Italy v England | Euro 2020 Final

What will the result be?


  • Total voters
    396
  • Poll closed .
Not a fan of Sterling’s myself but he was England’s best player during the tournament. Even Sterling’s biggest fan wouldn’t be confident in him taking a penalty. Suppose they need something to talk about but a player who’s poor at penalties not taking one really shouldn’t be a debate today.

I can’t stand boregate as a manager but one thing I bet he was thorough on was practising pens. Rashford is clearly a decent penalty taker but shit happens.
Yeah, Rashford did everything right, right up until he kicked the ball. Which I know is the main bit of it. But you could see why he was taking it. Even seasoned penalty pro Jorginho missed his, so anyone can fuck it up.
 
Once Italy turned up they were in charge. You nearly got away with it when it went to penalties, but it wasn't to be. Italy deserved it. To be honest, I thought you were piss poor, apart from the opening 20 minutes. You never went for it, tried to hold onto the lead and paid the price. Awful penalties where your guys shat it, but you didn't deserve it.

I want to start a national petition that demands that thick, inarticulate, bumbling **** Ferdinfanny never gets on a football show again. He is such an embarrassment.


Well done Italy..not at your best but still too good.


Let the Scapegoating begin.
I will sign your petition.
 
I think four or five people have responded to this. Only one has come up with an actual name. Everyone else has come up with some fictional ideal manager that only exists in their imagination. So good luck with that, I guess.
It doesn’t go hand in hand does it. We don’t have to have a manager to replace him in order to know he needs replacing. We could also say any name in football worldwide. They’d have had as much experience or success as Southgate before he was appointed so what’s the difference?
 
Another thing for the Southgate lovers, him picking the penalty takers is madness in my eyes. Forcing players to take a pen if they want to or not is a recipe for disaster surely. If a player is confident enough to take one, let them. I have no doubt Sterling would want to take one, despite being shit at them for us he still steps up.
 
Yes for the better, we got a foothold in the game after going to a back 4, Italians were all over us with the back 5. It took him a long time to change it mind
Yep. I get some of the criticism of Southgate such as not changing things a bit earlier when Italy were on top, perhaps being a little too defensive in the tournament, not giving certain players enough game time, etc, but what I won't have is this notion that he "parked the bus" in the 2nd half because Italy came back into it and had us on the ropes. It always makes me laugh when people assume that a team that does well in the first half of a game and takes the lead, only for the other team to come back into it in the second half, means that the former deliberately stopped playing the way they were playing. No - that's football and the other team are actually entitled to play well themselves at some point in the game. There are passages of play where one team is dominant and then the other team come back into it. And if that latter team happens to be a very good team with a very good manager - like Italy - then they have a better chance of forcing you onto the back foot and getting back into the game. Italy pushing us back in the second half doesn't equate to us parking the bus, and if it is then that means Mancini parked the bus in the first half hour when England were causing them all sorts of problems. But he didn't - it just so happened that England started off better and Italy were struggling to get a foothold until later in the half. The second half was, in effect, a reversal of roles.
 
It doesn’t go hand in hand does it. We don’t have to have a manager to replace him in order to know he needs replacing. We could also say any name in football worldwide. They’d have had as much experience or success as Southgate before he was appointed so what’s the difference?
The difference is that you're talking about replacing a manager who has just got to a final and got to a semi-final last time, who clearly has a great relationship with the players. It reminds me of Spurs getting rid of Poch because they think he's the reason they aren't winning stuff, only to find that the proven manager they bring in to replace him is actually much shitter. It's a level of entitlement that England fans have no right to have given our history.
 
Substitutions made far too late and not playiong to the teams strengths.

Southgate just isn't up to it, I'm not an England supporter - but player for player they are better than Italy.
 
The difference is that you're talking about replacing a manager who has just got to a final and got to a semi-final last time, who clearly has a great relationship with the players. It reminds me of Spurs getting rid of Poch because they think he's the reason they aren't winning stuff, only to find that the proven manager they bring in to replace him is actually much shitter. It's a level of entitlement that England fans have no right to have given our history.
Not entitlement however not winning tournaments isn’t success is it. World Cup we probably overachieved however we literally played nobody. Played Belgium twice and lost both times then lost to Croatia.

This tournament we again played a load of shit, I’ll say it again Denmark were the highest ranked team we played before last night. Denmark. With the players at our disposal we should have done ok regardless of anything. Instead we done ok whilst playing boring defensive football despite our amazing attackers. He gets the praise for getting us there but no acknowledgement when he’s let us down. If he left England tomorrow he’d end up at somewhere like palace. That says it all.
 
But yes Southgate is good enough.

Teams he's beaten in competitive games...

