Status
Not open for further replies.
Because it's bollocks. You can't cry wolf for 4 years and then act shocked that people refuse to continue to publicise your insane rants. There is zero evidence of corruption in this election. He's already had about 6 lawsuits laughed out of court in the last day or so.
Absolutely, but I've not known the press not report something like this before. I agree that it's no more a substantial case than was presented to the lower courts, but the bbc for example finds some rather odd things apparently more newsworthy and it doesn't even feature in its 'what happens next' piece on the process involved in the orange one packing his things and leaving.
 
I'm just intrigued as to why people who have no understanding of the US culture and haven't even visited the place should think the rest of us should hear their view on who should be president lol.

Well reading this thread is voluntary, are your neighbours door stepping you and making you listen to their opinions?
 
That is called jumping the shark

To think i thought he was a good guy for his handling of 9/11

He's always been a shifty c*nt, even during 9/11. He mad a sh*t ton of money off the back of that.

Always worth remembering that Giuliani refused to upgrade fire brigade radios for 7 years after they were found to be defective in the 1994 world trade centre bombing, but refused to, and the fire brigade union blame him for the death of all 343 firefighters on 9/11.
 
Absolutely, but I've not known the press not report something like this before. I agree that it's no more a substantial case than was presented to the lower courts, but the bbc for example finds some rather odd things apparently more newsworthy and it doesn't even feature in its 'what happens next' piece on the process involved in the orange one packing his things and leaving.
Yawn
 
Absolutely, but I've not known the press not report something like this before. I agree that it's no more a substantial case than was presented to the lower courts, but the bbc for example finds some rather odd things apparently more newsworthy and it doesn't even feature in its 'what happens next' piece on the process involved in the orange one packing his things and leaving.

News finds news more broadcastable than the ramblings of a lunatic.

If you, or anyone, wants to hear Trumps frivolous legal 'challenges' then go to InfoWars
 
News finds news more broadcastable than the ramblings of a lunatic.

If you, or anyone, wants to hear Trumps frivolous legal 'challenges' then go to InfoWars
Normally this is exactly how I would think too - it all has a flavour of Alex Jones about it. The reason i raised it was the only source I've heard about this from is Maajid Nawaz. I certainly don't have him in the lefty camp admittedly, but certainly not one of the infowars loons either. I'm assuming he's balanced and neutral on this, but more than happy to be corrected - I' don't even understand the US legal system tbh.
 
Absolutely, but I've not known the press not report something like this before. I agree that it's no more a substantial case than was presented to the lower courts, but the bbc for example finds some rather odd things apparently more newsworthy and it doesn't even feature in its 'what happens next' piece on the process involved in the orange one packing his things and leaving.
I'd stick to Fox News if I were you mate.
# Swiss Wum
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top