Religion

Rather than write reams and reams of shit, why don't you answer the simple questions put to you? I'll try again. Do you believe in evolution? How old do you think the earth is? Do you believe in the evil god of the old testament?
I can't answer every question put to me as I just haven't the time. But I've lready answered 2 of your questions in the thread if you read through my replies to posters.

As for the age of the earth I can give you around 100 evidences that would confirm the age of earth to be considerably less than billions of years evolution posits . I can’t prove the age of the earth using a particular scientific method. You've got to realize that all science is tentative because we do not have all the data, especially when dealing with the past. This is true of both creationist and evolutionist scientific views.
I began to exist? Or the universe? I began to exist when I was born. The universe is another matter...we just don't know if it began to exist. Or what came before it. Oh, yeah...theists make the rules here, I almost forgot....the special rule that everything has a beginning,,,but this god thing. I reject your special rule.
Stop telling me what I believe....i've made no claims. I stated that "I don't know"...but that doesn't mean GOD!
An atheist is somebody that doesn't believe in your god claim...they don't have to have ANY answers. It's up to the person making the claim to provide the answers and evidence.

So you don't believe the bible is immoral? A book that advises how to keep slaves. How you can OWN another human. A book that describes a god that hates and murders innocent children? A misogynistic and homophobic book.

Morality is society based...the bible's only morals are for the age that it was written. It's stuck in those times. Or do you still not eat shrimp? Morality is forever changing. And people that identify as atheist tend to have better morals than most Christians. Morals aren't from any god...we KNOW the Bible can not be any god's word anyway. Morals are for a better society all round.
Any person that has to get their morals from a book, is clearly not good. To do good just because you believe a god is watching you is clearly for selfish reasons. For the fear of what will happen when you die. People that do good deeds without a belief in a god are the real good people.
It’s often useful to ask a questioner to justify the validity of his question under his own belief system. For an atheist to complain that the Christian God is ‘evil,’ he must provide a standard of good and evil by which to judge Him. But if we are simply evolved pond scum, as a consistent atheist must believe, where can we find an objective standard of right and wrong?

Our ideas of right and wrong, under this system, are merely outcomes of some chemical processes that occur in the brain, which happened to confer survival advantage on our alleged ape-like ancestors. But the notions in Hitler’s brain obeyed the same chemical laws as those in Mother Teresa’s, so on what grounds are the latter’s actions ‘better’ than the former’s? Also, why should a terrorist attack slaying thousands of people in New York be more terrible than a frog eating thousands of flies? Human life isn't very special on atheism.Most atheists are pro choice killing pre borns in the womb. Are you? It is easy to see why. It is impossible to get to objective morality on atheism. That would mean there would have to be an objective moral law giver . An Ultimate.
The atheist dare not posit an Ultimate Guarantor of objective morals.

A Christian, however, believes there is an objective standard of morality that rises above individual humans, because it is set by an objective and transcendent moral Lawgiver who is our Creator. An atheist’s argument against God because of objective evil inadvertently concedes the very point he is trying to argue against!

Belief in evolution and/or millions of years of history necessitates that death has been a part of history since life first appeared on this planet. If you believe that the fossil layers (containing billions of dead things) represent the history of life over millions of years, it’s a very ugly record—full of death, disease and suffering.
Christians who believe in millions of years of history have a serious problem. The Bible plainly says that God is the Creator, and He called everything that He had made—before, leading up to, and including Adam and Eve, but before their Fall—‘very good’ (Genesis 1:31).
As soon as Christians allow for death, suffering and disease before Adam’s sin (which they automatically must if they believe in millions of years), then they’ve raised a serious question about their Gospel message. What, then, has sin done to the world? According to Christian teaching, death is the penalty for sin (Romans 6:23)—and this fact is the foundation of the Gospel! Moreover, how can all things be ‘restored’ to a state with no death, pain or tears in the future (Revelation 21:4) if there never was a time free of death and suffering? The whole message of the Gospel falls apart if you have this view of history. It also would mean that God is to blame for death.
Fortunately, God has given us a different account of the history of death, recorded in His Word—the TaNaK ( Torah,Nabiim Ketuvim- law Prophets ,Writings - Old Testament ) and New Testament added together to give us the Christian Bible. This historical document connects to real issues of life, and it fully explains why horrible things happen. In fact, God’s Word has much to say about death.

