Harry Kane

[ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN]

Theres a meltdown happening right now online just by us being mentioned. Rival fans all think he coming to us.

And this just makes it so much fun

 

[manimanc]

If only it wasn't in Stockport though, eh?

;-)

I know. A horrible blot on the Cheshire skyline :)

 

[I'm Blue]

Think 50m, Jesus & Sterling would be satisfy all parties.

Sterling would be deployed as a RW (fits his abilities) & Jesus would get a run as the main man in attack.

Sterling is originally from london too, so doubt he’d be against that move.

Wouldn’t satisfy me.
Stupid idea.
So we pay £50m and then still need a striker and winger?
Fuck that.

 

[balotelli's back pocket]

Not sure I'd go as far as to say it's happening, but that's a pretty woolly statement from Spurs.

I should have made it clear - maybe not to us, but he's definitely leaving and they're resigned to it IMO.

 

[jimharri]

I know. A horrible blot on the Cheshire skyline :)

I can imagine!

 

[Scottish Cityzen]

I've been totally ok with Aguero leaving for a while, even arguing it is the right thing to do.

But 100m, 120m, or whatever itveould cost, to sign kane at his age, honestly, would rather keep aguero another year or even two. Then replace him properly. Kane is a short term replacement.

Mid-term replacement, Lewandowski still going strong at 33.

He’s not my first choice but to put a player with his predatory instincts in a team of our quality could generate something ridiculous, even Messi-type numbers.

If (big if) a deal can be done that isn’t outrageous and the club feels they can afford then he would almost certainly be a phenomenal signing.

 

[Taylor]

I would love us to sign Haaland but would I go for Kane if haaland didn't come? Damn right I would

 

[wolviedinho]

I can’t understand not wanting him. Guaranteed success. He’s not 31. He’s years left in him. Also add in that if we sign him then a rival doesn’t get him. Wouldn’t like him in the Chelsea line up. I can’t see us getting Haaland this time round now that Dortmund have gotten into the champs league so Kane is the next best option.

I agree. We also didn’t do too badly with Fern at 28. 36 now and still the master.

 

[Charlesfarsbar]

Think 50m, Jesus & Sterling would be satisfy all parties.

Sterling would be deployed as a RW (fits his abilities) & Jesus would get a run as the main man in attack.

Sterling is originally from london too, so doubt he’d be against that move.

Sterling isn’t going to Spurs at this stage of his career

Jesus could be an option that could make sense but again a massive step down for him

 

[WestGorton]

I don't think we should rule out PSG making a run for him, especially with the Poch connection

Good shout

 

[Nellies left peg]

Will have to wait till 10am tomorrow on talkshite to find out where he's heading as the all knowing Shouty man is obviously in the know

 

[AliAdel]

Wouldn’t satisfy me.
Stupid idea.
So we pay £50m and then still need a striker and winger?
Fuck that.

Why would we need a winger or a striker?

Torres would cover Kane, and we got bernardo, mahrez and foden. More than enough.

 

[p.taker]

Think 50m, Jesus & Sterling would be satisfy all parties.

Sterling would be deployed as a RW (fits his abilities) & Jesus would get a run as the main man in attack.

Sterling is originally from london too, so doubt he’d be against that move.

Neither of those players would move to Spurs. Not a chance.

 

[Long Slow Goodbye]

Maybe Rooney was a bad comparison, it does smell like an RVP though, he's got 2-3 years left at the top but eventually the injuries will take there toll, father time is undefeated.

It’s like Van Persie, in the sense that whoever gets him probably wins the league next season.

Pep’s waited 5 years to finally get rid of Aguero, so I can’t see him replacing him with another one-dimensional, direct goalscorer like Haaland - Kane offers the goals of an elite orthodox #9, with the all-round game of a false one; he’d be our most complete striker since Tevez.

 

[Inter Me Nan]

View attachment 17123Looks like they’re getting vexed on the Spurs forum!

 

[Ashleymcduff]

Would score 30 plus league goals for us in next 5 seasons . Sign him up

 

[DMA's]

This is identical to the CB nonsense last summer.

Everyone was demanding Koulibaly over anyone else. City opted for Dias and that turned out rather nicely.

It is nothing like that situation. Kane is prem proven striker enetering his peak years, koulibaly was a cb arguably past his prime from a foreign league and we had no idea how he would adapt to the prem. Kane is one of the top 3 strikers in the world

 

[Dr Jacoby]

I didn’t realise he was only 27.

 

[paulchapo]

Only just realised there was a poll on this. Imagine not wanting the guy top of the goals and assists chart, the guy who scores for fun every single season and above all else...can take a pen. 60% of those on here are completely off their tits (less than I originally thought).

It is a couple of things putting people off. One is his age, which in July will be twenty eight. When you add his dodgy ankles to that, pus the fact Spurs will want 100+ million it's a big gamble.

 

[OB1]

Not sure I'd go as far as to say it's happening, but that's a pretty woolly statement from Spurs.

It's not going to convince anyone he's staying there.