Facts or your own personal truths?
How could it? Unless you expect the committee to do the police work personally.
required character? By whose definition? Yours?
These generalised and pompous statements do you absolutely no favours and even alienate those that are relatively friendly towards you.
Why have the allegations not been properly investigated? The report covers more than adequately the reasons they should be.
Why was the report held back for 9 months? Why did the PM lie constantly about it?
Try answering those questions. Sorry if even the fact that I ask them labels me as having deficient character. If you can't or won't answer them perhaps you should reflect in the mirror yourself.
If you had been on the Leave side of the argument for the last 4 years you would have a far better understanding of what it is to be the target of pompous/snide/insulting posts.
You have - I humbly suggest - a repeated blind spot on this thread.....
You jump in and get involved in points that are aimed elsewhere - and you are wholly inconsistent in what you react to or pull up - this habit does you no favours
It renders all the good stuff you post far less relevant and impactful
My position has been simple and clear - so please answer these questions - without more whataboutery and distraction - simple yes or no please......
Did
@Ifwecouldjust....... post:
Still beats me how people can support Brexit whilst the Government are sitting on a report (despite a petition demanding it be released) which allegedly confirms Russian interference in the referendum (If it didn't it would've been released by now)..... the similarities to the support of Trump are mind blowing.
Surely the Government should be forced to release it / make the results public (no redactions) .... discuss it in parliament and then a decision should be made.
??
2/ Does the report reflect evidence that would support the level of certainty expressed by him in that post??
If the answers are anything other than respectively Yes and No - then I will leave you to it.
If they are Yes and No then you are confirming the thrust of what I have been saying on this subject today.
@Ifwecouldjust....... is running and hiding - and not finding the 'character' to just admit the obvious truth.
My comments have largely been about this simple fact..... and it is a simple fact and no prevarication and whataboutery can distract from that...
Remainers - including
@Ifwecouldjust....... have been saying for a long time that the report would demonstrate that there was interference
The report does not
They were wrong
Yes, there are other questions that the report raises - but these are facts - and it would be a pleasant change to see people just accept that they were wrong with earlier comments before pompously ploughing on with fresh inaccuracies
You have an obsession of getting in the way and taking on the case for others - as I say it does you no favours
I will happily answer the separate, but related, questions that you posed when I see an answer to mine - and I see
@Ifwecouldjust....... and others admit that they were wrong - afterall I have been making points mainly different to the ones you are making and I made my first before the whataboutery and distraction