I've dedicated countless hours on podcasts to this very principle. City are at their most vulnerable when they have anaemic possession without threatening the opposition, because inevitably when their chance comes, they bury it either because one of our defenders makes a glaring error, or because collectively the backline shits itself. Either way, that lack of confidence starts with the attackers not taking chances as crazy as that sounds.
Also the oppositions confidence in counter attacks comes from us not threatening them when we attack. If you're Leicester, after the goal you watch us keep the ball with no real purpose for fifteen minutes and you realise "okay we're still in this game, they're just playing keep ball without laying a glove on us".
if that is the case then that goes back to the players we have in those positions and the way they are managed.
The good keeper for example especially in a side with 79 per cent possession and a fair chunk of that in the opposition half is usually called on a a couple of times to earn his corn and the same applies to the how you defend.
The fact that most of our numbers are forward means that defenders don't have as much time in games doing what they would have to do more often if possession was reversed but it doesn't excuse glaring mistakes and poor coverage and organisation when we don't have the ball.
if we cannot keep leads be they 1-0 or better then we have no hope of winning the title because opposition teams and more of them than in the past 10 years are more comfortable at getting men behind the ball.
Its pretty easy to defend when our build up play is slow and lacking passes that open up space and movement.