Cristiano Ronaldo

[MeatnSpudsMCFC]

Fuck me, just heard the news about Kane.

I've changed my vote above to yes.....

You can change it to no now.

Ah well. Carabao it is this year then.

 

[MadchesterCity]

Why not go the whole hog and fuck defending off all together?

Ederson
Walker
Bernardo KDB Grealish Foden Sterling
Mahrez Jesus Ferran
Ronaldo​

Plenty defensive players in the team I posted. Jesus, Sterling, De Bruyne, Foden all press hard. I'd of added Bernardo over jack, but felt bad leaving out 100M signing ;)

 

[Marvin]

Expect a avalanche of Ronaldo to City is unlikely now that Jack Gaughan has given his opinion. I think Gaughan's comments are uninformed because he doesn't identify any source.

The intriguing aspect is did Kane's camp go cold because they got wind that City were looking at Ronaldo and so they decided to salvage his status with Spurs fans?

 

[Cityinmud]

You can change it to no now.

Ah well. Carabao it is this year then.

I doubt we will win it this year. Haha.

 

[Postman Pep]

Rival fans keep saying he won the 2 champions league trophies because he had Messi and it has got to his head. Anyway, thats my theory and that's the reason he would rather complete the season without a striker rather that sign the 5 times champions league winner Ronaldo in my opinion.

Sounds more like rival fans have got to your head and you're overthinking things.

 

[colesy]

You can change it to no now.

Ah well. Carabao it is this year then.

So more than the rags will win then.

 

[MeatHunterrr]

You can change it to no now.

Ah well. Carabao it is this year then.

I wouldnt say it has improved if we lose Bernardo

 

[Octavian]

Fuck me, just heard the news about Kane.

I've changed my vote above to yes.....

Welcome to the dark side

 

[MadchesterCity]

94 Torres on the wing
94 Ederson as well lol

Please post the formation

 

[Bazzmand Show]

This won’t happen, but the general public will still accuse City of spending over the odds on Kane and Cristiano Ronaldo, along with Kaka, Pogba, Jorginho and so on. None of these happened, but the lies prevail.
The press talk loud about City spending, and those who don’t actually follow football get the impression that City buy everyone the media say they are interested in.

City might have spent a lot on Grealish, but they have received a lot in sales too, and if you look at net spend, they can probably afford a late bid for a decent goal-poacher, but my guess is that Pep will trust his current squad and wait.

The discussions on our expenditure are grossly exaggerated, but to suggest we haven't spent much under pep is also not accurate.

He's bought a lot.

 

[kun]

I wouldnt say it has improved if we lose Bernardo

I would say we have marginally improved or stayed still if Bernardo goes. If he stays I think we have improved.

 

[Lavinda Past]

You think we even have a chance at Haaland? We had no competition for Kane and couldn't get it done. Every top club will be after Haaland.

Correct.
Haaland, in my opinion, will most likely end up at the swamp next summer, if not in the January window. He's absolutely tailor made for the rags and they'll throw a lot more money at him and his agent/dad than we will.

In the meantime, the danger is that if Mbappe goes to Madrid, the door opens up for Ronaldo at PSG and we're left with a choice of an untested EDS lad, or spend £70m on some lad none of us had even considered as an outsider a few weeks ago, who would be a far bigger gamble than Danny Ings at a third of the fee.

Could we be ready to witness the mother of all fuck ups by City? I've got a terrible feeling that we may well be...

Just get Ronaldo signed up City, he's a 30 goal a season player.

 

[samuelyeboah]

I’m astonished there’s so many City fans that have voted ‘yes’. He’s a ****, has always been a **** and will forever be a ****. That said, if he scored the winner in St Petersburg next May, he’d then be our ****.

you don't sound that astonished then

 

[samuelyeboah]

if we replace aguero and bernardo with ronaldo and grealish then we've absolutely improved by a lot, imo

 

[Pam]

Correct.
Haaland, in my opinion, will most likely end up at the swamp next summer, if not in the January window. He's absolutely tailor made for the rags and they'll throw a lot more money at him and his agent/dad than we will.

In the meantime, the danger is that if Mbappe goes to Madrid, the door opens up for Ronaldo at PSG and we're left with a choice of an untested EDS lad, or spend £70m on some lad none of us had even considered as an outsider a few weeks ago, who would be a far bigger gamble than Danny Ings at a third of the fee.

Could we be ready to witness the mother of all fuck ups by City? I've got a terrible feeling that we may well be...

Just get Ronaldo signed up City, he's a 30 goal a season player.

Haaland is going to Real Madrid.

 

[hateutd]

Great player even in this age, but I think we will play with Torres as center forward... unfortunately

 

[better dead than red]

So disappointed if we don't sign a striker, after being promised one by Khaldoon. It's a blatant error if we don't.

Especially as our only recognised striker now says he wants to play on the wing!

Come on blues, perhaps we can start our own 'Pound for Ronaldo' campaign like united did years ago?

I like your name because it looks like kangaroo10

 

[leo_city]

if we replace aguero and bernardo with ronaldo and grealish then we've absolutely improved by a lot, imo

This late in the window you still think we'd bring in Ronaldo?

 

[MeatHunterrr]

if we replace aguero and bernardo with ronaldo and grealish then we've absolutely improved by a lot, imo

Thats up for debate. Current Ronaldo is miles better than Aguero right now but Grealish has lot to prove. Bernardo has been key part of the machine for years now and was our best player in the most successful season in City history. (2018/19)

 

[Sam1980]

Correct.
Haaland, in my opinion, will most likely end up at the swamp next summer, if not in the January window. He's absolutely tailor made for the rags and they'll throw a lot more money at him and his agent/dad than we will.

In the meantime, the danger is that if Mbappe goes to Madrid, the door opens up for Ronaldo at PSG and we're left with a choice of an untested EDS lad, or spend £70m on some lad none of us had even considered as an outsider a few weeks ago, who would be a far bigger gamble than Danny Ings at a third of the fee.

Could we be ready to witness the mother of all fuck ups by City? I've got a terrible feeling that we may well be...

Just get Ronaldo signed up City, he's a 30 goal a season player.

I want Ronaldo but won’t we be back to square 1 in two years