Because we’re prepared to pay it when push comes to shove?If he is hanging in for top money, why haven't we walked?
Is that French for Leroy?Llrois
to achieve 160 Million id say 130M pluss add ons, a crazy price tag but it can be window dressed in our favor, the extra 30M is generated on Kanes goals so to pay those add ons we would certainly be champions again and probably go on and win the CLAt £160m it's the clearest indication that it's 'buying' the next trophy!
What condition was gum in? Partially worn, edges knocked off, discoloured, knackered looking or still shiny white? Just saying may have been material factor.I just went to asda in alty after a meeting. There was a rather tasty looking cheese, onion and mayo sandwich for about £1.50. I took it to the counter and offered a quid, though with a couple of pieces of gum i had in my pocket as part of the deal. We negotiated for a while, though I ended up with a hoisin duck wrap and a packet of hoola hoops....
It’s not as if he’s handed in a transfer request or taken a dump on Levy’s desk.Not really. Messi had the same so called agreement he could leave but that all went bollocks up. Kane told us he could leave, 100m would do it but it's heading in the same direction. We owe kane absolutely nothing
Would make sense this. Struggling to believe Ornstein’s guesses as City would surely know Levy would laugh that off the table.to achieve 160 Million id say 130M pluss add ons, a crazy price tag but it can be window dressed in our favor, the extra 30M is generated on Kanes goals so to pay those add ons we would certainly be champions again and probably go on and win the CL
I think the extra £30m over the £100 is excessive. If Levy doesn't accept what were offering, whatever that is, hopefully a lot nearer £!00m than £200m, I'd walk away. But then I'm not managing the PL champions who wish to retain their crown but, more importantly, they want to walk off with the CL trophy! And yer'll do neither with no striker.to achieve 160 Million id say 130M pluss add ons, a crazy price tag but it can be window dressed in our favor, the extra 30M is generated on Kanes goals so to pay those add ons we would certainly be champions again and probably go on and win the CL
Llrois
But next year we will need a striker a DM and a LB.I’m completely relaxed about this. If we get him great if we don’t I’m not gonna spit my dummy out. I don’t mind if we go a season without winning everything and if it makes more financial sense to wait a year to get our next striker then so be it. Not like we’re gonna be fighting relegation not getting him.
Was the bill right?I just went to asda in alty after a meeting. There was a rather tasty looking cheese, onion and mayo sandwich for about £1.50. I took it to the counter and offered a quid, though with a couple of pieces of gum i had in my pocket as part of the deal. We negotiated for a while, though I ended up with a hoisin duck wrap and a packet of hoola hoops....
I genuinely think he has a point. Infact, I suggested this on Sunday on the way home from Spurs after our weaknesses and lack of a focal point were exposed. These clubs are in cohorts and will do anything they can to make us weaker.
Look at Villa offering Grealish to United and Madrid because they didn't want to do business with us.
It's one claim on this transfer forum that actually holds some water if you think about it!
Don’t think any top manager would think like that , great teams strengthen when they are on top and not when they have fallen behind .I’m completely relaxed about this. If we get him great if we don’t I’m not gonna spit my dummy out. I don’t mind if we go a season without winning everything and if it makes more financial sense to wait a year to get our next striker then so be it. Not like we’re gonna be fighting relegation not getting him.
Duck offWas the bill right?
Dangerous approach for us, if they sign one forward and then say they are keeping Harry to play with that new strikerSeems pretty simple to me this.
I consider the fee is agreed.
Spurs need to get their signings, with particular emphasis on Kane's replacement, in before they can / will allow Kane to go.
There is no way Spurs would want the clubs they are buying from to know they have "the Kane money" burning a big hole in their pockets.
Therefore, most of this signing being finalised will depend on whether Spurs can navigate their own situation.
Wouldn't call you extreme, Rammy. You're practically a club stooge compared to some we get on here.Like me for example.
How is it pedantic?Lloris. Kane is Spurs Vice Captain so it's a bit of a pedantic point anyway.
Because he's still a big part of the leadership group for both club and country.How is it pedantic?
Is this true? If so, I’d imagine it’ll be deadline day before it’s agreed, giving no time to spend the cash they receive on players & instead give it directly to HMRCThink Levy is worried about the 96m he has to pay HMRC by the end of September..
No, fowl play was at hand!!Was the bill right?