report he is doing on 6pm news is almost fair!!!
It was me yes....not Ena
Thanks for all the nice comments. Well aware BBC generally ask me to tick a diversity box but I like to think I give as good as I get!
Thanks, I knew he was once our announcer, and a rag, I have always thought they were one and the same.No. Their announcer is Alan Keegan since 2000. Before that he was our announcer!!! But he was a rag even then.
It just gives us a second verse :)Don’t EVER try and change the words to that song!
Hahahaha
love this club so much!
Seriously, chaps. Do not read the Daily Mail. It is completely bereft of morals & original thought.I have just got around to reading what this creep has written: City have been found not in breach of regulations because they refused to cooperate with the investigation so nobody could get to the bottom of what was going on?? THIS is published in a national newspaper? I think City fans need to take stock of just how deep and violent a hatred of our club has to be prevalent, when a reporter in a leading newspaper is confident enough to come out with not just a slur against our club but a dismissal of CAS and get it headlined. Utterly appalling.
Fair enough.It just gives us a second verse :)
Today seems to be “confirmation of things we already knew to be true” day. ;-)I would have accepted lads
Thanks, I knew he was once our announcer, and a rag, I have always thought they were one and the same.
I expect the evidence for those elements that were not time barred was exactly the same as for those that were. The haters relying on the 'technicality' seem to have missed this or ignored it. If the full argument shows this equality of evidence, where do the haters go next? They will just look so stupid.When the full ruling is published I expect one of the first steps was to remove those elements that were time barred, as there was no need to litigate them (a waste of time). Then City will have litigated those that were not time barred and proven their innocence, or where they didn't, UEFA couldn't prove City's guilt.
We should look at legal action against Dan Roan - 6 o'clock news - still trying to make out in that clever journalistic way of twisting things, that we're guilty even though the headline is exonerated/innocent.
Don’t tell @M18CTIDI really like Simon Davies.