He could be a scouser seeing as it’s never his fault
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
United Thread - 2021/22
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
He could be a scouser seeing as it’s never his fault
Grassland Blue
Well-Known Member
Either I think.Or is it makes the rags More Shit?
Shit can be a noun or a verb.
ted the grass
Well-Known Member
Possibly included a few snide (handshake) clauses with their 'partnership' sponsors to assure Rondildos presence in all major games...I’m not sure that Ragnick CAN drop the old boy, Marvin.
The rumours were that his deal included a clause that gave him the right to play every game that he wanted, and I’ve not seen anything to suggest that’s not the case.
It’s kind of understandable; he probably earns more from his image rights than his football and he needs himself / his image to be on our screens constantly to keep that up.
Employing him wasn’t a footballing decision, it was partly to boost united’s sponsorship income but it was more due to the Glazers understanding that his reputation would bump their share price so that they could reassign and offload shares (to buy an Indian cricket team) before the share price quickly settled again.
And that’s exactly what they did.
mancityvstoke
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 21,505
- Location
- Vintage terraced Kippax
- Team supported
- The only football team to come from Manchester
Shittiererer
Buffon recently said Ronaldo ruined the team in Turin, it's all about adapting the whole team to his needs while neglecting the rest of the team and tactics to beat the opposition, Juve regressed and United are doing the same for a guy approaching 40 years old.He could be a scouser seeing as it’s never his fault
That’s my guess as well - clause to play when fit. I’d also forgotten about any sponsorships and potential penalty clauses if the fading star didn’t play.I’m not sure that Ragnick CAN drop the old boy, Marvin.
The rumours were that his deal included a clause that gave him the right to play every game that he wanted, and I’ve not seen anything to suggest that’s not the case.
It’s kind of understandable; he probably earns more from his image rights than his football and he needs himself / his image to be on our screens constantly to keep that up.
Employing him wasn’t a footballing decision, it was partly to boost united’s sponsorship income but it was more due to the Glazers understanding that his reputation would bump their share price so that they could reassign and offload shares (to buy an Indian cricket team) before the share price quickly settled again.
And that’s exactly what they did.
The outrage of Ferguson when ole dropped him was breathtaking. But if it had cost united his weekly wage in lost sponsorship then it’s not surprising he blew up.
nellyonthewing
Well-Known Member
I derive so much pleasure from watching the twats self implode . After suffering decades of darkness we have emerged victorious and glorious. I often questioned where god was when they triumphed using every cheating bent bias lying scheming trick with impunity. The fact they still exist is a dark shadow on the game. I really do not like them.
I loathe the twat but even I wouldn’t wish that on him.He could be a scouser seeing as it’s never his fault
- Status
- Not open for further replies.