Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
All our lawyers were members of The Barm Association.So you're saying we had 9 lawyers there trying to push the idea that it was a barm, when we all knew it was a muffin all along
All our lawyers were members of The Barm Association.So you're saying we had 9 lawyers there trying to push the idea that it was a barm, when we all knew it was a muffin all along
All our lawyers were members of The Barm Association.
The Liverpool defender handled it after taking out Sterling too - so a pen on two counts.
The game should have ended 2-2 (if pen converted), yet we lost 3-0.
Bent officials.
The game should have ended 3-0 to us because the Dippers should have been disqualified and banned for another half decade for the coach attack.
Exactly... and we should have been going in at h/t in the 2nd leg 2-0 up (4-2) with 2 away goals.
Was just going to post exactly what @levets posted that disallowed goal on the stroke of HT at home was the killer, had that have correctly stood I've no doubt we'd have qualified.
Interesting conclusions about UEFA competition, the way they share the prize money and the consequences in shaping a non "fair" and non "competitive" environment.
Nah Hoeness or anyone with anyone with political sway with the Bavarian Rags is a ****.Having read what he said in German (I can't play the original interview video) I suspect the UK press are spinning it as critical of CAS, especially those outlets saying things like "Former Bayern Munich president Uli Hoeness has criticized the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) for overturning Manchester City's two-year Champions League ban."
He hasn't criticised CAS. it's criticism of UEFA for acting against us with "no substantive evidence". My translation: "If the CAS judges thought UEFA had acted badly there's no surprise at the outcome."
"Obviously UEFA's reasoning was just weak."
I can't see a basis in the original for "we must do with Manchester City" except for the possibility of meeting them in the semi-final.
Don't blame Hoeness. It's our press again.
The offside one was dubious and the double penalty was fucking criminal.None of the three liverpool goals were contentious. City had a goal disallowed for a very dubious offside, but the linesman gave that.
What were his actual stitch ups.
Castles really is a fraud. He lambasts City for buying eight defenders worth an average of 45m Euros each since the takeover which makes a total of 360m Euros in 12 years (a very modest outlay). In the same period United have bought 15 defenders for a total outlay of 450m Euros I have heard of lies and damn statistics but surely this is the definition of fake news. None of his content stands up to any scrutiny. During this period United bought gems like Bailly, Lindelof, Rojo, Blind, and Harry Maguire was a snip at 86m Euros.The state of fucking Castles - again.
Duncan Castles
@DuncanCastles
·
7 Aug
Wolves reach settlement agreement with UEFA for breaking Financial Fair Play regulations. Conditional financial punishment of €0.2m is one fiftieth of the sum levied upon Manchester City by CAS for the Abu Dhabi-owned club’s latest contravention of FFP.
No need for the usual suspects to apply, I'm sure they've already passed this with flying colours.
Takes pay as Moaniho's promoter so it's no suprise. He's a ****.Castles really is a fraud. He lambasts City for buying eight defenders worth an average of 45m Euros each since the takeover which makes a total of 360m Euros in 12 years (a very modest outlay). In the same period United have bought 15 defenders for a total outlay of 450m Euros I have heard of lies and damn statistics but surely this is the definition of fake news. None of his content stands up to any scrutiny. During this period United bought gems like Bailly, Lindelof, Rojo, Blind, and Harry Maguire was a snip at 86m Euros.
The offside one was dubious and the double penalty was fucking criminal.
Agreed. I think referees in the CL are generally much better than the clowns we suffer from in the PL. There are exceptions of course. VAR is usually used better in the CL with referees checking the monitor (though the Juve match the other night did turn into a farce)I am no apologist for shit refereeing.
Even the most diligent of referees cannot give very close offsides, hence my point about the three liverpool goals.
The disallowed "goal" in the second leg, was more contentious, I spotted it live, but I do not think it was that easy, VAR, would have altered it.
My point was that the refereeing in the two ties against Madrid, hardly showed signs of a conspiracy.
The other point I made is that i would prefer some of these CL referees to Mr Moss, Mr Oliver, and the majority of other premier league gets,
Whether we will get a fair trial by referees in the ko matches , won't hold my breath.
A documentary about Muddy Waters that kept mentioning Sheikh Mansour.I put Aljezeera news on this morning to get a different view on the news, there was a documentary on about Muddy Waters that look into dodgy share dealings, i don't understand any of this kind of stuff but Shiekh Mansour kept getting a mention and also showed him talking at a conference, does anybody Prestwich Blue ect no anything about it?
Never felt more like singin’ the blues?I put Aljezeera news on this morning to get a different view on the news, there was a documentary on about Muddy Waters that look into dodgy share dealings, i don't understand any of this kind of stuff but Shiekh Mansour kept getting a mention and also showed him talking at a conference, does anybody Prestwich Blue ect no anything about it?