Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor / Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Octavian said:
He might be a dirty **** who needs locking up but come back when you’ve served your country to a greater degree than him in the military :
Click to expand...

How many other helicopter pilots served their country to the same or greater extent and were not given the titles of -

  • Honorary air commodore of RAF Lossiemouth
  • Colonel-in-chief of the Royal Irish Regiment
  • Colonel-in-chief of the Small Arms School Corps
  • Commodore-in-Chief of the Fleet Air Arm
  • Royal colonel of the Royal Highland Fusiliers
  • Deputy colonel-in-chief of The Royal Lancers (Queen Elizabeths' Own)
  • Royal colonel of the Royal Regiment of Scotland.
Not to mention being a fucking Vice Admiral for 6 weeks service.
 
domalino said:
How many other helicopter pilots served their country to the same or greater extent and were not given the titles of -

  • Honorary air commodore of RAF Lossiemouth
  • Colonel-in-chief of the Royal Irish Regiment
  • Colonel-in-chief of the Small Arms School Corps
  • Commodore-in-Chief of the Fleet Air Arm
  • Royal colonel of the Royal Highland Fusiliers
  • Deputy colonel-in-chief of The Royal Lancers (Queen Elizabeths' Own)
  • Royal colonel of the Royal Regiment of Scotland.
Click to expand...
How many have captained a warship?
 
Octavian said:
William and Kate are extremely popular as public figures. When the Queen goes there will be an enormous outpouring of grief across the nation that will probably see Charlie through until he passes it on to his far more popular son.

Only 23% voted negative feeling in the latest Yougov poll about Charles. William it’s 12%.

The monarchy will still be here in hundreds of years.
Click to expand...
It shouldn’t be a popularity contest. Sounds like one of singing competitions on TV. I’ve no doubt the family will still exist. It certainly won’t be in the public eye as it is now. You seem desperate about it all. You don’t know them. You know what the PR machine wants you to know. The corruption surrounding them stinks. Folk like you see past it all like they want you to. It’s all very silly when you sit back and think about it.
 
Pedestrian said:
It shouldn’t be a popularity contest. Sounds like one of singing competitions on TV. I’ve no doubt the family will still exist. It certainly won’t be in the public eye as it is now. You seem desperate about it all. You don’t know them. You know what the PR machine wants you to know. The corruption surrounding them stinks. Folk like you see past it all like they want you to. It’s all very silly when you sit back and think about it.
Click to expand...
No you daft sod, popularity is important because they’re going nowhere whilst the public likes them. And more like even Charles than don’t, and his successor is very popular. No government is going to bring anything against the monarchy to get rid whilst the public support them and even with this latest scandal, they’re very popular. The public would have to be chomping at the bit to get rid of them for any Prime Minister to have the balls for constitutional change and even then they’d probably pass the buck and try and not disrupt it.

I’m a royalist because of the institution being good for the country rather than any celebrity aspect to it. I don’t about weddings or whatever, I respect the Queen and the institution.
 
Octavian said:
No you daft sod, popularity is important because they’re going nowhere whilst the public likes them. And more like even Charles than don’t, and his successor is very popular. No government is going to bring anything against the monarchy to get rid whilst the public support them and even with this latest scandal, they’re very popular. The public would have to be chomping at the bit to get rid of them for any Prime Minister to have the balls for constitutional change and even then they’d probably pass the buck and try and not disrupt it.

I’m a royalist because of the institution being good for the country rather than any celebrity aspect to it. I don’t about weddings or whatever, I respect the Queen and the institution.
Click to expand...
‘Daft sod’?. Maybe if you’ve served your country like I have you would have a bit more respect for other people..
Just out of interest do you respect the corruption that goes along with the family/estate?
 
Fode N The Hole said:
I was being generous, otherwise I think it definitely is Richard III, if we use our masters and betters' narrower definition.
Click to expand...
Definitely "last monarch" then.
Always felt a bit sorry for Ric 3, think the Tudors did a right hatchet job on him (although understandable, all things considered in context).
Did a lot of good did Ric 3.
 
domalino said:
Honorary captain.

And what did he do to deserve the title of captain other than drop out of the right womb?
Click to expand...
Go and look it up, he served in the Military for 20 years before becoming a commander and he did earn it. They don’t let someone captain a ship just because of who their mother is.

The benefit he got was access to training that maybe others wouldn’t at certain points in his career but he did work his way up and he’s very highly skilled.

It’s possible to respect his military background but not his behaviour in his personal time which is obviously disgusting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top