Ref Watch

Yep commentator desperately screaming no penalty great tackle when Jesus was wiped out also disgraceful. How is that acceptable commentary?
It's acceptable to the City-hating morons that seem to have been let into the Amex last night and the host of cretins who cheered along with it. Oh, and whoever that inmate from the nearest loony bin was who was entrusted with a whistle.
 
Some of these decisions made against city are given very quickly and never seem to be scrutinised as much as others including off side decisions, the non pen on jesus, I've still not seen a close up and if the defender gets a slight touch on the ball, the ball was still in play but jesus cannot get to it as he was taken out, as for cavani's goal they are just guessing.
 
That last night is the worst officiating I've seen us have, and we've had some belters!
Good job we override it by being mint.
That match could so easily have been one where the three points were crucial. I bet the club is breathing that the title was in the bag before Attwell delivered his masterclass.
 
Not only is that not a foul by Stones, it is a foul by their goalkeeper on Stones. He jumps on Stones' head. The fact the he is a goalkeeper doesn't give him immunity from the Laws of the Game. He isn't allowed to clear out everything in front of him in an attempt to get the ball.
492658b804ce84212a8c9574ad1e107c.jpg
 
That match could so easily have been one where the three points were crucial. I bet the club is breathing that the title was in the bag before Attwell delivered his masterclass.
to be honest, I think they took the opportunity to put that on BT, stick in between Sky's 2 games and load the deck with Attwell and Moss because the game didn't matter. It's exactly the sort of game that's easy to mess with without drawing unwanted scrutiny. The cover-up afterwards says it all.
 
Some of these decisions made against city are given very quickly and never seem to be scrutinised as much as others including off side decisions, the non pen on jesus, I've still not seen a close up and if the defender gets a slight touch on the ball, the ball was still in play but jesus cannot get to it as he was taken out, as for cavani's goal they are just guessing.
The Cavani goal had the advantage of being scored by a home player at The Swamp. He was offside when the goalie kicked it, Fernandes wasn't, but he missed it, and that should render Cavani offide. But, hey ho, that's the way PiGMOL do it!
 
In an absolute melee of unbelievably shite decisions by that cheating twat atwell tonight the most baffling was when he gave a foul against Stones on their keeper just because he dropped it, fucking useless bent bastard and Moss can fuck off aswell.

VAR is meant to be there to improve the game and come to the correct decisions, all it is is bent bastards backing up whatever decision the other bent bastards have made on the pitch

Law 12: Fouls and Misconduct​


IMPEDING THE PROGRESS OF AN OPPONENT WITHOUT CONTACT

Impeding the progress of an opponent means moving into the opponent’s path to obstruct, block, slow down or force a change of direction when the ball is not within playing distance of either player.

All players have a right to their position on the field of play; being in the way of an opponent is not the same as moving into the way of an opponent.

A player may shield the ball by taking a position between an opponent and the ball if the ball is within playing distance and the opponent is not held off with the arms or body. If the ball is within playing distance, the player may be fairly charged by an opponent.

They need to brush up on their knowledge, Stones stood there is not an offence, so we''l put that under "we don't even know the rules/we'll make it up as we go along to suit", take your pick.
 
Not only is that not a foul by Stones, it is a foul by their goalkeeper on Stones. He jumps on Stones' head. The fact the he is a goalkeeper doesn't give him immunity from the Laws of the Game. He isn't allowed to clear out everything in front of him in an attempt to get the ball.
492658b804ce84212a8c9574ad1e107c.jpg
Ah, but these LotG only apply when we have a knowledgeable ref with the bottle to call what the Laws demand of him (Are there any?). Last night we had the GhostGoalWhistlingWanker. I'm sure that Attwell would walk down his local high street and anyone who stumbles would have the satisfaction of the nearest shopper being carded!
 

Law 12: Fouls and Misconduct​


IMPEDING THE PROGRESS OF AN OPPONENT WITHOUT CONTACT

Impeding the progress of an opponent means moving into the opponent’s path to obstruct, block, slow down or force a change of direction when the ball is not within playing distance of either player.

All players have a right to their position on the field of play; being in the way of an opponent is not the same as moving into the way of an opponent.

A player may shield the ball by taking a position between an opponent and the ball if the ball is within playing distance and the opponent is not held off with the arms or body. If the ball is within playing distance, the player may be fairly charged by an opponent.

They need to brush up on their knowledge, Stones stood there is not an offence, so we''l put that under "we don't even know the rules/we'll make it up as we go along to suit", take your pick.
But they do have a law that they always fall back on - If a player falls to the ground it could be a foul so nobody will argue 'cos I've got a pair of coloured cards in my pocket.

It's a great get out of jail for those who are pretty clueless, even with the aid of a TV screen.
 
