B
B
blueinsa
Guest
Yes please, because they need exposing for there views and do not belong in office. They do not represent me or my beliefs.
So fire away,
Burgon for a start.
Yes please, because they need exposing for there views and do not belong in office. They do not represent me or my beliefs.
So fire away,
Burgon for a start.
You said you could provide a list. So provide it. I am not denying it exists I want to see the list so I know who is on it.I'm being asked to verify a statement that is now a given, denial is evident here.
Burgon. what did he do?
I want to know, that is why I am asking for this list.If you dont know or rather dont want to admit there is no point in further discussion here Rascal.
I want to know, that is why I am asking for this list.
FFS if I didn't want to know I would ignore it.
Walker yes, I know what she did, obviously not right thinking Jews financed the slave trade.Shah, Livingston, Walker....there is more!
I genuinely don't know what Burgon has done. I don't know everything.Rascal its telling that you dont know already given your grasp of politics and the affairs of the labour party and its MP's on the left that where Corbyns biggest allies.
Im out. Its yet another poisonous thread in what has became a poisonous forum.
I want to know, that is why I am asking for this list.
FFS if I didn't want to know I would ignore it.
No Sir Kier - he is surely guilty by association as a member of JC's shadow cabinet? Somebody needs to ask him if he thought there was no problem or he was happy to be part of it as a member of the shadow cabinet under JC.![]()
Labour Party
antisemitism.org
Here's a list of the accused and the accusations for you pal make of it what you will.
Not at all, it's not okay at all but that doesn't mean we tar all one and the same. It's certainly unfair on the membership because many of those people will be innocent and naive to the internal goings on within Labour.Shootings of black people by police in the USA only involve a small minority of a large population of black people. So that's ok is it?
Deputy Rayner is on there .... along with a couple of dead peopleNo Sir Kier - he is surely guilty by association as a member of JC's shadow cabinet? Somebody needs to ask him if he thought there was no problem or he was happy to be part of it as a member of the shadow cabinet under JC.
Yes that would be the islamaphobic tories, someone does an incredible job if keeping that low key in the press. Corbyn despises a regime that kills children climbing fences, that bombs indiscriminently and has a seemingly unhealthy influence with certain foreign govts...does that make him anti sematic? If so, I'm guilty as wellThis thread is daft.
Though it has shown some on were very eager to get this report so they could go on a tirade of anti labour guff or dare I say gloat.
- The report was about complaints made that were well publisised at the time.
- The result is a mix of confirmations there were problems with anti-semitism and the response to it along with a recognitoon it was slowly being improved on compared to 2016 NEC
- 3 things were said to have broken Equality laws
- Someone was always getting suspended as a result of this
- Corbyn once again proved he is weak at reading a situation and got only himself to blame with his statement.
Nothing today was new or shocking and the results are pretty much as expected it really changes nothing in relation to labour today where since Jan has removed the corbyn eliment and all accusations that the party is still antisemetic.
Unless some try to push corbyn to be re-apointed this will be a memory come next week.
Only winners here are the tories who are out of the headlines for a day or two.
This thread is daft.
Though it has shown some on were very eager to get this report so they could go on a tirade of anti labour guff or dare I say gloat.
- The report was about complaints made that were well publisised at the time.
- The result is a mix of confirmations there were problems with anti-semitism and the response to it along with a recognitoon it was slowly being improved on compared to 2016 NEC
- 3 things were said to have broken Equality laws
- Someone was always getting suspended as a result of this
- Corbyn once again proved he is weak at reading a situation and got only himself to blame with his statement.
Nothing today was new or shocking and the results are pretty much as expected it really changes nothing in relation to labour today where since Jan has removed the corbyn eliment and all accusations that the party is still antisemetic.
Unless some try to push corbyn to be re-apointed this will be a memory come next week.
Only winners here are the tories who are out of the headlines for a day or two.
Gerald Kaufman is on there list, a son of Polish Jews. He is there because he criticised Israel. I know little about Israel to be honest, its a country in the middle east I don't get involved with and I used to steer clear of the Israel/Palestine debates on here because I simply did not know enough to get involved.![]()
Labour Party
antisemitism.org
Here's a list of the accused and the accusations for you pal make of it what you will.
It's a funny one all this Anti Semtic & Racism by leaders of the party. Now take Boris, Labelled a Racist by many on here, Including P.B actually and rightfully too. So if any of the the Right defend him as not being a Racist or even no Islamaphobia in the party will they be labelled the same as Rascal?Yes that would be the islamaphobic tories, someone does an incredible job if keeping that low key in the press. Corbyn despises a regime that kills children climbing fences, that bombs indiscriminently and has a seemingly unhealthy influence with certain foreign govts...does that make him anti sematic? If so, I'm guilty as well
It's not old news because those same people accused of turning a blind eye (and worse) to antisemitism are still in the Labour Party and among other reasons, that's why this report matters.
Unless the whip is removed from them, I can see a lot of anti-racists struggling to vote for them.