TheBlueDune
Well-Known Member
As BFS says, if you don't dive then you don't get. Players exaggerate the effect of the touch. Or they deliberately con the ref.he did dive...
As BFS says, if you don't dive then you don't get. Players exaggerate the effect of the touch. Or they deliberately con the ref.he did dive...
Is that 635 in two hours?This is just patently nonsense - last night England made 635 passes. City on average last season made 675 per game. Burnley made an average of 365.
Occasionally, England go long, and we utilise set pieces well, both of which essentially make us less predictable and a better football side. All our goals this tournament (i think) have come off the back of decent build up play and either short low passes / crosses or short stand up crosses. We are not lumping it into the box aimlessly.
We aren't defensive in the traditional sense, in that we don't simply park the bus and play on the counter. We have two defensive mids and for most of each game, we have dictated the pace of the game and (without checking) i believe we have had more possession.
Last night, according to Opta, Schmeichel kept out 2.9 goals, according to expected goals on target (xGOT) measurements. That’s more than any other keeper at the Euros in the last 41 years at least. Again, not evidence of a team that is defensive but somewhat fortunate - if anything it is the complete opposite.
Southgate is pragmatic, but he also has a group of attacking players who are mobile and given license to express themselves at the right time. Its not tiki taka wankball, passing with no purpose but its effective and at times exciting to watch. To suggest they are long ball merchants is palpably incorrect.
How many world cups and euros have other teams benefited from decisions? I would say every single one, about time after Maradona handballs and Lampards ball over the line England got one. It’s a long time since Hirst’s ball over the line decision.doesn't mean it was correct tho
I wondered if there was an element of two half pens. We didn't get the first (Kane) so we got the second. If the Kane incident had not happened, would we have got the Raz foul?Kane should have had a penalty, but as usual VAR stays with Refs decision
Beckenbauer from stage left: "It was not a goal."How many world cups and euros have other teams benefited from decisions? I would say every single one, about time after Maradona handballs and Lampards ball over the line England got one. It’s a long time since Hirst’s ball over the line decision.
I was thinking about Pickford and he is a fine Keeper, but perhaps unfairly we know measure every keepers kicking etc in comparison to Eddies and no keeper in the world does it like it Eddy.Our only downside last night was our keeper, his kicking and throwing output let him down.
back 4 were great.
Kane although his penalty was poor, his overall play was great.
Taking off a player who was on as a sub and who wasn't injured could, in some ways, be considered brave. I certainly wouldn't have done it.Don't know about brave,but the end result vindicated it.
Except Southgate trusts Sterling to also cover his defensive duties effectively.Terrible management. Sterling should have gone at that point. Ran his bollocks off all game. Now you’ve shot the confidence of a fantastic player.
Top management ey
Two half pens add up to one actual pen? Love it, I don’t know if that is actually a thing but it is a funny thought. What is a real thing is equalising a wrong decision, it happens all the time and I bet it is not written down in the official rule book.I wondered if there was an element of two half pens. We didn't get the first (Kane) so we got the second. If the Kane incident had not happened, would we have got the Raz foul?
His spot kick was saved and he got a fortunate rebound,now he his favourite for BBC sports personality of the year, unbelievable.who missed a penalty ?
That through ball to Saka was class and his general play was exceptional.
True. The stats show it was a dominant performance - England had 13 shots in the Danish penalty area - Denmark had just one. They only had six touches in the England penalty area in the whole match - most of those on the edge of the box, and none within ten yards of the goal.This is just patently nonsense - last night England made 635 passes. City on average last season made 675 per game. Burnley made an average of 365.
Occasionally, England go long, and we utilise set pieces well, both of which essentially make us less predictable and a better football side. All our goals this tournament (i think) have come off the back of decent build up play and either short low passes / crosses or short stand up crosses. We are not lumping it into the box aimlessly.
We aren't defensive in the traditional sense, in that we don't simply park the bus and play on the counter. We have two defensive mids and for most of each game, we have dictated the pace of the game and (without checking) i believe we have had more possession.
Last night, according to Opta, Schmeichel kept out 2.9 goals, according to expected goals on target (xGOT) measurements. That’s more than any other keeper at the Euros in the last 41 years at least. Again, not evidence of a team that is defensive but somewhat fortunate - if anything it is the complete opposite.
Southgate is pragmatic, but he also has a group of attacking players who are mobile and given license to express themselves at the right time. Its not tiki taka wankball, passing with no purpose but its effective and at times exciting to watch. To suggest they are long ball merchants is palpably incorrect.
Depends on your definition of fine, he is OK but many national sides have a better keeper. It’s a shame England could not have persuaded Schmeichel to chose England!I was thinking about Pickford and he is a fine Keeper, but perhaps unfairly we know measure every keepers kicking etc in comparison to Eddies and no keeper in the world does it like it Eddy.