CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

The sad thing in all of this is that it shows without doubt the level of corruption that runs throughout football.

Both FIFA & UEFA are rotten to the core

We will never see another " Nottingham Forest "ever again as it will simply not be allowed to happen.
 
I wish the club would take the kid gloves off. Do they not understand how pissed off us fans are over their inaction and the constant spew of lies shouted by the media who do it as they know we are a soft touch.

1) All directors an employees bar the match day squad and coaching staff/manager should not be welcome at our games against any of the teams who ganged up on us. No Hospitality, nothing. Ban them all from attending
2) Mail needs to be banned also

Don't you actually think the top brass at City are more pissed off than you or any supporter. They have actually had to deal with all this shit.
 
That looks like it was on the question of whether the Etihad sponsorship was fair value and a related party or not that one of the panel dissented
I just don't understand how you can even word a rule about related parties. How many clubs in Europe are owned or part-owned by their sponsors? Most of the German league for starters. I mean how could Red Bull Leipzig seriously claim that their sponsor isn't a related party?
 
Can someone post the gif of the guy with the tissues / cream ? opening up his laptop.
Here you go BB.....

laptop-wank.gif



Enjoy!
 
Or on the BBC website
You'd hope (possibly incorrectly) that they're a bit more careful than the clickbait journalists that are currently writing about it. Perhaps even going so far as to actually read it before writing their stories.
 
Because one was a UEFA chosen one,we had our choice then there was a totally independent one
These are reputable legal experts. I wouldn't expect them to vote in line with their 'sponsor', otherwise it defeats the purpose of letting each party choose a panelist. If they always vote for the side that elected them, CAS would stop this by choosing all members of the panel.

I don't agree with that as an explanation. It suggests the evidence was not quite so compelling in respect that part of the decision.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top