LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
What if he doesn’t want to come? Kidnap him?
the arrogance that we just expect players to want to come.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
the arrogance that we just expect players to want to come.
We've made a lot of money in sales from the academy for one, plus I believe some of last season's sales weren't accounted for until now (or something of that ilk).How are we affording these proposed transfers? Didnt we just post a huge loss and take a $650m debt facility
Kev’s earned it.Haha squad harmony. If KDB is on £375k a week, that harmony won't be destroyed with someone coming in on 'just' £25k more per week.
He didn’t start on that and has won and earned enough medals to justify that wage.
Paulmcfc2703
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 9,245
Why do you assume there was a choice?For the sums quoted I'd rather we took Haaland
LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
Course, Kane hasn’t done anything has he to justify a monster pay day transfer. The absolute irony though that everyone is calling for haaland who would cost and demand more. Who literally had done a fraction of Kane.Kev’s earned it.
He didn’t start on that and has won and earned enough medals to justify that wage.
The vote on this thread backs up your view.I think there is an underlying feeling that st Harold of Kane just isn't worth it.
McfcBibby
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Aug 2020
- Messages
- 356
- Location
- Formerly known as Bibbyblue85
- Team supported
- Manchester City
For the sums quoted I'd rather we took Haaland
What does it matter? Are you financing the deal? You can “rather we took Haaland” all you want, at the end of the day Pep wants Kane and that’s who we’ll get
What a weird reply.What if he doesn’t want to come? Kidnap him?
the arrogance that we just expect players to want to come.
I never said anything arrogant in the slightest, I said I preferred Haaland to Kane at the sums quoted, what the fuck is arrogant about that?
This is the transfer forum, to discuss who we would like to see play for our club, fuck me, some people get their knickers in a twist about all manner of things on here nowadays.
Arrogant lol fucking hell.
Should I search the Messi thread for your similar reply in there?
LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
No you said I’d rather take Haaland, like as though we have a pick of either. We don’t.What a weird reply.
I never said anything arrogant in the slightest, I said I preferred Haaland to Kane at the sums quoted, what the fuck is arrogant about that?
This is the transfer forum, to discuss who we would like to see play for our club, fuck me, some people get their knickers in a twist about all manner of things on here nowadays.
Arrogant lol fucking hell.
Should I search the Messi thread for your similar reply in there?
Lemon7277
Well-Known Member
Think it's come down to one wants to come and play for us and the other don'tFor the sums quoted I'd rather we took Haaland
GaudinoMotors
Well-Known Member
DefinitiveThe vote on this thread backs up your view.
Because I am allowed a fucking opinion, is it that hard for you to understand?What does it matter? Are you financing the deal? You can “rather we took Haaland” all you want, at the end of the day Pep wants Kane and that’s who we’ll get
It is a forum, where people discuss things they would like to see happen.
I seem to have inadvertently triggered some weirdos today.
metalblue
Well-Known Member
What if he doesn’t want to come? Kidnap him?
the arrogance that we just expect players to want to come.
Wasn’t that how the scum got Berbatov?
It was just my opinion pal, that's all no biggie.Think it's come down to one wants to come and play for us and the other don't
StillBluessinceHydeRoad
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2020
- Messages
- 2,454
- Team supported
- City
The debt facility is for CFG, not City, and is for infrastructure for the group, such as a stadium for NYCFC or training facilities in Melbourne etc. It doesn't mean City are broke!How are we affording these proposed transfers? Didnt we just post a huge loss and take a $650m debt facility
Raz has been shite all year for usRaz has put in the hard work and might get to kevs level this time , a new player coming in on a long contract at more than kev ? Ridiculous
How on earth you think he deserves to be on kevs wage I do not know!
Just pay it.The absolute irony though that everyone is calling for haaland who would cost and demand more.
That’s how it works right?
I will bold the bit that you are struggling to comprehend, the rest is some weird thing you have decided to take offence at, for whatever reason.No you said I’d rather take Haaland, like as though we have a pick of either. We don’t.
Sorry, me thinking Haaland is a better long term prospect has got you all hot and bothered.
Must be the sun.
LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
There’s just one or two on here who seem to think we can demand Haaland, that’s all. You clearly aren’t one, so sorry.I will bold the bit that you are struggling to comprehend, the rest is some weird thing you have decided to take offence at, for whatever reason.
Sorry, me thinking Haaland is a better long term prospect has got you all hot and bothered.
Must be the sun.
Anything less would be a failure especially at the crazy fees being brandied about. We have won everything else without him.
they say and pep says there is a next level and manchester city are not there yet ? maybe we are aiming high and not happy with just wining it once ?