‘Sin and death.’
This phrase sums up the true history of death, as recorded in Genesis, the first book of the Bible. God originally created a perfect world, described by God as ‘very good’ (Genesis 1:31). People and animals ate plants, not other animals (Genesis 1:29–30). There was no violence or pain in this ‘very good’ world
But this sinless world was marred by the rebellion of the first man, Adam. His sin brought an intruder into the world—death. God had told him if he disobeyed and ate from a certain tree that death would result. He succumbed to temptation and ate and it affected all.
The Bible makes it clear that death is the penalty for our sin, not just the sin of Adam. If you accept the Bible’s account of history, then our sins—not just the sins of ‘the other guy’—are responsible for all the death and suffering in the world! In other words, it is really our fault that the world is the way it is. No-one is really ‘innocent.’

Jesus said something that is directly applicable to modern tragedies, such as the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in the United States on September 11, 2001. Luke 13:4 records His words: ‘Those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them—do you think they were sinners above all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no!’ Suffering in our lives is not always related to our personal sins , however,Jesus went on to say that ‘unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.’ Though this may have been referring to perishing physically in the coming downfall of Jerusalem, the bottom line is that no-one is innocent. All of us are sinners and therefore condemned to die. The question is will we all
turn to God?
 
Last edited:
I'm sympathetic to those beleaguered people that have the view that there is a God, what fucking morons eh? (I'm not really cos I don't know what I'm talking about) but I'm also sympathetic to Atheists, cos they might have egg on their face as well.

Never read any texts, sacred ones, and I have no faith, so God, to me is 'hope' so when I think I'm dying I pray to hope that I don't, it's worked so far
 
I can't answer every question put to me as I just haven't the time. But I've lready answered 2 of your questions in the thread if you read through my replies to posters.

As for the age of the earth I can give you around 100 evidences that would confirm the age of earth to be considerably less than billions of years evolution posits . I can’t prove the age of the earth using a particular scientific method. You've got to realize that all science is tentative because we do not have all the data, especially when dealing with the past. This is true of both creationist and evolutionist scientific views.
It’s often useful to ask a questioner to justify the validity of his question under his own belief system. For an atheist to complain that the Christian God is ‘evil,’ he must provide a standard of good and evil by which to judge Him. But if we are simply evolved pond scum, as a consistent atheist must believe, where can we find an objective standard of right and wrong?

Our ideas of right and wrong, under this system, are merely outcomes of some chemical processes that occur in the brain, which happened to confer survival advantage on our alleged ape-like ancestors. But the notions in Hitler’s brain obeyed the same chemical laws as those in Mother Teresa’s, so on what grounds are the latter’s actions ‘better’ than the former’s? Also, why should a terrorist attack slaying thousands of people in New York be more terrible than a frog eating thousands of flies? Human life isn't very special on atheism.Most atheists are pro choice killing pre borns in the womb. Are you? It is easy to see why. It is impossible to get to objective morality on atheism. That would mean there would have to be an objective moral law giver . An Ultimate.
The atheist dare not posit an Ultimate Guarantor of objective morals.

A Christian, however, believes there is an objective standard of morality that rises above individual humans, because it is set by an objective and transcendent moral Lawgiver who is our Creator. An atheist’s argument against God because of objective evil inadvertently concedes the very point he is trying to argue against!

