Status
Not open for further replies.
The Democrats don't have to go after him.

SDNY can prosecute him without the help of the federal government.
Yep — precisely what’s going to happen. Biden nor Democrats on the Federal level will not be involved. They don’t need to be. In fact I’d doubt either Biden nor Harris will mention Trump’s name again. They’ll focus on “the future of the country, not the past.” There won’t be any prosecution of whatever crimes he or his nitwit kids committed while he was President. It will all be the shit they did before — red meat for a state prosecutor.
 
I read and none of it is worth it for democratic party. For example it may be important for you to prove that he is not a billionaire but what does the party gain by doing it when he is not the President ?
The Democratic Party aren’t a law enforcement agency or a Justice Department. Prosecution of Trump will be via the federal and state agencies responsible for law enforcement and administering justice. Fuck all to do with the Democratic Party.
 
The Democrats don't have to go after him.

SDNY can prosecute him without the help of the federal government.
And the Southern District of New York is the home of the Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo, who, although he has no juice when it comes to court proceedings, certainly would enjoy watching the bastard squirm in a court in his district.
 
Do not think any of these would be pursued by democrats. Over 70 million voted for him, if you want to solidify that vote against you, go after him and risk your own administration.
Or you let him carry on his campaign from twitter and the wings constantly Undermining Biden and drumming up his base with lies and Bullshit and he goes again in 2024.

If they have the chance they have to put him down. Only then can any thing there start to heal.
 
A lot of the "I'm not a fan of Trump but..." posters missing.
They are already infesting the Biden thread like roaches. They’re in a for a loooooonnnnggg four years of Biden/Harris. I’m taking a nice long vacation from the political threads after the Inauguration, unless an important exogenous variable drags me back. These dumbass mutts can have their endless circle jerk — I’ll be comfortable knowing we have a competent, experienced leader surrounded by competent, experienced advisors even if they don’t always lean the way I do politically.
 
Are you sure this is insurance Fraud? Underinsurance isn't defrauding the Insurance provider as the risk of there being a gap between the insured value and actual value falls on the asset holder. Might be a breach of contract/misrepresentation or breach of fiduciary duty issue if he has debt against the assets and as part of that debt agreement he has agreed to insure at a minimum threshold. Could be a case of fraudulently obtaining credit if that was a condition he always intended not too keep before he entered into it.
Yes

 
Last edited:
Cy Vance still does, but he's been trying for a long time with no success - although it's possible that the SC stops backing Trump now they know he's toast.
As soon as he isn’t POTUS then Trump’s appeal is toast. It’s on the basis that a sitting President can’t be investigated. SCOTUS threw that out and let him appeal again on different ground and that’s lost in the first 5 circuits again.

There’s nothing Trump can do about that case after January.
 
Do not think any of these would be pursued by democrats. Over 70 million voted for him, if you want to solidify that vote against you, go after him and risk your own administration.
SDNY have nothing to do with the Dems. It’s a state level attorney general investigation that’s about to run into its 3rd year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top