United Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
It could just be that Bielsa sees what we all see. When a player leaves the swamp they improve overnight, and as a proper coach believes he can improve him.

Saying that, 30m is still wayyy to much
Bielsa was on the verge of buying Jesse, when the rags gazzumped them and ended up paying a lot more than the Yorkshire twats had agreed.
 
You can tell Ferguson is running things as now back to selling dead wood for more than double what they are worth
 
Rag PF machine in full spin.

Abdolute fucking jokers.

Yep
Highest paid PL player in history and reports of 510k a week. Remember they paid the Piano Man 400-500k a week . None of the arse licking scum media will report it though, same as Dippers contract renewals, zero mention of wages.

The BBC story "How Rags pulled off shock move for Ronaldo" could simply be "Juventus wanted rid, City offered him as we were his 1st choice and we said no and no one else wanted him so only Rags left stupid enough to pay over 500k a week to him"
 
He loves their club so much he has such fond memories of being made to feel like a slave and desperately wanting out of the place because he detested it.
Welcome home Ronny!
Does anyone remember when he was asked, a few years ago, who he thought would win the derby?

His answer - "Manchester"!
 
Jeeeeeez just looked on the BBC website ..... HOW MAN U PULLED OFF THE SHOCK RONALDO TRANSFER ......... I tell you how nobody was willing to fork out them wages on a player whose gonna only get slower over the next few years ....... jeeeeez I really hope the twats fall on there faces ..... the thought of plastic rags gracing the streets of Bradford is enough to make a grown man cry
The fuckers are everywhere here, aren’t they, Gaz?
 
Yep
Highest paid PL player in history and reports of 510k a week. Remember they paid the Piano Man 400-500k a week . None of the arse licking scum media will report it though, same as Dippers contract renewals, zero mention of wages.

The BBC story "How Rags pulled off shock move for Ronaldo" could simply be "Juventus wanted rid, City offered him as we were his 1st choice and we said no and no one else wanted him so only Rags left stupid enough to pay over 500k a week to him"

Interesting snip-it from Bloomberg today, where many people have stated the Ronaldo deal will pay for itself in commercial revenue for the rags.

Its probably what Juventus thought too when they initially invested 100million euros at the time to acquire his services.

Apart from the obvious 82 million euros difference with his 18million sale, Juventus also reported the overall transaction/deal generated a negative economic impact on the club of around 16.6million euros during the 20-21 fiscal year.
 
I went to Tesco yesterday evening, wearing a City T-shirt.

Just after I’d entered the store, a bloke, probably in his late 20s, came up to me and asked, "Are you a Man. City fan?" When I confirmed that I am, he got really excited, and said, putting his thumb and forefinger together, "You were this close to getting Ronaldo!"

I replied, "No, we weren’t. We were never interested in him."

"Oh well, the media said you were."

Obviously a fake fan-boy.
 
The media circus is already working up the excitement to fever pitch about Sept 11th when they expect CR to appear before the adoring masses.

It will dwarf the interest in any other match this season.

All carefully orchestrated - and vomit-inducing
 
The media circus is already working up the excitement to fever pitch about Sept 11th when they expect CR to appear before the adoring masses.

It will dwarf the interest in any other match this season.

All carefully orchestrated - and vomit-inducing

BBC Sport football page is wall to wall balls deep on his signing, his history and his legacy.

Meanwhile Goldbridge doing his nut - now its Chelsea ruining football because as we know the rags have only made a couple of loan signings this window............

 
The rags must have many many friends within the media in this country. I honestly cannot remember the last time I read a negative article about them anywhere, in fact I’m not sure one even exists.
No matter what they do, how much they spend, how often they cheat, the media WILL put a positive spin on it. When that buck-toothed wanker goes down in the area without anybody touching him, the press simply say ‘he went down perhaps a little too easily’. Any other club (apart from the dippers, maybe) and they’d say ‘It was a deliberate attempt to con the referee’.

The tabloids are the worst, far and away the worst: but a number of the broadsheets are also somewhat reluctant to criticise the club for anything.

There has to be some kind of deal going on because no club should be seen as above criticism. But they seem to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat
The media circus is already working up the excitement to fever pitch about Sept 11th when they expect CR to appear before the adoring masses.

It will dwarf the interest in any other match this season.
And anything else that happened previously on September 11th
 
The rags must have many many friends within the media in this country. I honestly cannot remember the last time I read a negative article about them anywhere, in fact I’m not sure one even exists.
No matter what they do, how much they spend, how often they cheat, the media WILL put a positive spin on it. When that buck-toothed wanker goes down in the area without anybody touching him, the press simply say ‘he went down perhaps a little too easily’. Any other club (apart from the dippers, maybe) and they’d say ‘It was a deliberate attempt to con the referee’.

The tabloids are the worst, far and away the worst: but a number of the broadsheets are also somewhat reluctant to criticise the club for anything.

There has to be some kind of deal going on because no club should be seen as above criticism. But they seem to be.
I'll give you a clue...

GPC still has his claws in at the BBC, and most of the rats who work at Media City are Rag's.
 
The rags must have many many friends within the media in this country. I honestly cannot remember the last time I read a negative article about them anywhere, in fact I’m not sure one even exists.
No matter what they do, how much they spend, how often they cheat, the media WILL put a positive spin on it. When that buck-toothed wanker goes down in the area without anybody touching him, the press simply say ‘he went down perhaps a little too easily’. Any other club (apart from the dippers, maybe) and they’d say ‘It was a deliberate attempt to con the referee’.

The tabloids are the worst, far and away the worst: but a number of the broadsheets are also somewhat reluctant to criticise the club for anything.

There has to be some kind of deal going on because no club should be seen as above criticism. But they seem to be.
City were told it’s United’s turn to win the premier. No point spending money this summer.

Masters has his orders.
 
The Glazers probably made a quick killing before the share price started to drop. It’s always advantages to have inside information.

1630433287777.jpeg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top