You got me there
A bit aggressive and not entirely true, or at allDude, FO.
When you can't offer up a decent response to a post that calls you out, you're full of shit. That's the difference between me and the rest of you bullshitters.
I WILL until you get to this circular crap of straw man joining in with the feral cabal on here.
You set a situation and I pull out a similar one that was ignored to suit your narrative.
I'm bored of it and everyone who gets to that point.
Give it a rest.Dude, FO.
When you can't offer up a decent response to a post that calls you out, you're full of shit. That's the difference between me and the rest of you bullshitters.
I WILL until you get to this circular crap of straw man joining in with the feral cabal on here.
You set a situation and I pull out a similar one that was ignored to suit your narrative.
I'm bored of it and everyone who gets to that point.
A bit aggressive and not entirely true, or at all
Give it a rest.
You'll end up giving yourself an ulcer...
I don't see that your narrative is at all in conflict with mine. Russia wanted Trump to win.That isnt what happened though I appreciate the sentiment. Russia didn't pick a candidate between the two. Trump toyed with running for president as far back as 1987 but it was probably a business promotion decision rather than serious. It got serious when Russian told him in 2014 that they would back him if he went for the 2016 election. They didnt choose between they actually made their own Manchurian. They made him
Puzzles me why anyone with even half a brain wants to relitigate 2017’s discussions when it’s been proven beyond doubt that the the Russian government actively assisted the Trump campaign. If Clinton had a crooked lawyer, it changes absolutely nothing about the established proven facts whatever any washed up ex celebrity junkie says on YouTube.I don't see that your narrative is at all in conflict with mine. Russia wanted Trump to win.
Yeah I’ve looked back at the discussion which started with you posting a clip of the cartoon polemicist Russell Brand which I started but didn’t finish watching but did my own research into the point he was covering and questioned his conclusions.Look back on the 'discussion'.
You have nuanced the "not entirely true" and straddled it with "or at all".
Even you know that's a bullshit compromise.
Anyway, whatever, man.
Yeah I’ve looked back at the discussion which started with you posting a clip of the cartoon polemicist Russell Brand which I started but didn’t finish watching but did my own research into the point he was covering and questioned his conclusions.
I asked a couple of questions, you saw your arse and we both behaved a bit twattishly with you insisting I’m part of your imaginary cabal. You threw around the insults and became aggressive, I continued to be a bit of a twat. That seems to be the way all my discussions with you go
He's a bit of a master at creating confrontation. I often question whether that's his aim all along. I try not to engage...Yeah I’ve looked back at the discussion which started with you posting a clip of the cartoon polemicist Russell Brand which I started but didn’t finish watching but did my own research into the point he was covering and questioned his conclusions.
I asked a couple of questions, you saw your arse and we both behaved a bit twattishly with you insisting I’m part of your imaginary cabal. You threw around the insults and became aggressive, I continued to be a bit of a twat. That seems to be the way all my discussions with you go
Read an article about Pep in the guardian today which made me think of…He's a bit of a master at creating confrontation. I often question whether that's his aim all along. I try not to engage...
Well would you look at that.
All the same though these parties and who follows them…Just think... in another 15 generations or so, idiocy will be virtually extinct!
Save that the idiots may kill us all meantime.
The fuck these cûnts playing at?
It's politics. Dems want the Republicans on record as blocking a vote to lift the debt ceiling. And got it.This will backfire if they push it all the way. Its the perfect excuse the Dems need to remove the filibuster. And if they do that it opens them up to do all the things that the GOP would love to block as they would be very popular with voters.