Cristiano Ronaldo

Status
Not open for further replies.
Of united players, Ronaldo isnt high up on my list of undesirables. That is easily headed by Neville, Scholes, Keane and that scumbag Giggs. We had Schmeichel, Kanchelskis, Cole, all play for us. Tevez was the best tho as he clearly wound up Fergusson.

Ronaldo is arrogant no doubt, but i cant recall him ever having a pop at City. If you wanted and were willing to accept Messi at City then there is little difference to accepting Ronaldo. He would do a job for 1 to 2 years, then we could go all out for Harland.
 
I am quite acquainted with Portguese media. Interesting to see if there is anything in the local outlets in a few hours.

I will usually ignore CMD or O Jogo but if Record does post something, I think this might be a legit story.

I am still treating this as a pressure tactic for Kane.
 
Octavian said:
Ones just said in a group chat I’m in, that he’ll genuinely cry real tears if it happens.

It’ll crush them.

Do it City.
Click to expand...
I think Rags have some kind of mythical attachment to Ronaldo but he probably has almost forgotten he played for them
 
LevyBee76 said:
He knows where the back of the net is thats the main thing, maybe he turns up fully knowing that he's only going to be playing a reduced role and spends time showing others how to hit the back of the net with ease
Click to expand...
Exactly this, if he can come in and contribute on the pitch but maybe pass on advice and his knowledge to the likes of Delap and even the current players like Sterling and Jesus then it’s a steal at £25m for me. I hate the bloke but nobody can deny he’s talented and professional, some see a moody player, I see a focused determine player who just wants perfection in his game and in others he plays with.
 
Wonder if this was what was irking Neville on Monday Night Football and why he seemed suddenly so desperate that Utd needed to go for Kane before the end of the window.
 
Age isn’t an issue for me here, whereas it is for Kane. We’d be paying a much lower fee and signing him for one or (maybe) two seasons. You know exactly what you’re getting with him. He might not be young, but he is extremely physically fit and I think he has got a few years left in him yet. He is still pretty damn quick. He’s a lethal goal scorer. A brilliant header of the ball. Can take free kicks. Can take penalties. He does absolutely everything we need. Only question for me is the wages he’d demand and what kind of fee we’d need to pay. But it makes sense on so many levels, especially with Bernardo wanting out.
 
Homar said:
Age isn’t an issue for me here, whereas it is for Kane. We’d be paying a much lower fee and signing him for one or (maybe) two seasons. You know exactly what you’re getting with him. He might not be young, but he is extremely physically fit and I think he has got a few years left in him yet. He is still pretty damn quick. He’s a lethal goal scorer. A brilliant header of the ball. Can take free kicks. Can take penalties. He does absolutely everything we need. Only question for me is the wages he’d demand and what kind of fee we’d need to pay. But it makes sense on so many levels, especially with Bernardo wanting out.
Click to expand...
L'Equipe says that City are willing to match his €31m a year salary but want to get him on free transfer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top