CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

Oh by the way,

the entire media will focus on the "not complying" thing
They will completely ignore the fact we KNEW they would leak everything, every last word, and that we didn't trust them (for good reason, proved time and time again) and just hammer us for that.

This ride isn't ending soon
 
Lets not expect anything other than a re hash of those mail headlines. I can see the sky expert on this spouting the same old story that uefa presented a poor case and therefore we got off. They wont go into the actual facts, they will just add another spin to the 'city have got off with it' story.
We all knew the media would spin it regardless all I can say is thank feck we were innocent...….can you imagine the shit if we wernt ?
 
There was a short note on SSN about 30 minutes ago, with a comment that more details to follow after 6 pm.
I think it's fair to give them an hour or so to get their wording in order.
‘City dodged a ban by obstructing investigation’ just wait and see
 
Given that they have cobbled together two separate emails, could this been seen as fraud?

If that's the form they were provided by the hacker, then no.
UEFA would have had to combine them themselves to be in trouble over it. As it was they just got essentially a forged document.
 
looks to me that the prosecution of city was based on doctored emails. We could have saved 10M just showing them the originals however, as we did during the trial.
 
Here you go BB.....

laptop-wank.gif



Enjoy!
The fact that you had that on hand(arf arf) is a little disconcerting?
 
If that's the form they were provided by the hacker, then no.
UEFA would have had to combine them themselves to be in trouble over it. As it was they just got essentially a forged document.

The hacker just dumped the files, he didn't comb through all 17 million of them or whatever. That was der Spiegel.

Also relevant, they published an email from 2010, before FFP but redacted the date. That seems actionable.
 
looks to me that the prosecution of city was based on doctored emails. We could have saved 10M just showing them the originals however, as we did during the trial.

Why would you show UEFA anything ? UEFA had already leaked City were getting a two ban before the case started !
 
So,getting pep,centurians,everything domestically ,our enemies panicked and insisted UEFA act,they cobble together something a kid could drive a train through,gave us two year ban based on nothing,presumably hoping we would end up with one year,tried to get us to take a deal,the nasty nine write their pathetic letter,pigmol got the rags into position to take our spot and ensured the dippers got over the line

I am flabbergasted that they took that road on no evidence,the have been embarrassed beyond repair ,be interesting to see whose heads get rolled

There is no corruption in football though
 
Seeing as City are completely innocent and the evidence against us was stolen and doctored why havent costs been awarded us. City are innocent UEFA should be paying our defence fees.

Because we didn't supply the evidence during the investigation, thus hindering the investigation to come to the correct decision and to not pursue Manchester City.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top