It's Quiet Thread 15 - Txiki Blinders

Status
Not open for further replies.
banbury_blue said:
And what if we have? We obviously want the players, Pep has gone on about him previously about how good he is, Villa have a right to put a level under which they won’t sell… if it’s £100 million to secure him then fair play to Villa for standing firm, fair play to City for stumping up the money.

It’s amazing on here, previous times we’ve won the league, not advanced the squad and been accused of tight because we wont match other teams spending and you’d think the world had ended, next we’re being linked to class, and more importantly, proven players and people are going batshit crazy because they will cost a sack load of money… it’s almost like people don’t want the club to do either unless they have the absolute approval of someone that’s once won a couple of leagues on champ manager in the late 90’s
Click to expand...
So how much do you think he's worth? Because if our first bid is £100m it will take a lot more than that to get him as that is how negotiation works

Unless of course there is a release clause and the price is just that. If so we will find out

However if not I'd have expected our first bid to be more around the £60m to £70m mark

I believe we probably have made a bid and I hope we get him... just don't believe the £100m bit of the journo's story

Oh and btw I've never played champ manager in my life
 
I honestly couldn’t care less that we pay over £150 million for Kane and the same for Jack griealish honestly I’m so pleased that we city are going for these players it’s a sign of intent couldn’t give a flying f*ck of what media outlets say couldn’t give a flying f^ck about twatter says or anyone else . We’ve had our day losing Paul Stewart to Spurs , Gio to Ajax, SWP to Chelsea etc...
Fuck the lot of em’ . City doing this for us fans on pitch ... off the pitch would like to see the same endeavour.
 
wolviedinho said:
Very true. Selling clubs should be investigated for fair market value just like sponsorship deals. If we could change FFP to incorporate such an act just maybe we could tell the whole lot to fuck off. Oh and be Able to use the Sane fee for another 10 years.
Click to expand...

show me a football club that can stand alone from fans and shirt sales ?
the money men are needed in football always had been from the day dot

FFP will be all over manchester city if we sign both kane and grealish we will be seen as the devil and why
yes that right both villa and spurs will be moaning like hell to get manchester city punished.

good point you make about sane funny how one the so called elite can take sane of our hands for peanuts
sane value was starting at £100million but the lad spat his dummy out and got the move on the cheap
 
blueparrot said:
How could anyone answer before he plays for us. The club must expect he he will be, and that’s enough for me for now but it can’t really be answered maybe even for a couple of seasons.
Click to expand...

even the question of £100milion for a player that not played european football or top level football week in week out is crazy ? you know what B.silva is better than jack grealish so maybe we just say no
 
ancoats said:
even the question of £100milion for a player that not played european football or top level football week in week out is crazy ? you know what B.silva is better than jack grealish so maybe we just say no
Click to expand...
Don’ think Bernardo has been better than Grealish the last two years, anyway looks like Bernardo is going so Grealish will replace him, and would be an excellent replacement personally the cost has no relevance to me.
 
Cellarite said:
Are you seriously suggesting we don’t buy players from the top half of the Premier League anymore or are you going to be honest and say that this bullshit reason is just because you don’t want Grealish?
Click to expand...

maybe if a player wants to move to manchester city then let him push the move and spit his dummy out
just like sane did at city. no football club wants a unhappy player on there books ? funny enough they would sell pretty quick knowing the wages he is picking up doing nothing
 
blueparrot said:
Don’ think Bernardo has been better than Grealish the last two years, anyway looks like Bernardo is going so Grealish will replace him, and would be an excellent replacement personally the cost has no relevance to me.
Click to expand...

Bernardo is twice the player of Grealish
he would properly do a better job in the next 5 seasons given the chance in the city team
is see trouble with Grealish he is a nightlife eagle loves the limelight and put him in this city team it will double
 
banbury_blue said:
And what if we have? We obviously want the players, Pep has gone on about him previously about how good he is, Villa have a right to put a level under which they won’t sell… if it’s £100 million to secure him then fair play to Villa for standing firm, fair play to City for stumping up the money.

It’s amazing on here, previous times we’ve won the league, not advanced the squad and been accused of tight because we wont match other teams spending and you’d think the world had ended, next we’re being linked to class, and more importantly, proven players and people are going batshit crazy because they will cost a sack load of money… it’s almost like people don’t want the club to do either unless they have the absolute approval of someone that’s once won a couple of leagues on champ manager in the late 90’s
Click to expand...

if it was for a player already done it won titles/cups played champions league football then yes
BUT Grealish is not the finish article and will need time and dare i say pressure of the price tag

its a gamble and not what manchester city normally do in paying over the odds for a untested player
£100 million is a heavy stone to carry on a young man shoulders
 
ancoats said:
if it was for a player already done it won titles/cups played champions league football then yes
BUT Grealish is not the finish article and will need time and dare i say pressure of the price tag

its a gamble and not what manchester city normally do in paying over the odds for a untested player
£100 million is a heavy stone to carry on a young man shoulders
Click to expand...

The club must believe that he is capable of handling the pressure .
 
ancoats said:
if it was for a player already done it won titles/cups played champions league football then yes
BUT Grealish is not the finish article and will need time and dare i say pressure of the price tag

its a gamble and not what manchester city normally do in paying over the odds for a untested player
£100 million is a heavy stone to carry on a young man shoulders
Click to expand...
Bullshit. We paid big fees for Ederson, Walker, De Bruyne, Agüero, Dias…

All who, by your logic, were untested.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top