It's Quiet Thread 15 - Txiki Blinders

Status
Not open for further replies.
This has not been a successful transfer window by any means. Khaldoon did envisage a window in which we signed a world class striker and this has not happened. Grealish has joined and this has met with the approval of all at the club and fans alike but he is not a world class striker. They are, in fact, few in number and the only one to move this summer was Lukaku, who did not interest us and whom we did not interest. That he went to Chelsea seems to have angered some City fans more than that he would not come here. Chelsea are viewed as a club who get things done whereas we are a club that doesn't! Chelsea fans take a different view but this does nothing to calm those who can only believe that City's failure to bring every player the club targets to the Etihad is the incompetence of those who conduct the club's business. This is, of course, grossly unfair and based on nothing other than frustration and prejudice.

It appears that City identified Haaland and Kane as the only two who could fill the void left by Sergio. It is clear that Sergio was not released because the club had already agreed a deal for one of these but because his fitness meant he was unlikely to be available for as many games as we wanted. He has signed for Barcelona and even though he has not kicked a ball for them and even though he had a more rigorous medical than is usual he will have been at Barcelona 3 months at the least before he can make his debut. Sad as it was, Sergio had to be replaced and it was not a foolish decision to release him before a successor was bought.

It was soon fairly clear that Haaland was going nowhere. Dortmund wouldn't sell and those aound him seemed determined to make a fortune out of it if he did move. Chelsea, the club to get things done, lost interest and looked elsewher. City "concentrated" on Kane but it does seem that Levy never had any intention of selling and the "negotiations" drifted on rather aimlessly. The charge that Txiki should have "moved on" is unreasonable because he is entitled to as whom he should have moved on to, since we didn't want Lukaku and he didn't want us. This is where assertions that Pep is very happy with the squad he has are likely to be true. If Haaland and Kane are the onlt two preferred to Jesus and Torres it sounds as though Pep is very pleased indeed with his squad and our squad is far and a way the best in the PL and probably Europe. There is no point in buying a striker who is worse than we already have.

This raises the question of Ronaldo. Many were convinced that this was panic buying because we had been "knocked back" by Kane. City do not buy anyone in panic. It would have been opportunistic had we bought him because he had not been a target at any time. The dealings with club and player never went far enough to result in a concrete offer, certainly not to Juventus and the idea that we did not get him simply because Txiki refused to cough up 25 million euros convinces only those who are determined to believe that our club doesn't actually know what it's doing, despite the evidence that when we pass on a player it is very soon shown to have been the right decision. I would like to have heard the discussions we had about Ronaldo.
Sensible, level headed take on things
 
So we missed out on Messi because we were focused on Kane but actually made no attempt to sign Kane? What the fuck were they doing all summer genuinely
Neither statement true, Messi to PSG was wrapped up way before he couldn’t sign for Barca. We tried Kane,Spurs refused to negotiate.
 
This is correct. But I think it's fair to suggest that strategy wise it's been a mess. They needed a LB, that was before the Mendy Court case. They needed a striker. They haven't delivered.

We have enough quality in our squad to win the title. But our rivals have strengthened. It will be very difficult, the club needed to give Pep a #9.

Need is a funny old word.

People were absolutely adamant we needed a LB last summer, and we really needed a defensive midfielder, and quite a few people thought we needed a striker.

Turns out we didn't, did we? Walked the league, won a cup, best year ever in the CL.
 
View attachment 25189

You know absolutely zero about city.
Pretty mature reply that. We went after a player who wasn't going to be sold at all (as confirmed by Pep). Do we need a striker? Yes. Can we do without one? Yes, but it's making Peps job tougher isn't it? Weren't we supposed to replace Aguero? I am not going on a rant against the management, but no harm in accepting that our striker pursuit wasn't ideal at all.
 
Neither statement true, Messi to PSG was wrapped up way before he couldn’t sign for Barca. We tried Kane,Spurs refused to negotiate.
We had no chance at Messi because they were too prideful to go back in for him. Wasted all summer around Kane and they refused to negotiate. We only signed Grealish because he’s on a release clause. We’re fucking useless
 
Need is a funny old word.

People were absolutely adamant we needed a LB last summer, and we really needed a defensive midfielder, and quite a few people thought we needed a striker.

Turns out we didn't, did we? Walked the league, won a cup, best year ever in the CL.
A striker is clearly far important though. Teams have improved we haven’t. Don’t seem to learn
 
I think what this window has taught me is, when the season finishes go away take a breather. Come back when season begins and disregard everything until window closes.

The highs and lows all the blues went through in last 3 days. Man…..

I need a breather see you in the post Arsenal thread.
 
Need is a funny old word.

People were absolutely adamant we needed a LB last summer, and we really needed a defensive midfielder, and quite a few people thought we needed a striker.

Turns out we didn't, did we? Walked the league, won a cup, best year ever in the CL.

expect the left back we used was exposed for the goal in a champions league final and the DM we bought was left on the bench whilst the one we wanted went on to boss the game and win it for Chelsea.

I’m zinchenko’s biggest fan but you can’t make the statement you just did considering how our biggest ever game played out at lb and DM.
 
Need is a funny old word.

People were absolutely adamant we needed a LB last summer, and we really needed a defensive midfielder, and quite a few people thought we needed a striker.

Turns out we didn't, did we? Walked the league, won a cup, best year ever in the CL.
Maybe we would have won the CL with one.
I think it's pretty difficult to take a disspassionate look at CIty and not say we would be improved with a decent striker though we will probably still make top 4 without.
 
Usual media feeding frenzy over nowt then ?
What pisses me off has been the media narrative. They made is sound like it was almost a done deal. ( I know you shouldn't believe everything you read written by these cretinous journos )
Thanks to their reporting it know makes it look like the scum have snatched him from under our noses, and they are all gleefully grinning about them getting one over us again. Utter pile of shite from the media once again. Hate every last one of the fuckers with every fibre of my being.
 
i think what everyone should learn from this is to ignore the countless twatteraty who know absolutely fuck all! How many of them said it was either a done deal, or really close when in reality we barely considered it by what is being said now...He was offered to us and weve said no......
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top