CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

I replied by stating that we are delighted the emails were permitted as evidence because we could then prove that UEFAS copies were butchered and mangled to make us look guilty when in fact they’d prove we did nothing untoward



I think he's reading the doctored CAS report
 
I know my eyesight is failing but I am sure I read somewhere in the verdict that CAS mentions the fact that one of emails used as evidence was actually two emails doctored and made to look as one. Nick Harris suggests that isn’t the case and all emails were authentic. Am I going mad or is he, as I presume, being economical with the truth?
 
It also goes in to great detail how Sheikh Mansour has held no position that gives him authority to direct Etihad regarding it’s commercial interests.
 
I replied by stating that we are delighted the emails were permitted as evidence because we could then prove that UEFAS copies were butchered and mangled to make us look guilty when in fact they’d prove we did nothing untoward


Expect to be blocked anytime soon, the truth gets in the way of his agenda
 
I know my eyesight is failing but I am sure I read somewhere in the verdict that CAS mentions the fact that one of emails used as evidence was actually two emails doctored and made to look as one. Nick Harris suggests that isn’t the case and all emails were authentic. Am I going mad or is he, as I presume, being economical with the truth?

Just tell him to read the 93 pages it in there.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.