Utter bobbins
Well-Known Member
Desperate?Top bloke according to foden, walker,stones and sterling , which is good enough for me
Desperate?Top bloke according to foden, walker,stones and sterling , which is good enough for me
Couldn't care less about Kane - one way or another - just not a fan of your moronic mewlings.so we are not allowed to like a player that play for this club?
I though this was a football forum to discuss signings, it's apperars to be the Arry Kane fan boy site.
It really isn't, one isn't like the other. Kane isn't carrying all this baggage. You can believe what you want to though.
I would think the Haaland deal would be a lot more than 130m in total, probably 200m plus with what Haaland Snr and Rialoa would want in fees.
Really? Strikes me as a bit of a one trick pony. Seems like they've replaced Mourinho with a less successful version of MourinhoI actually thought Nuno was a good appointment, for the 10th call. I can see him doing well.
If we are going to pay 130m then we should get Haaland instead for that kind of money
At least we’ve learnt something today, you couldn’t give a shit whether we sign Kane or not, that’s nice to know from an ingenious poster such as yourself..Couldn't care less about Kane - one way or another - just not a fan of your moronic mewlings.
It’s funny when people mention £130m+ for Kane, you see comments like “just pay it, not my money”The only issue there is Haaland would require about 200m and that's without agent fee, his dad wanting a separate cut, his wage demands (about 500k per week) and a release clause inserted in his deal, with rumours of him moving every summer, all media drama aside. We're good not pursuing him.
You're another of the clueless c***s polluting the forums.At least we’ve learnt something today, you couldn’t give a shit whether we sign Kane or not, that’s nice to know from an ingenious poster such as yourself..
It’s funny when people mention £130m+ for Kane, you see comments like “just pay it, not my money”
Yet when it comes to Haaland it’s “but he wants £500k a week, agents fees”
Pay whatever it takes to get the best available for the long term, that’s Haaland.
That’s quite appropriate coming from someone like you, at least I got that mask to slip.You're another of the clueless c***s polluting the forums.
The only ones it ‘could’ upset is Kev and Raz, since they earn miles more than everyone else.High Wages upsets the whole apple cart look at Bayern now after given sane ridiculous wages Coman wants the same!
Haaland won’t move this summer just because Haaland will get silly money his agent and father will get more there cut! Oh Pep wants a premier proven striker..
The only ones it ‘could’ upset is Kev and Raz, since they earn miles more than everyone else.
Players aren’t overly upset that them 2 earn more than everyone else, it’s usually the case at most clubs that there’s a one or two top earners.
Pep also wanted Maguire.
Pep wants a quick crack at the CL, hence Kane (probably), but Haaland would offer more over a longer period and after Pep’s gone.
Bayern maybe clowns in fact they are, but the way they get the players at the price they want we could learn from.
It's not always the case but more than often is, they are flat track bullies and sometimes there is nothing wrong with that.
I’d have Haaland's bottom
Robinho....If it happens would Kane be the highest profile signing we've ever made? (Irrespective of price)
If it happens would Kane be the highest profile signing we've ever made? (Irrespective of price)