I can see a lot of the so called "neutrals" changing their title winner predictions to City, while having a big moan.
To paraphrase something I just watched on youtube: "It should be Liverpool's era, what Klopp has built should be era defining but it wont be because of what City are doing and because they have Pep. I now think you need the backing of an oligarch or a state to do it. That's why I think Liverpool wont get over the line this year."
That was from someone who supports Chelsea of all clubs. He also said they've been playing some of the best football under Klopp this year(sounds suspiciously like he's trying to counter something said about another certain club there...)and that their defence is back to as solid as it was before VVD's injury.
I know their forwards, Salah in particular, have been on fire so far but am I right in thinking he's over-egging it a bit with some of those statements? I haven't been watching a lot Liverpool's football this year though I suppose but their defence and control of the games I have seen didn't indicate the best of Klopp's Liverpool or anything of the sort. Not that they haven't been good or that it's not possible that they do find that kind of form, if everything falls into place for them.
I'd rather City go under the radar personally, until they go on another 10-15 game winning streak before most have noticed. We seem to do better that way. Only 1 point clear, there's a long way to go yet. There's no room for complacency or letting that "City will win it" talk, get into the players and fans heads. This could be another long title race, that goes right up to or including May and everyone needs to be ready for it.