The Scottish Politics thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Dont be silly, you are comparing a country of 5m people in Norway with a country of 67m in the UK. Just not comparable im affraid.

It's like comparing penis size.

You can't compare a smaller penis, with a larger penis. Sure they're both a penis and the larger one is flaccid and is being controlled by someone who doesn't know what they are doing and the smaller one performs much better and is internationally recognised for this.

But you just can't compare penises (at least that's what I tell the ladies).
 
OK firstly, that is wildly not true. Maybe it looks that way in a formula designed specifically to look way. But when Scottiah resource and produce is hitting the coffers of companies registered in London, then I absolutely must reject your claim.

As for the oil decommissioning, so you should. Norway has a 3 trillion oil fund, yet exported less since 1970 than Scotland has. Where then, is Scotlands 3 trillion in oil revenue? Let me tell you. When Thatcher killed the mining industry along with many others, it was that money that funded the entire London financial services industry.

So I'm sorry, don't try and tell me as a Scotsman, we are taking handouts. We never have, we never will and to say as much is as Ill-informed as it is ridiculous. I would much rather see Scotland awash with small businesses and progressive industry than large corporations avoiding their taxes and giving Tories backhanders while keeping working classes families scrapping from month to month.
You make a very true point about the oil money, and this is the reason I think an independent Scotland should be allowed to walk away from the UK debt free. This does not however address the fact that the Scottish economy presently runs at a defecit somewhere north of 9%. Your vision of a ' Scotland awash with small businesses and progressive industry' will take time to establish, so EU membership (support) will be needed unless oil prices do bounce back, or Scotland will be another Poland, or even Greece.
 
You make a very true point about the oil money, and this is the reason I think an independent Scotland should be allowed to walk away from the UK debt free. This does not however address the fact that the Scottish economy presently runs at a defecit somewhere north of 9%. Your vision of a ' Scotland awash with small businesses and progressive industry' will take time to establish, so EU membership (support) will be needed unless oil prices do bounce back, or Scotland will be another Poland, or even Greece.
Maybe England should have a referendum to break free from the sweats
 
Maybe England should have a referendum to break free from the sweats
There is actually some suggestion the at if the English had voted in the last referendum they would already be independent. We've had quite a lot of Scottish politicians ruling us over the last few decades which they are more than welcome to repatriate!
 
OK firstly, that is wildly not true. Maybe it looks that way in a formula designed specifically to look way. But when Scottiah resource and produce is hitting the coffers of companies registered in London, then I absolutely must reject your claim.

As for the oil decommissioning, so you should. Norway has a 3 trillion oil fund, yet exported less since 1970 than Scotland has. Where then, is Scotlands 3 trillion in oil revenue? Let me tell you. When Thatcher killed the mining industry along with many others, it was that money that funded the entire London financial services industry.

So I'm sorry, don't try and tell me as a Scotsman, we are taking handouts. We never have, we never will and to say as much is as Ill-informed as it is ridiculous. I would much rather see Scotland awash with small businesses and progressive industry than large corporations avoiding their taxes and giving Tories backhanders while keeping working classes families scrapping from month to month.
10/10.
you should post on this thread a little more mate.
Just don’t mention the Barnett formulae.

(oh hell I just did but I think I got away with it).
 
And when it goes wrong you will be led by just the SNP with no other effective option on the ballot paper. That is a poor thought by anyones standard.
well at least we will have voted for it rather than being governed by a Tory party that hasn’t won any election in Scotland for over half a century.
But it won’t go ‘wrong’ it will be difficult and have bumps but there is no reason why we shouldn’t ’prosper mightily’. And I would fully expect that there will be Scottish political parties of all hue to vote for. You see you make the mistake of believing that the SNP = independence. It doesn’t. Independence is what many in Scotland wish for. The SNP is simply a vehicle to achieve it.
 
There is actually some suggestion the at if the English had voted in the last referendum they would already be independent. We've had quite a lot of Scottish politicians ruling us over the last few decades which they are more than welcome to repatriate!

