lol no surprise
lol no surprise
I think the former. It'd have been made more obvious if it were the latterA further 2 as in the further 2 he already had to serve, or another 2 on top of that?
He’s a journalist, words are his job, you’d think he’d have made it clear. Mind you most journalists are fucking thick so that explains itI think the former. It'd have been made more obvious if it were the latter
It was made clear when we lodged the appeal that UEFA couldn't make the ban longer, so a further 2 means the 2nd leg and the q/f first legA further 2 as in the further 2 he already had to serve, or another 2 on top of that?
Appreciate the reply but for those of us who haven’t read everything about everything it’d help if one of these gutter press cunts could write clearly. Thanks for clarifyingIt was made clear when we lodged the appeal that UEFA couldn't make the ban longer, so a further 2 means the 2nd leg and the q/f first leg
We will still be in it!Can't complain, really. It was worth the appeal if the club thought they could present evidence to suggest the punishment was harsh.
But it was a bloody stupid thing for him to do and the best response now is for us to make sure when his ban is over we're still in the competition.
Well we know if they can put a negative slant on anything city related they will!! No problem clarifying and apologies if my answer came across a bit arsey... it wasn't meant that wayAppreciate the reply but for those of us who haven’t read everything about everything it’d help if one of these gutter press cunts could write clearly. Thanks for clarifying
Hopefully by still being in it... you don't mean in the same way that Sporting Lisbon are still in it ;-)We will still be in it!