I am always disappointed when City lose, but I can accept that we can't possibly win all games. When Leeds beat us recently, when they were down to ten men, and totally against the run of play, you just have to accept that they rode their luck, and grabbed a late winner. When United beat us, it was hard to take, but we played poorly that day.

But sometimes, the defeat is down to other factors, and yesterday's was definitely an undeserved defeat.

Remember when Palace drew with us a few years ago to end our unbeaten run? There were a few very suspicious decisions on that day. They had a late penalty to win, but missed it. As I recall, they should have had a player sent off too.

Moss was the referee that day. He has links with Hodgson's agent, Colquhoun, who is also linked to gambling syndicates. I'm convinced Moss is one of the go to guys they turn to when they need a certain result. He is physically unfit - I'd be surprised if he legitimately passes the referee fitness tests. Mason is another unfit and incompetent referee.

And what happens when they retire? The untouchable Riley gives them a cushy job as VAR expert, so they can continue helping to deliver unexpected results at the behest of their hidden paymasters.
 
I’ve just seen the red card from last night for the first time, welbeck literally threw himself over cancelo’s bloody shoulder !!

As for the ‘foul’ by stones that’s almost as bad.

What worries me though is that the potentially career ending studs high tackle on Mr Whippy is disgraceful to say the least - how that is just a yellow I don’t know:
 
Some of these decisions made against city are given very quickly and never seem to be scrutinised as much as others including off side decisions, the non pen on jesus, I've still not seen a close up and if the defender gets a slight touch on the ball, the ball was still in play but jesus cannot get to it as he was taken out, as for cavani's goal they are just guessing.
The offside for Brighton's 3rd seemed to deserve closer attention from VAR, they've had the grid-lines out for less tight decisions. The Jesus one was a pen, defender's tackle was over the top of the ball and as you say even if he got a slight touch he still wipes out the attacker with the follow through and we've seen red cards issued recently for doing just that.
 
I am always disappointed when City lose, but I can accept that we can't possibly win all games. When Leeds beat us recently, when they were down to ten men, and totally against the run of play, you just have to accept that they rode their luck, and grabbed a late winner. When United beat us, it was hard to take, but we played poorly that day.

But sometimes, the defeat is down to other factors, and yesterday's was definitely an undeserved defeat.

Remember when Palace drew with us a few years ago to end our unbeaten run? There were a few very suspicious decisions on that day. They had a late penalty to win, but missed it. As I recall, they should have had a player sent off too.

Moss was the referee that day. He has links with Hodgson's agent, Colquhoun, who is also linked to gambling syndicates. I'm convinced Moss is one of the go to guys they turn to when they need a certain result. He is physically unfit - I'd be surprised if he legitimately passes the referee fitness tests. Mason is another unfit and incompetent referee.

And what happens when they retire? The untouchable Riley gives them a cushy job as VAR expert, so they can continue helping to deliver unexpected results at the behest of their hidden paymasters.

Tony Bloom who owns Brighton also owns Sportslizard. Uk's biggest sports betting syndicate. I wonder what the odds were for Brighton to win when they were 2 down
 
I am always disappointed when City lose, but I can accept that we can't possibly win all games. When Leeds beat us recently, when they were down to ten men, and totally against the run of play, you just have to accept that they rode their luck, and grabbed a late winner. When United beat us, it was hard to take, but we played poorly that day.

But sometimes, the defeat is down to other factors, and yesterday's was definitely an undeserved defeat.

Remember when Palace drew with us a few years ago to end our unbeaten run? There were a few very suspicious decisions on that day. They had a late penalty to win, but missed it. As I recall, they should have had a player sent off too.

Moss was the referee that day. He has links with Hodgson's agent, Colquhoun, who is also linked to gambling syndicates. I'm convinced Moss is one of the go to guys they turn to when they need a certain result. He is physically unfit - I'd be surprised if he legitimately passes the referee fitness tests. Mason is another unfit and incompetent referee.

And what happens when they retire? The untouchable Riley gives them a cushy job as VAR expert, so they can continue helping to deliver unexpected results at the behest of their hidden paymasters.
It genuinely worries me that Mason has been given a VAR job, you only have to look at that tramp Peter Walton to see they don't lose whatever grudge they have, the club should be all over Masons appointment, the fat, cheating Phil Mitchell wannabe.
 
The breathtaking level of disregard by commentators like Townsend for what is there for all to see is bonkers. The Jesus incident was a reckless tackle where the ball may have brushed the underside of the defenders foot on his way to take out Jesus. I cannot conceive any situation where they would not be up screaming penalty if it was one of their paymasters.
 
Ah, but these LotG only apply when we have a knowledgeable ref with the bottle to call what the Laws demand of him (Are there any?). Last night we had the GhostGoalWhistlingWanker. I'm sure that Attwell would walk down his local high street and anyone who stumbles would have the satisfaction of the nearest shopper being carded!
Unless they are wearing any kind of City colours.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top