Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
We're talking about the claims that were being made at the time surrounding the accusation of Russian involvement and said chickens coming home to roost.

You may not remember the discussions and claims that were made at the time by users on here which the report has not concluded in their favour, maybe that's the issue.
Well, stop talking about what was said, and talk about what is in the report, why it wasn't published, and why Johnson lied about it. Forget whether there was any influence on Brexit - you're right, it wouldn't be enough to swing the vote (there were darker and overt forces at work there) - but start asking why the government "did not want to know".
 
And this is why no-one debates you with you. :) It's called a spelling mistake/typing error. It happens.

What was it you said in the past, you know before you deleted it? People making, what was it, "prodigious comments"? I forget now.
I’m disappointed it wasn’t deliberate.
So was it spurious or scurrilous?
 
I’ve got no issue with the referendum and never have done. I’m not really sure what point you’re trying to argue though, is it that Russian interference in our domestic politics doesn’t matter if it wasn’t deemed as pivotal? Or that Russian interference around the brexit referendum didn’t happen or wasn’t swayed one way or the other?
It's Brexit mate. If it's Brexit, covert foreign interference doesn't matter, nor does welcoming Trump's lies about first in the queue, nor does any of the lying about deals (before or since June 2016), nor does the government forecast about the damage of No Deal (or even a deal), nor does the reality of more custom costs than anything we'll save in contributions, nor does having to pay more for European trips (and not taking your French-speaking dogs to your gite), nor does the threat to food standards, nor does not being able to work in the EU for more than 90 days without a visa, nor does having no-one to serve you coffee in Pret (or your gran her meals in the care home), nor does having to pay to replicate licences for airlines, aircraft, medicines, satellites, etc etc

Whatever crap Brexit brings, including Russian Mafiosi (whatever that is in Russian), it's fine.
 
On false comparables or a disingenuous interpretation of the report going the other way too, not on the underlying point.

I like how you pretend to have no skin in this game.

One or two others who post on here claim the same yet only ever seek to pick holes in one side of the argument.

Not an issue of course but its best to be open imo.
 
I like how you pretend to have no skin in this game.

One or two others who post on here claim the same yet only ever seek to pick holes in one side of the argument.

Not an issue of course but its best to be open imo.

Ive got skin on the game on this government, not on brexit. The only skin I’ve got on that is being utterly depressed we’re still having to talk about it.
 
Its a shame you have to come on and clean their potty mouthed rants up jim.
Hey ho. They should know better, but c'est la vie, as Mendy might say. A few on here seem to think that off topic is an "anything goes" zone. Not so. Check out the forum rules.


"Don't abuse or personally insult other members. Treat fellow users with respect."

Also....

"Racist/xenophobic/homophobic/misogynistic or any bigoted comments will not be tolerated, nor will extreme political views."

It's not that much to ask, is it?
 
This is the brexit thread.

And people are still using it to make disingenuous (or simply wrong) points about wider issues. Like i said earlier, people are still viewing everything still just within this prism and allowing it to influence more than it should.
 
Ive got skin on the game on this government, not on brexit. The only skin I’ve got on that is being utterly depressed we’re still having to talk about it.
You and a lot of people. Especially when any "bash the Government" debate is linked to brexit every single time, purely because the Conservatives have been the Government presiding over our withdrawal.

If relevant debates could be kept to the relevant topics, debates wouldn't descend in the way that they do. It would also help not to have people assume that supporting brexit means being supportive of the Conservative Government, either, considering how they're a pariah on here.
 
Hey ho. They should know better, but c'est la vie, as Mendy might say. A few on here seem to think that off topic is an "anything goes" zone. Not so. Check out the forum rules.


"Don't abuse or personally insult other members. Treat fellow users with respect."

Also....

"Racist/xenophobic/homophobic/misogynistic or any bigoted comments will not be tolerated, nor will extreme political views."

It's not that much to ask, is it?

Irish jokes?
 
In your opinion ;-)
Exam questions for those that seek to deflect from the report:

Why have the allegations not been properly investigated? The report covers more than adequately the reasons they should be.
Why was the report held back for 9 months? Why did the PM lie constantly about it?

Why not have a bash?
Ok. I'm not really that well versed in the methods of int collation, planning and direction of our int services or the way that analysis reports are fed from agencies up through the JIC/OCS Perm Secs Committee and cabinet up to the PM/Cabinet and Security Commission. However, my best guess is that although the threat assessment from Russia is entirely credible there may simply have been more pressing issues and 'bigger fish to fry'. I'd imagine Putin has enjoyed being left alone while we were concerned with the ME, home grown terror and the threat posed by China. If you actually get hold of the report and read it, you might notice large amounts of redacted material, and the reason for the delay may be within that, although there have been claims that there have been no further redaction since the initial limited release. All a guess on my part, but hope that will in some way count as having a 'bash'.
 
Hey ho. They should know better, but c'est la vie, as Mendy might say. A few on here seem to think that off topic is an "anything goes" zone. Not so. Check out the forum rules.


"Don't abuse or personally insult other members. Treat fellow users with respect."

Also....

"Racist/xenophobic/homophobic/misogynistic or any bigoted comments will not be tolerated, nor will extreme political views."

It's not that much to ask, is it?

The WhatsApp group are really that sad mate, unfortunately.
 
And people are still using it to make disingenuous (or simply wrong) points about wider issues. Like i said earlier, people are still viewing everything still just within this prism and allowing it to influence more than it should.

I can only speak for myself here but I've asked for concrete evidence of interference that led to voter fraud and have said in that instance i would want brexit put on hold immediately and a new vote called. I have also said that interference is interference and its no good moaning about just Russia when every country in the world had an opinion on brexit when asked and certain leaders of certain countries were actively asked to get involved and ask the British public to vote to remain.

That apparently isn't an issue though and its at that point i just switch off as its clear, the argument and faux outrage is disingenuous and it's just sour grapes yet again.

get rid of all influence and ban all political social media campaigning for me tomorrow, no issue at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top