birchwoodgingerste
Well-Known Member
If thats true why is the omicron strain more powerfull rather than less.?It’s far more likely that mutations become weaker than stronger. Viruses don’t want to kill their host.
If thats true why is the omicron strain more powerfull rather than less.?It’s far more likely that mutations become weaker than stronger. Viruses don’t want to kill their host.
It’s more transmissible. The signs so far suggest it is less potent that delta, but on limited data.If thats true why is the omicron strain more powerfull rather than less.?
More transmissable but less potent thats a new one.It’s more transmissible. The signs so far suggest it is less potent that delta, but on limited data.
Like a cold Is?More transmissable but less potent thats a new one.
But if everyones had a jab so are more protected then surely the data would be inconclusive would it not??Like a cold Is?
Tramissability and death rates don’t have to go in the same direction.
Only 24% of Saffers have, from what I read.But if everyones had a jab so are more protected then surely the data would be inconclusive would it not??
It wouldn’t be inconclusive, but it wouldn’t be 100% accurate to the U.K.But if everyones had a jab so are more protected then surely the data would be inconclusive would it not??
Ok thanks for taking time to explain.It wouldn’t be inconclusive, but it wouldn’t be 100% accurate to the U.K.
They could take the percentage of vaccinated and do ratios, but we are dealing with a potential variant with a significantly different protein spike, so they have to work out how effective current vaccines are against it too.
We’ll get through this. We’re not far off now.Ok thanks for taking time to exsplain.
Hope so pal fingers crossed.We’ll get through this. We’re not far off now.
It's worth understanding that like animals, viruses are living beings whose primary function is to survive and spread.More transmissable but less potent thats a new one.
Backs up what alan harpers tash was saying makes sense now thanks for posting.It's worth understanding that like animals, viruses are living beings whose primary function is to survive and spread.
COVID is hyper spreadable. And it has the bonus skill of going undetected for a while which makes it even better at spreading. It doesn't actually need to be as potent as it is to survive and flourish in humans (it came from bats which do require heavy duty viruses to bypass their immune systems), it only needs to be potent enough to get to a point where it can get a heavy load in a person and then spread on to the next ones.
So if it's managed to become more transmissible somehow, it is likely going to be anywhere from equally potent as before (unlikely), or less potent (likely). It wouldn't have gained anything from being more potent. It's even more likely that being less potent is what made it more transmissible, and not the other way around.
Also I'm not 100% sure of this, but viruses need living cells to replicate because of how basic they are. So it's a biological disadvantage to them if their hosts die.Backs up what alan harpers tash was saying makes sense now thanks for posting.
Is it? Where have you read that?If thats true why is the omicron strain more powerfull rather than less.?
All the variants so far have been roughly as potent as each other so the likelihood is that the new variant will have similar potency. It may not of course:It's worth understanding that like animals, viruses are living beings whose primary function is to survive and spread.
COVID is hyper spreadable. And it has the bonus skill of going undetected for a while which makes it even better at spreading. It doesn't actually need to be as potent as it is to survive and flourish in humans (it came from bats which do require heavy duty viruses to bypass their immune systems), it only needs to be potent enough to get to a point where it can get a heavy load in a person and then spread on to the next ones.
So if it's managed to become more transmissible somehow, it is likely going to be anywhere from equally potent as before (unlikely), or less potent (likely). It wouldn't have gained anything from being more potent. It's even more likely that being less potent is what made it more transmissible, and not the other way around.
![]()
S.African doctor says patients with Omicron variant have "very mild" symptoms
A South African doctor who was one of the first to suspect a different coronavirus strain among patients said on Sunday that symptoms of the Omicron variant were so far mild and could be treated at home.www.reuters.com
Good grief. Some of the £37bn on our "World-beating" (not) test and trace would have been better spent on vaccines for poor countries.vaccines should be sent to poor countries for sure ! sadly they dont have the money to pay for them!
Be interesting to see if all the works xmas parties go ahead.