You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Erling Haaland
- Thread starter JOGAMIGMOG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
And again.
Doesn't he have a release clause with Dortmund, or am I misremembering that?
Would be crazy of us not to sign him next year.
60m release clause plus 40m to few other people
Bargain.60m release clause plus 40m to few other people
Bargain.
Might be wrong there think when everyone gets there cut it could be pushing 120m
Semper aggressus
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Sep 2019
- Messages
- 8,050
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Might be wrong there think when everyone gets there cut it could be pushing 120m
Still a bargain.
Especially as we'll need a Kun replacement next season.
Still a bargain.
Especially as we'll need a Kun replacement next season.
Yeah for his age it’s fair fee.
Still a bargain.
Especially as we'll need a Kun replacement next season.
when you think Kane would cost £150 million or we were willing to pay 80 for martinez from inter . £120 million for him and his agent is a bargain . 40 goals a season easy
Holcombe bloo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 1,670
11 fukcing corners. Countless crosses. Haaland would score for fun at city Debate over. Sign him. Pay the gobby greasy itai his cut.
Thaksins Love Child
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 4,633
Just fucking pay it
Sir Joe Aguero
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 3,439
Fuck this 'holistic' shit and just buy him next year, agents fee or no agents fee. He's a City fan and one of the few readily available strikers who would consistently get 30 goals a season. Fits the Prem perfectly. Instead I bet we piss 50mil each on a few strikers with 8 goals but can make short passes.
Just fucking pay it
Get rid of his agent then yes.
Holcombe bloo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 1,670
Not going to happen unfortunatel. Yayas agent was as bad or worse. Yaya was worth it. So is HaalandGet rid of his agent then yes.
Raiola is worse. He would move him on in a couple of seasons time and we would be back to square one.Not going to happen unfortunatel. Yayas agent was as bad or worse. Yaya was worth it. So is Haaland
Semper aggressus
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Sep 2019
- Messages
- 8,050
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Raiola is worse. He would move him on in a couple of seasons time and we would be back to square one.
Two seasons of Haaland would be better than none at all, or worse, two seasons of him as a rag.
Nope I rather keep the striker. The rags couldn't sign Sancho I'm not concerned about Haaland going there.Two seasons of Haaland would be better than none at all, or worse, two seasons of him as a rag.
Sir Joe Aguero
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 3,439
So potentially 2 years of success and then sell for a massive profit?Raiola is worse. He would move him on in a couple of seasons time and we would be back to square one.
No way will Dortmund let him go this late in the window. Or is there a buy out clause?Fuck this 'holistic' shit and just buy him next year, agents fee or no agents fee. He's a City fan and one of the few readily available strikers who would consistently get 30 goals a season. Fits the Prem perfectly. Instead I bet we piss 50mil each on a few strikers with 8 goals but can make short passes.
We are going for honours keeping our key players are essential.So potentially 2 years of success and then sell for a massive profit?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.