CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

I replied by stating that we are delighted the emails were permitted as evidence because we could then prove that UEFAS copies were butchered and mangled to make us look guilty when in fact they’d prove we did nothing untoward



I think he's reading the doctored CAS report
 
Nuke the fucking whole town if Burnley. I’ve got a spare hundred quid to pay for the damage

I think more fitting would be a nuke enabled drone towing a " Burnley just doesn't matter" banner.......then when over the cess pit cut the engines like a doodlebug....BOOM !
 
I know my eyesight is failing but I am sure I read somewhere in the verdict that CAS mentions the fact that one of emails used as evidence was actually two emails doctored and made to look as one. Nick Harris suggests that isn’t the case and all emails were authentic. Am I going mad or is he, as I presume, being economical with the truth?
 
It also goes in to great detail how Sheikh Mansour has held no position that gives him authority to direct Etihad regarding it’s commercial interests.
 
I replied by stating that we are delighted the emails were permitted as evidence because we could then prove that UEFAS copies were butchered and mangled to make us look guilty when in fact they’d prove we did nothing untoward


Expect to be blocked anytime soon, the truth gets in the way of his agenda
 
I know my eyesight is failing but I am sure I read somewhere in the verdict that CAS mentions the fact that one of emails used as evidence was actually two emails doctored and made to look as one. Nick Harris suggests that isn’t the case and all emails were authentic. Am I going mad or is he, as I presume, being economical with the truth?

Just tell him to read the 93 pages it in there.
 
I know my eyesight is failing but I am sure I read somewhere in the verdict that CAS mentions the fact that one of emails used as evidence was actually two emails doctored and made to look as one. Nick Harris suggests that isn’t the case and all emails were authentic. Am I going mad or is he, as I presume, being economical with the truth?
Harris is wrong
 
I know my eyesight is failing but I am sure I read somewhere in the verdict that CAS mentions the fact that one of emails used as evidence was actually two emails doctored and made to look as one. Nick Harris suggests that isn’t the case and all emails were authentic. Am I going mad or is he, as I presume, being economical with the truth?
He doesn’t care about the truth.
 
Of the usual suspects who Ogdens mentions to provide “impartial” comment Marcotti is strangely quiet, Normally likes to get a sly dig in
 
Just read the BBC report on its site, are we sure we were exonerated? What a fucking hatchet job, reads like we are guilty and seems heavily favourable to uefa. Why don't they actually ask why these charges were brought and who was behind it? Fucking shithouses
 
Well I've just read it from cover to cover and UEFA's case was just fucking bollox.
City are just guilty of failing to comply with a kangeroo court. I'm actually staggered that CAS allowed them to get away with it.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top