Belief in evolution and/or millions of years of history necessitates that death has been a part of history since life first appeared on this planet. If you believe that the fossil layers (containing billions of dead things) represent the history of life over millions of years, it’s a very ugly record—full of death, disease and suffering.
Christians who believe in millions of years of history have a serious problem. The Bible plainly says that God is the Creator, and He called everything that He had made—before, leading up to, and including Adam and Eve, but before their Fall—‘very good’ (Genesis 1:31).
As soon as Christians allow for death, suffering and disease before Adam’s sin (which they automatically must if they believe in millions of years), then they’ve raised a serious question about their Gospel message. What, then, has sin done to the world? According to Christian teaching, death is the penalty for sin (Romans 6:23)—and this fact is the foundation of the Gospel! Moreover, how can all things be ‘restored’ to a state with no death, pain or tears in the future (Revelation 21:4) if there never was a time free of death and suffering? The whole message of the Gospel falls apart if you have this view of history. It also would mean that God is to blame for death.
Fortunately, God has given us a different account of the history of death, recorded in His Word—the TaNaK ( Torah,Nabiim Ketuvim- law Prophets ,Writings - Old Testament ) and New Testament added together to give us the Christian Bible. This historical document connects to real issues of life, and it fully explains why horrible things happen. In fact, God’s Word has much to say about death.

‘Sin and death.’
This phrase sums up the true history of death, as recorded in Genesis, the first book of the Bible. God originally created a perfect world, described by God as ‘very good’ (Genesis 1:31). People and animals ate plants, not other animals (Genesis 1:29–30). There was no violence or pain in this ‘very good’ world
But this sinless world was marred by the rebellion of the first man, Adam. His sin brought an intruder into the world—death. God had told him if he disobeyed and ate from a certain tree that death would result. He succumbed to temptation and ate and it affected all.
The Bible makes it clear that death is the penalty for our sin, not just the sin of Adam. If you accept the Bible’s account of history, then our sins—not just the sins of ‘the other guy’—are responsible for all the death and suffering in the world! In other words, it is really our fault that the world is the way it is. No-one is really ‘innocent.’

Jesus said something that is directly applicable to modern tragedies, such as the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in the United States on September 11, 2001. Luke 13:4 records His words: ‘Those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them—do you think they were sinners above all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no!’ Suffering in our lives is not always related to our personal sins , however,Jesus went on to say that ‘unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.’ Though this may have been referring to perishing physically in the coming downfall of Jerusalem, the bottom line is that no-one is innocent. All of us are sinners and therefore condemned to die. The question is will we all
turn to God?
Total bunkum, please don't pass off pseudoscience nonsense as peer reviewed scientific papers.
You also mention death as being a punishment. But all Christians harp on about are the rewards of entering into the kingdom of heaven? Bit hypocritical.
 
Last edited:
Total bunkum, please don't pass off pseudoscience nonsense as peer reviewed scientific papers.
It's getting almost time to call the mods in for the amount of copypasta being done, with no questions being answered, just tranche 5.0 slapped in - and it's a very laughable 'haven't got the time to answer'. The (or rather my) questions are simple:
1. Are you married?
2. Do you eat shellfish?
3. Are all your individual clothes made from a single material?
4. Have you got a tattoo?
5. if you have a wife, do you restrain her from speaking until you give her permission each time?
 
I can't answer every question put to me as I just haven't the time. But I've lready answered 2 of your questions in the thread if you read through my replies to posters.

As for the age of the earth I can give you around 100 evidences that would confirm the age of earth to be considerably less than billions of years evolution posits . I can’t prove the age of the earth using a particular scientific method. You've got to realize that all science is tentative because we do not have all the data, especially when dealing with the past. This is true of both creationist and evolutionist scientific views.
It’s often useful to ask a questioner to justify the validity of his question under his own belief system. For an atheist to complain that the Christian God is ‘evil,’ he must provide a standard of good and evil by which to judge Him. But if we are simply evolved pond scum, as a consistent atheist must believe, where can we find an objective standard of right and wrong?

