Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What you will now get is what we saw with the media post CAS.

"Yeah they will say that wont they.....we know they are guilty"
You’re really comparing it to CAS.

Quote from CAS finding:
“MANCHESTER CITY FC DID NOT DISGUISE EQUITY FUNDING AS SPONSORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS”

Quote from Russia investigation:
“British government and British intelligence failed to prepare or conduct any proper assessment of Kremlin attempts to interfere with the 2016 Brexit Referendum”
and in a comment comparing it to the US investigation of their 2016 election
“Had the relevant parts of the Intelligence Community conducted a similar threat assessment prior to the referendum, it is inconceivable that they would not have reached the same conclusion as to Russian intent, which might then have led them to take action to protect the process,”

So exactly the same as the CAS outcome. Nothing to see here.
 
It's a fucking good job non of these remainers don't work for CAS, City would
be out of business by now.
Evidence? ''Well, there isn't any at all, none, nada, zilch, but the cunts must be guilty.
 
You’re really comparing it to CAS.

Quote from CAS finding:
“MANCHESTER CITY FC DID NOT DISGUISE EQUITY FUNDING AS SPONSORSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS”

Quote from Russia investigation:
“British government and British intelligence failed to prepare or conduct any proper assessment of Kremlin attempts to interfere with the 2016 Brexit Referendum”
and in a comment comparing it to the US investigation of their 2016 election
“Had the relevant parts of the Intelligence Community conducted a similar threat assessment prior to the referendum, it is inconceivable that they would not have reached the same conclusion as to Russian intent, which might then have led them to take action to protect the process,”

So exactly the same as the CAS outcome. Nothing to see here.

Spot on.

Nothing to see.
 
It's a fucking good job non of these remainers don't work for CAS, City would
be out of business by now.
Evidence? ''Well, there isn't any at all, none, nada, zilch, but the cunts must be guilty.
It's difficult to see evidence if you deliberately don't look.

Doesn't it bother you that our government and security services have been totally negligent? Of course not, you don't care if the Russians interfered and you're happy not to find out if it helped the outcome you wanted. The ends justify the means eh?
 
Lemme just recap the past few days as it appears a lot has progressed:

Parliament has voted that the Government has authority of future trade deals.
Russia was not involved in the Brexit Referendum to the extent that was claimed to affect or influence the result.
UK is in talks with EFTA members Norway, Liectenstein and Switzerland about a trade deal.


Is that about where we are? And i'm guessing the usual suspects are finding imaginary faults with these developments and/or denigrating them?
 
Lemme just recap the past few days as it appears a lot has progressed:

Parliament has voted that the Government has authority of future trade deals.
Russia was not involved in the Brexit Referendum to the extent that was claimed to affect or influence the result.
UK is in talks with EFTA members Norway, Liectenstein and Switzerland about a trade deal.


Is that about where we are? And i'm guessing the usual suspects are finding imaginary faults with these developments and/or denigrating them?
No you're wrong about the second point.
No-one knows the extent of Russian involvement in the Brexit referendum because it wasn't investigated.
 
It's difficult to see evidence if you deliberately don't look.

Doesn't it bother you that our government and security services have been totally negligent? Of course not, you don't care if the Russians interfered and you're happy not to find out if it helped the outcome you wanted. The ends justify the means eh?
It must be difficult for you to discover that the evidence you and others
had been convinced was going to be revealed isn't there.
 
No you're wrong about the second point.
No-one knows the extent of Russian involvement in the Brexit referendum because it wasn't investigated.
Then where is it? If it's so obvious people would have found it by now, especially hackers.
 
It must be difficult for you to discover that the evidence you and others
had been convinced was going to be revealed isn't there.
A perfect adage here would be "i'll believe it when I see it".
If the information is readily available and accessible, being investigated or no, someone would have released it by now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top