I know it isn't what you meant, but just to avoid conclusion, the English did vote in the last referendum, all those living in Scotland.
You would be surprised at how many voted for it as well.
 
well at least we will have voted for it rather than being governed by a Tory party that hasn’t won any election in Scotland for over half a century.
But it won’t go ‘wrong’ it will be difficult and have bumps but there is no reason why we shouldn’t ’prosper mightily’. And I would fully expect that there will be Scottish political parties of all hue to vote for. You see you make the mistake of believing that the SNP = independence. It doesn’t. Independence is what many in Scotland wish for. The SNP is simply a vehicle to achieve it.
The worrying thing for me is that with the collapse of Labour in Scotland I wonder if even the 22yrs of Labour govt we had in the 20th Century can be replicated in the 21st. We (England) are now a one party state :-(
 
You make a very true point about the oil money, and this is the reason I think an independent Scotland should be allowed to walk away from the UK debt free. This does not however address the fact that the Scottish economy presently runs at a defecit somewhere north of 9%. Your vision of a ' Scotland awash with small businesses and progressive industry' will take time to establish, so EU membership (support) will be needed unless oil prices do bounce back, or Scotland will be another Poland, or even Greece.

Well said. I would say however, that the Scottish government's defecit figures are based on an economy essentially modelled for our much larger neighbour down South.

I absolutely agree however the first years will be hard and we will take the brunt of that. Dock improvement for exports, funding all of our own road improvements, costs to set up federal banks and government departments that have traditionally been at WM.

But it can't be much harder than constant austerity and mis management. We also won't have Tory corruption (Alastair Burt blocking private members bills for outdated NHS patents costing hundreds of millions for example) and will allow us to renegotiate key costs, which will absolutely bring down costs. Tories care more for donors and vested interests than the good of the nation - that we can't deny.

The purpose of independence is to tailor our economy to Scotland and her resources and industries. We then don't pay towards massive costs such as trident and can strike trade deals based on our key resources, meaning we get better prices for what we export, rather than what the UK deems relevant. The Tories selling fishing rights in Scottish waters being a perfect example, then bizarrely blaming Europe.

The Barnett formula also includes the profits going straight to London, which is every bank, insurer and corporation in the country. They make profit from all over the country, including Scotland and absorb it into corporate London, so the rest of the country will always be in deficit. As soon as they stop receiving profits from Scotland and instead these profits go to; for example, Glasgow, there is an instant shift to that 9%.
 
Last edited:
well at least we will have voted for it rather than being governed by a Tory party that hasn’t won any election in Scotland for over half a century.
But it won’t go ‘wrong’ it will be difficult and have bumps but there is no reason why we shouldn’t ’prosper mightily’. And I would fully expect that there will be Scottish political parties of all hue to vote for. You see you make the mistake of believing that the SNP = independence. It doesn’t. Independence is what many in Scotland wish for. The SNP is simply a vehicle to achieve it.
You have been governed by the party that won the UK elections a country that you are part of with one in four Scottish voters happy with the winner. This old moan that you didnt vote for them is getting very tired. Surely you dont need to be reminded that its what happens in democatic societies, we dont always get what we want individually.
 
You have been governed by the party that won the UK elections a country that you are part of with one in four Scottish voters happy with the winner. This old moan that you didnt vote for them is getting very tired. Surely you dont need to be reminded that its what happens in democatic societies, we dont always get what we want individually.
Its a union of consent mate not a dictatorship. If the majority of people in Scotland want to break from the Union then thats exactly what should happen. Not sure how you can argue against that. That is democracy too.
 
The purpose of independence is to tailor our economy to Scotland and her resources and industries. We then don't pay towards massive costs such as trident and can strike trade deals based on our key resources, meaning we get better prices for what we export, rather than what the UK deems relevant. The Tories selling fishing rights in Scottish waters being a perfect example, then bizarrely blaming Europe.
I absolutely agree however the first years will be hard and we will take the brunt of that. Dock improvement for exports, funding all of our own road improvements, costs to set up federal banks and government departments that have traditionally been at WM.

One criticism I have of the SNP is not doing enough now to ready the economy for independence. There is a great deal of stuff in the SGC report of a couple of years ago that could be put in place now before any vote. A concerted effort to attract immigration would be a good start.