Our ideas of right and wrong, under this system, are merely outcomes of some chemical processes that occur in the brain, which happened to confer survival advantage on our alleged ape-like ancestors. But the notions in Hitler’s brain obeyed the same chemical laws as those in Mother Teresa’s, so on what grounds are the latter’s actions ‘better’ than the former’s? Also, why should a terrorist attack slaying thousands of people in New York be more terrible than a frog eating thousands of flies? Human life isn't very special on atheism.Most atheists are pro choice killing pre borns in the womb. Are you? It is easy to see why. It is impossible to get to objective morality on atheism. That would mean there would have to be an objective moral law giver . An Ultimate.
The atheist dare not posit an Ultimate Guarantor of objective morals.

A Christian, however, believes there is an objective standard of morality that rises above individual humans, because it is set by an objective and transcendent moral Lawgiver who is our Creator. An atheist’s argument against God because of objective evil inadvertently concedes the very point he is trying to argue against!

Belief in evolution and/or millions of years of history necessitates that death has been a part of history since life first appeared on this planet. If you believe that the fossil layers (containing billions of dead things) represent the history of life over millions of years, it’s a very ugly record—full of death, disease and suffering.
Christians who believe in millions of years of history have a serious problem. The Bible plainly says that God is the Creator, and He called everything that He had made—before, leading up to, and including Adam and Eve, but before their Fall—‘very good’ (Genesis 1:31).
As soon as Christians allow for death, suffering and disease before Adam’s sin (which they automatically must if they believe in millions of years), then they’ve raised a serious question about their Gospel message. What, then, has sin done to the world? According to Christian teaching, death is the penalty for sin (Romans 6:23)—and this fact is the foundation of the Gospel! Moreover, how can all things be ‘restored’ to a state with no death, pain or tears in the future (Revelation 21:4) if there never was a time free of death and suffering? The whole message of the Gospel falls apart if you have this view of history. It also would mean that God is to blame for death.
Fortunately, God has given us a different account of the history of death, recorded in His Word—the TaNaK ( Torah,Nabiim Ketuvim- law Prophets ,Writings - Old Testament ) and New Testament added together to give us the Christian Bible. This historical document connects to real issues of life, and it fully explains why horrible things happen. In fact, God’s Word has much to say about death.

‘Sin and death.’
This phrase sums up the true history of death, as recorded in Genesis, the first book of the Bible. God originally created a perfect world, described by God as ‘very good’ (Genesis 1:31). People and animals ate plants, not other animals (Genesis 1:29–30). There was no violence or pain in this ‘very good’ world
But this sinless world was marred by the rebellion of the first man, Adam. His sin brought an intruder into the world—death. God had told him if he disobeyed and ate from a certain tree that death would result. He succumbed to temptation and ate and it affected all.
The Bible makes it clear that death is the penalty for our sin, not just the sin of Adam. If you accept the Bible’s account of history, then our sins—not just the sins of ‘the other guy’—are responsible for all the death and suffering in the world! In other words, it is really our fault that the world is the way it is. No-one is really ‘innocent.’

Jesus said something that is directly applicable to modern tragedies, such as the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in the United States on September 11, 2001. Luke 13:4 records His words: ‘Those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them—do you think they were sinners above all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no!’ Suffering in our lives is not always related to our personal sins , however,Jesus went on to say that ‘unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.’ Though this may have been referring to perishing physically in the coming downfall of Jerusalem, the bottom line is that no-one is innocent. All of us are sinners and therefore condemned to die. The question is will we all
turn to God?
I've already said why morality is important without any god.
And quoting an already proven flawed book to prove a point is just a waste of time. We already KNOW that your religion is false.
Nobody can prove that a god DOESN'T exist...you can't prove a negative...but we can prove that the book you get all your information from, IS flawed. Christianity is easy to dismiss. If the first chapter of the book gets it so wrong, the rest can be ignored.
 
so you can answer personal (related) questions! How about answering the others posed to you?

eg I'll answer one of yours: 'The question is will we all turn to God?'
No.
I expected at least one person would say that that :-)

Well I'm trying to answer all of them but there's only one of me . So bear with me please.
You may find I've answered a lot of them in the last 12 pages replying to others posts.
 
