ManCitizens.
Well-Known Member
You’re wrong pal, do you mean fat granny shagger?You’re right, he is Granny Shagger
You’re wrong pal, do you mean fat granny shagger?You’re right, he is Granny Shagger
All right, I just figured it’d be easier to refer to as its his brand. Thx.
In all reality, it is. It's just three letters and avoids anyone mistaking him for the proper Ronaldo.
But the problem is that the whole acronym thing is an American trend (KB24, CP3, TB12 etc) and is often done for branding reasons. The majority of the most vocal posters on this forum are older English/ British types who aren't particularly fond of Americanism and commercialism. Not to mention, most of the time it is a bit silly and unnecessary; KB24 is more of a pain in the arse than saying/ writing Kobe and isn't used much anymore and both Chris Paul and Tom Brady have two one syllable names and aren't likely to be confused with anyone else.
Personally, I don't say CR7 because I think of it as a brand/ logo rather than the player. Plus I'm an awkward bastard and don't like him.
You can call him Ronaldo, just not like a teeney bopper.That’s not at all what I’m saying. The difference in quality when it comes to Aké vs. Stones & Otamendi, is for me at least, pretty easy to see. And yes, even before he kicked a ball for us. And yes again, C. Ronaldo is his prime is obviously a better footballer than Mahrez, regardless of what team they’re representing it’s not that hard to establish by just looking at the way they play.
OK so I can never again mention CR7 or Cristiano Ronaldo on here, because he played for United? Is it OK for me to mention Messi?
Do you guys have a list of players representing other teams that we’re not allowed to mention in this forum? It would be a good thing to have as I don’t want to step on anyones toes or break any rules.
I dunno why you’re so rattled but it’s quite obvious he was pulling you up for calling Ronaldo CR7 like a fan girl. Would you call Rooney Wazza?
Edit: Just seen the two posts above so ignore
You can call him Ronaldo, just not like a teeney bopper.
Personally, I don't say CR7 because I think of it as a brand/
What's to do with you lot this morning.
Stop going on about shit
True but losing inside or just outside the box is a defensive mistake just like Mendy being robbed of the ball against Wolves for their second goal, to me that was a fucking howler.Losing possession is not a defensive mistake in my opinion. Two I can remember without trying to find the post were Walker against Mane and Otamendi failing to close down a shot at Wolves. Ederson's goalkeeping mistakes at Trafford too.
Please can l call him 'Ronnie' as its a nice name and he is a nice modest bloke.;)Agreed. It also makes a person sound like a car to me (but then, that's logical, because it's part of the marketing strategy).
On that subject, saw an absolutely pristine TR4 parked in the street the other day. I stopped to admire it discreetly, because I dreamt for a while of owning one of those.
It has nothing to do with their ability to defend and everything to do with their ability to play football, again it's only my opinion so open to interpretation. I wouldn't criticise Aguero for a defensive mistake if he lost possession and the opposition broke away and scored for example, as that's what he's asked to do. Same with Otamendi and Zinchenko in those situations, they're asked to play, even when the situation possibly warrants them to kick it 80 yards into row z. We take risks in possession, I don't see those as defensive mistakes but each to their own.True but losing inside or just outside the box is a defensive mistake just like Mendy being robbed of the ball against Wolves for their second goal, to me that was a fucking howler.
True but losing inside or just outside the box is a defensive mistake just like Mendy being robbed of the ball against Wolves for their second goal, to me that was a fucking howler.
It has nothing to do with their ability to defend and everything to do with their ability to play football, again it's only my opinion so open to interpretation. I wouldn't criticise Aguero for a defensive mistake if he lost possession and the opposition broke away and scored for example, as that's what he's asked to do. Same with Otamendi and Zinchenko in those situations, they're asked to play, even when the situation possibly warrants them to kick it 80 yards into row z. We take risks in possession, I don't see those as defensive mistakes but each to their own.
I understand your position, I really do because as Pep calls it our defensive "stability" comes from retaining possession. In the traditional sense however, I don't think anyone would agree that losing possession is a defensive mistake. It's a bit ambiguous because our style is so different to most other teams, we play in areas most teams are scared of playing in and as a result we occasionally gift a goal to the opposition. Acceptable risks because they create so much at the other end when we get it right, which is most of the time.They become defensive mistakes, because we are poor at basic coalface defending imo & we are slow at covering apart from a couple of players.
If our basic premise is that press, win the ball, then we mostly keep the ball & stop counter attacks when we lose it, but we can't actually stop the counter attacks, then losing the ball becomes a defensive mistake, whether we like it ir not.