I would like to see a place on the CABINET for an able minister to start the detailed planning now, we need to to get the best people pointed at this if we are to avoid a similar shambles to the implementation of Brexit. There is a lot to learn from Brexit. Not just that it was a wrong decision but the way that it was implemented was farcical. At least some of the current problems could have been avoided by the proper planning and testing.

A great deal could be done over the next couple of years to show visible evidence that we have an approach and plan that 1). convinces those that are still on the fence and tending towards the easier option of status quo and 2). gives us a clear plan and implementation strategy when the referendum is won.
 
Its a union of consent mate not a dictatorship. If the majority of people in Scotland want to break from the Union then thats exactly what should happen. Not sure how you can argue against that. That is democracy too.

Precisely... the arguments used by Boris et al that were used to justify Brexit will be turned upon them in the next few months... only Europe kept out of the Brexit referendum and let the UK decide - I doubt very much if the UK will keep out of a Scottish referendum and let Scotland decide.
 
You have been governed by the party that won the UK elections a country that you are part of with one in four Scottish voters happy with the winner. This old moan that you didnt vote for them is getting very tired. Surely you dont need to be reminded that its what happens in democatic societies, we dont always get what we want individually.

You are totally right, in context.

Should Scotland have a choice of changing the context though, and what should it choose, that is really the question. And can/would it afford it or would it be worth it.

And I know we already had that choice and made it in only 2014, and it is irritating to many that it is still on the table.

But it is on the table, because Brexit has massively distorted the context, to the point it is unrecognisable. And because the people voted in parties offering that choice twice in a row now since 2014 (four times in a row if you include the GEs).



And before you go on your usual 'what about the north of england then' point, ir comes down to the Nation vs Region arguement, which fucking irritates as much as Nicola irritates you. It is a fundamental refusal to understand the Union as a one of four nations. And that too comes into the choice of continuing in that context or not.
 
As soon as they stop receiving profits from Scotland and instead these profits go to; for example, Glasgow, there is an instant shift to that 9%.

There would be an instant fucking shift to that 9%, if we had a pound for every time we heard 'if England got a vote on Scottish Independence you'd have got it by now'.

Which they did btw. With Brexit.
 
You have been governed by the party that won the UK elections a country that you are part of with one in four Scottish voters happy with the winner. This old moan that you didnt vote for them is getting very tired. Surely you dont need to be reminded that its what happens in democatic societies, we dont always get what we want individually.

Btw, I don't moan about not voting for the Tory party but getting them as a government.

What I do moan about however, is not voting for Brexit, and getting it anyway. As something of that constitutional magnitude should absolutely have been on an all nations are equal basis, and not the sum of the biggest mass. Not just for Scotland btw, N.I too.

And whatever technicalities or definitions of sovereignty you choose to justify it, won't change how I feel about it.

The fact that it didn't happen, when requested by the elected leaders of more than one nation, pissed all over the concept of the Union for me.
 
You have been governed by the party that won the UK elections a country that you are part of with one in four Scottish voters happy with the winner. This old moan that you didnt vote for them is getting very tired. Surely you dont need to be reminded that its what happens in democatic societies, we dont always get what we want individually.
So let me get this straight. 75% of us never vote for Tories since 1955, but we have to suck it up? A party that is alien to us in every regard, apart from that 25%, who actually get the people they want. Now we have probably the most inept, corrupt shower of bastards ever to hold power, and that's in a strong field of many other Tory regimes. We have the absolute right to say, if the rest of you are happy to be shafted and taken for fools, crack on, but we have had enough. And we have had enough. If anyone is in a partnership, relationship, or union, that isn't working, that's main partner is an anathema to everything we believe, you don't keep it. There is always anxiety at breakups, but you know it needs to happen. People get cold feet sometimes and that may well happen again, but, we need to do it, but more important than that is we absolutely have the right to say fuck this. We have said that, so after we sort out the CD collection, argue over the dog, put the house on the market, we are hopefully off, but off in a way that tries to accommodate each party and hopefully, we both go on to be happier and still pals who look out for each other. England has chosen a path we can't walk on. That is your right, but not walking on it, is ours.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top