I can't answer every question put to me as I just haven't the time. But I've lready answered 2 of your questions in the thread if you read through my replies to posters.

As for the age of the earth I can give you around 100 evidences that would confirm the age of earth to be considerably less than billions of years evolution posits . I can’t prove the age of the earth using a particular scientific method. You've got to realize that all science is tentative because we do not have all the data, especially when dealing with the past. This is true of both creationist and evolutionist scientific views.
It’s often useful to ask a questioner to justify the validity of his question under his own belief system. For an atheist to complain that the Christian God is ‘evil,’ he must provide a standard of good and evil by which to judge Him. But if we are simply evolved pond scum, as a consistent atheist must believe, where can we find an objective standard of right and wrong?

Our ideas of right and wrong, under this system, are merely outcomes of some chemical processes that occur in the brain, which happened to confer survival advantage on our alleged ape-like ancestors. But the notions in Hitler’s brain obeyed the same chemical laws as those in Mother Teresa’s, so on what grounds are the latter’s actions ‘better’ than the former’s? Also, why should a terrorist attack slaying thousands of people in New York be more terrible than a frog eating thousands of flies? Human life isn't very special on atheism.Most atheists are pro choice killing pre borns in the womb. Are you? It is easy to see why. It is impossible to get to objective morality on atheism. That would mean there would have to be an objective moral law giver . An Ultimate.
The atheist dare not posit an Ultimate Guarantor of objective morals.

A Christian, however, believes there is an objective standard of morality that rises above individual humans, because it is set by an objective and transcendent moral Lawgiver who is our Creator. An atheist’s argument against God because of objective evil inadvertently concedes the very point he is trying to argue against!

Belief in evolution and/or millions of years of history necessitates that death has been a part of history since life first appeared on this planet. If you believe that the fossil layers (containing billions of dead things) represent the history of life over millions of years, it’s a very ugly record—full of death, disease and suffering.
Christians who believe in millions of years of history have a serious problem. The Bible plainly says that God is the Creator, and He called everything that He had made—before, leading up to, and including Adam and Eve, but before their Fall—‘very good’ (Genesis 1:31).
As soon as Christians allow for death, suffering and disease before Adam’s sin (which they automatically must if they believe in millions of years), then they’ve raised a serious question about their Gospel message. What, then, has sin done to the world? According to Christian teaching, death is the penalty for sin (Romans 6:23)—and this fact is the foundation of the Gospel! Moreover, how can all things be ‘restored’ to a state with no death, pain or tears in the future (Revelation 21:4) if there never was a time free of death and suffering? The whole message of the Gospel falls apart if you have this view of history. It also would mean that God is to blame for death.
Fortunately, God has given us a different account of the history of death, recorded in His Word—the TaNaK ( Torah,Nabiim Ketuvim- law Prophets ,Writings - Old Testament ) and New Testament added together to give us the Christian Bible. This historical document connects to real issues of life, and it fully explains why horrible things happen. In fact, God’s Word has much to say about death.

‘Sin and death.’
This phrase sums up the true history of death, as recorded in Genesis, the first book of the Bible. God originally created a perfect world, described by God as ‘very good’ (Genesis 1:31). People and animals ate plants, not other animals (Genesis 1:29–30). There was no violence or pain in this ‘very good’ world
But this sinless world was marred by the rebellion of the first man, Adam. His sin brought an intruder into the world—death. God had told him if he disobeyed and ate from a certain tree that death would result. He succumbed to temptation and ate and it affected all.
The Bible makes it clear that death is the penalty for our sin, not just the sin of Adam. If you accept the Bible’s account of history, then our sins—not just the sins of ‘the other guy’—are responsible for all the death and suffering in the world! In other words, it is really our fault that the world is the way it is. No-one is really ‘innocent.’