Malta
Scotland
Lithuania
Slovakia
Tunisia
Panama
Sweden
Croatia
Czech Republic
Bulgaria
Montenegro
Kosovo
Iceland
Wales
Belgium
San Marino
Albania
Poland
Germany
Ukraine
Denmark


Outstanding!
 
Before the tournament I didn't think England would get past the semis but as things developed and with the benefit of an easy group and subsequent favourable draws, winning became a more and more realistic possible achievement. I would say England played well in only 2 games - Germany and Ukraine. They were merely efficient in the others - except the drab draw v Scotland - based around a very solid defence and set up.
Did Southgate get the best out of his squad - probably not. Did he show a willingness to change and adapt his tactics and players during games ? Not really. He played a limited, restrictive game based to reduce mistakes and opposition chances to a minimum.
Yesterday, after half time - when being dominated in midfield, the obvious call seemed to be to bring Grealish on. A player who can get on the ball, carry it forward and link with the forwards in areas that could hurt the Italians. He should have been on a lot earlier.
Penalties are always a lottery - could have gone either way. Pickford did well and overall had a much better tournament than I was expecting.
I don't imagine Southgate will do much different in the next World Cup. We have a group of very talented players but I I don't think we have a good enough manager.
England did well to reach the final but having got there, blew the chance to lift the trophy. Chances like that come along very rarely.
We were totally dominant against Croatia as well. The Czech game was a bit closer but we deserved the win in that one too, and created plenty in the Denmark game. The only game we rode our luck in was the Scotland game, but England were deserved winners of all our knockout games, and as good as Italy are, they can count themselves fortunate to get past Spain in the semis. Few teams play well in every single game on the way to a final, and I can't think of any other teams who deserved to be in the final more than England and Italy.
 
Yep. I get some of the criticism of Southgate such as not changing things a bit earlier when Italy were on top, perhaps being a little too defensive in the tournament, not giving certain players enough game time, etc, but what I won't have is this notion that he "parked the bus" in the 2nd half because Italy came back into it and had us on the ropes. It always makes me laugh when people assume that a team that does well in the first half of a game and takes the lead, only for the other team to come back into it in the second half, means that the former deliberately stopped playing the way they were playing. No - that's football and the other team are actually entitled to play well themselves at some point in the game. There are passages of play where one team is dominant and then the other team come back into it. And if that latter team happens to be a very good team with a very good manager - like Italy - then they have a better chance of forcing you onto the back foot and getting back into the game. Italy pushing us back in the second half doesn't equate to us parking the bus, and if it is then that means Mancini parked the bus in the first half hour when England were causing them all sorts of problems. But he didn't - it just so happened that England started off better and Italy were struggling to get a foothold until later in the half. The second half was, in effect, a reversal of roles.
Agree with that up to a point but in the second half when it became clear that an Italy goal was only a matter of time, I would have liked to see our manager react and do something even if it didn’t work. As it was, he just sat on his hands until they scored then appeared to double down on the “what we have we hold” strategy by making negative substitutions.

On the other hand we were up against one of the game’s best in-game tacticians as we know from our own experience when he was our manager.
 
Teams he's beaten in competitive games...

Malta
Scotland
Lithuania
Slovakia
Tunisia
Panama
Sweden
Croatia
Czech Republic
Bulgaria
Montenegro
Kosovo
Iceland
Wales
Belgium
San Marino
Albania
Poland
Germany
Ukraine
Denmark


Outstanding!

do you happen to know what teams he has lost to in competitive games? (in 90 mins and ET)
 
The difference is that you're talking about replacing a manager who has just got to a final and got to a semi-final last time, who clearly has a great relationship with the players. It reminds me of Spurs getting rid of Poch because they think he's the reason they aren't winning stuff, only to find that the proven manager they bring in to replace him is actually much shitter. It's a level of entitlement that England fans have no right to have given our history.

I don’t rate Southgate as a manager when it comes to tactical nous or in game management, but he is very good at building a cohesive squad that works for each other and that alone is invaluable at a tournament.

We were a penalty kick or so away from winning the bloody thing and we haven’t said that for fifty years.
 
The arrogance of Rashford with that penalty. Not remotely good enough to pull a stunt like that. Just a hype machine.
Sergio got more shit for his miss against Chelsea. At least Sergio had his fantastic career in the bank. Rashford thinks he untouchable. The rag deserves every bit of shit which imo will not materialise as it will be swept under the rag carpet
 
Another thing for the Southgate lovers, him picking the penalty takers is madness in my eyes. Forcing players to take a pen if they want to or not is a recipe for disaster surely. If a player is confident enough to take one, let them. I have no doubt Sterling would want to take one, despite being shit at them for us he still steps up.
There is zero evidence that Southgate "forced" players in taking a penalty. He confirmed he knew the first 5 before full time based on the penalty taking in training and when penalties arrived he probably asked that 5 if they were up for it and all 5 would of said yes. So no need to change the line up
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top