Jesus said something that is directly applicable to modern tragedies, such as the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in the United States on September 11, 2001. Luke 13:4 records His words: ‘Those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them—do you think they were sinners above all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no!’ Suffering in our lives is not always related to our personal sins , however,Jesus went on to say that ‘unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.’ Though this may have been referring to perishing physically in the coming downfall of Jerusalem, the bottom line is that no-one is innocent. All of us are sinners and therefore condemned to die. The question is will we all
turn to God?
How old do you think the earth is?
 
I expected at least one person would say that that :-)

Well I'm trying to answer all of them but there's only one of me . So bear with me please.
You may find I've answered a lot of them in the last 12 pages replying to others posts.
Take it you don’t believe carbon dating from what you’ve posted, might as well be a flat earther. I’ll end it there.
 
Total bunkum, please don't pass off pseudoscience nonsense as peer reviewed scientific papers. YOU ASKED . ñ
You also mention death as being a punishment. But all Christians harp on about are the rewards of entering into the kingdom of heaven? Bit hypocritical.
The knowledge and personal belief that Christ ( Ha Maschiach) has taken the punishment on Himself , the blame for every sin,past present and future is what assures new life in the present and eternal life in heaven or paradise. . It is the simple good news message.
Death passed on to every man because of the one man Adam's transgression. Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned.
There would have been no death had Adam not ate of that tree of knowledge of good and evil. Although it took him a long time to die, the process had begun.
He was asked to eat from any tree exceot the one that would bring death. Could have ate from thousands upon thousands of other trees but because the evil one tempted them both with a lie" you won't really die" ,which is calling God a liar, they fell for it in their choice of self-interests rather than God's interest for them, the making of self the chief end and with Adam putting his own authority above God's.All of us are like that. We are no different than Adam in our selfishness and and listen to the tempter to varying degrees.
 
138 pages? Seriously?!

Religion is a man-made construct to make sentient beings feel better about there being nothing after death. Oh, and patriarchal control of the masses.

I’m going to go with a bit of Ricky Gervais logic…

There are about 4,000 religions on earth and each of them has their own belief system and their own deity. I believe in one less than all those religious people. They can’t all be right!

Oh, and don’t get me started on the human arrogance that “God” created the universe and Jesus was his son, born of a virgin birth!

YCMIU with a straight face, but someone did, and MEN WITH THE POWER IT BESTOWED ON THEM ran with it…and here we are!!!
 
I can't answer every question put to me as I just haven't the time. But I've lready answered 2 of your questions in the thread if you read through my replies to posters.

As for the age of the earth I can give you around 100 evidences that would confirm the age of earth to be considerably less than billions of years evolution posits . I can’t prove the age of the earth using a particular scientific method. You've got to realize that all science is tentative because we do not have all the data, especially when dealing with the past. This is true of both creationist and evolutionist scientific views.
It’s often useful to ask a questioner to justify the validity of his question under his own belief system. For an atheist to complain that the Christian God is ‘evil,’ he must provide a standard of good and evil by which to judge Him. But if we are simply evolved pond scum, as a consistent atheist must believe, where can we find an objective standard of right and wrong?

Our ideas of right and wrong, under this system, are merely outcomes of some chemical processes that occur in the brain, which happened to confer survival advantage on our alleged ape-like ancestors. But the notions in Hitler’s brain obeyed the same chemical laws as those in Mother Teresa’s, so on what grounds are the latter’s actions ‘better’ than the former’s? Also, why should a terrorist attack slaying thousands of people in New York be more terrible than a frog eating thousands of flies? Human life isn't very special on atheism.Most atheists are pro choice killing pre borns in the womb. Are you? It is easy to see why. It is impossible to get to objective morality on atheism. That would mean there would have to be an objective moral law giver . An Ultimate.
The atheist dare not posit an Ultimate Guarantor of objective morals.

A Christian, however, believes there is an objective standard of morality that rises above individual humans, because it is set by an objective and transcendent moral Lawgiver who is our Creator. An atheist’s argument against God because of objective evil inadvertently concedes the very point he is trying to argue against!

Belief in evolution and/or millions of years of history necessitates that death has been a part of history since life first appeared on this planet. If you believe that the fossil layers (containing billions of dead things) represent the history of life over millions of years, it’s a very ugly record—full of death, disease and suffering.
Christians who believe in millions of years of history have a serious problem. The Bible plainly says that God is the Creator, and He called everything that He had made—before, leading up to, and including Adam and Eve, but before their Fall—‘very good’ (Genesis 1:31).
As soon as Christians allow for death, suffering and disease before Adam’s sin (which they automatically must if they believe in millions of years), then they’ve raised a serious question about their Gospel message. What, then, has sin done to the world? According to Christian teaching, death is the penalty for sin (Romans 6:23)—and this fact is the foundation of the Gospel! Moreover, how can all things be ‘restored’ to a state with no death, pain or tears in the future (Revelation 21:4) if there never was a time free of death and suffering? The whole message of the Gospel falls apart if you have this view of history. It also would mean that God is to blame for death.
Fortunately, God has given us a different account of the history of death, recorded in His Word—the TaNaK ( Torah,Nabiim Ketuvim- law Prophets ,Writings - Old Testament ) and New Testament added together to give us the Christian Bible. This historical document connects to real issues of life, and it fully explains why horrible things happen. In fact, God’s Word has much to say about death.

‘Sin and death.’
This phrase sums up the true history of death, as recorded in Genesis, the first book of the Bible. God originally created a perfect world, described by God as ‘very good’ (Genesis 1:31). People and animals ate plants, not other animals (Genesis 1:29–30). There was no violence or pain in this ‘very good’ world
But this sinless world was marred by the rebellion of the first man, Adam. His sin brought an intruder into the world—death. God had told him if he disobeyed and ate from a certain tree that death would result. He succumbed to temptation and ate and it affected all.
The Bible makes it clear that death is the penalty for our sin, not just the sin of Adam. If you accept the Bible’s account of history, then our sins—not just the sins of ‘the other guy’—are responsible for all the death and suffering in the world! In other words, it is really our fault that the world is the way it is. No-one is really ‘innocent.’

Jesus said something that is directly applicable to modern tragedies, such as the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in the United States on September 11, 2001. Luke 13:4 records His words: ‘Those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them—do you think they were sinners above all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no!’ Suffering in our lives is not always related to our personal sins , however,Jesus went on to say that ‘unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.’ Though this may have been referring to perishing physically in the coming downfall of Jerusalem, the bottom line is that no-one is innocent. All of us are sinners and therefore condemned to die. The question is will we all
turn to God?
If you spent less time answering questions you haven't been asked...
 
The knowledge and personal belief that Christ ( Ha Maschiach) has taken the punishment on Himself , the blame for every sin,past present and future is what assures new life in the present and eternal life in heaven or paradise. . It is the simple good news message.
Death passed on to every man because of the one man Adam's transgression. Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned.
There would have been no death had Adam not ate of that tree of knowledge of good and evil. Although it took him a long time to die, the process had begun.
He was asked to eat from any tree exceot the one that would bring death. Could have ate from thousands upon thousands of other trees but because the evil one tempted them both with a lie" you won't really die" ,which is calling God a liar, they fell for it in their choice of self-interests rather than God's interest for them, the making of self the chief end and with Adam putting his own authority above God's.All of us are like that. We are no different than Adam in our selfishness and and listen to the tempter to varying degrees.
Apart from there was no Adam or eve or apple or garden of Eden. Let's not even get onto talking snakes. And why for fuck sake, if he didn't want him to eat from it, did he put it there in the first place?! Couldn't he have put it on top of a mountain or something, or put a child lock on it.
 
everything-horror-join-the-team.gif
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top