Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
I again will defend him when he deserves to be defended but also criticise him when it's due and think my posts on here reflect that.

He does look a twat if he tweeted that in isolation BUT he didn't. It is someone else clickbaiting one para from his latest Athletic article and taken completely out of context. The article is actually a Dinho puff piece. Full article here and not behind a paywall:

Who thinks Fernandinho has been treated unfairly, a faceless, nameless source close to a faceless, nameless player. It’s an article about how great Fernandinho is & yet after all that he’s been treated badly by City.
He doesn’t look unhappy, his behaviours aren’t that of someone unhappy & I think you’d be hard pressed to find evidence of City treating him unfairly, it’s a shit sandwich.
 
I must have missed Burnley's amazing pre 2008 teams whilst i was shouting abuse at Nicky Summerbee from a safe distance in the stands.

And if this forum proves anything it is that when you get a whole bunch of fans of the same team in the same place at the same time then good decisions and sensible attitudes prevail. We might at last sort out the away ticket allocation and pre march entertainment to everyones liking.
You and the Burnley fan have missed the fact Burnley are currently spending their longest spell in top flight footy since 1970.
All that PL money enabling them to compete in the top flight!
 
My experience is that the word “Manchester” has been synonymous with “United” for my entire life. Indeed, traveling the world, the mere mention of being from Manchester elicits “Manchester United.”

In fact, in the pre-Mansour era, because of the way most teams are based on the name of their town, the word “Manchester” actually MEANT “Manchester United”!

CFG is a branding effort to secure the word “City” for us is, in my opinion, BECAUSE of the above fact.

It is much easier to say “City” in any language on earth than the whole thing, especially when you would have to overcome the tears of “Manchester” being associated with the Rags.

As foreign owners, I think management understands this friction and seeks to avoid it, while creating a new narrative.

I don’t think it is coincidence that the East Stand (directly opposite the TV cameras!!!) is now emblazoned with “CITY” or that “City” is being used on leisurewear.

Yes, it is painful for Manchester locals to think of their home town as associated with the Rags, but outside of a 60 mile radius of Piccadilly, no-one really cares about us making the “they’re not even in Manchester” reference!

Sadly, when football blew up on satellite TV and then internet cable, United were on top and we were doing the roundtrip through the Leagues. That isn’t going to change with time, so why spend precious money and effort trying to change it?

We are always going to be Man City, with the “City” part being the defining characteristic, so why not promote that.

It was clear from the outset of the Holding Company being named that the GLOBAL project was about helping make the team name “City” synonymous with Man City as the halo club, but in also (wherever and whenever feasible) having CFG clubs carry that name and wear the sky blue…which is yet another branding effort.

The hope is that when the word “City” or the sky blue shirt colour is seen on a team, the footballing public THINKS Man City/CFG.

If we can accomplish that, commercial contracts become ever more valuable and the global football “istree” of “Manchester” being synonymous with the Rags becomes ever more irrelevant.
Yep in Spain for example we are almost universally referred to as “El City” on their TV and in their papers
 

Julian Alvarez reacts to Pep Guardiola comments on Man City transfer plan​

Manchester City striker Julian Alvarez scored his fourth goal of the season for River Plate and responded to Pep Guardiola's recent comments.

Julian Alvarez admitted he was 'angry' despite scoring for River Plate on Wednesday night as he was asked about Pep Guardiola's recent praise for him

Ok so draw your own conclusions from that. Later in the article is this

Alvarez scored River's second in a 5-0 win, reaching 40 goals for the club. But the youngster admitted he was 'angry' after the game as he felt he missed a number of chances.
 
Out in the car and was listening to Talking Balls on radio Manc. Was half an hour Rags talking about winning the Champs League (!), 7 mins of City re Stones and Laporte and then back to United and Marcus Rashford. Turned it over then. Is it always like that ?.

Did it take half an hour for the laughter to subside?
 
I really do think twats like him and the what's app group are being given enough rope by city to eventually hang themselves...I would think any good journalist knows this as well...they keep chipping away peddaling the narrative about city...I don't anything about our media department but iam sure they have their ear to everything that gets said and at some point will go after them big time...they won't let it go forever...I believe I read what another journalist said about citys media department that they know everything that gets said and written and are proactive in putting certain media in its place...one day ladies and gentlemen and I do believe this,some members of the what's app group are going to be in for a shock.....its just my humble thoughts...
Somehow, I doubt it. At the time of the CAS case, enough lies were told to fill Wembley, but we did nothing. The policy of no overt action will come from the top. I believe this policy is a mistake.
I wish you were right but I won't hold my breath.
 
I get paranoid on this issue & fear their constant lobbying, given the current climate with Abramovich, could lead somehow to our ownership being targeted. There is no solid information or factual cause for this to happen but it's just a fear I have, as their constant smearing has definitely had an effect on the reputation of our club. Certainly in the UK anyway. They are like a dog with a bone who are intent to see our Club brought down and replaced by their beloved ones, who's ownerships can apparently do no wrong.

I don't have anything to back this up by the way, it's just a fear I have that's been heightened this week by the on goings at Chelsea.
Fear not. They will keep on trying but will fail. For a start, UK gov will never sanction an ally and any official action against City would need a new law. Won't happen.
 
I understand there has been a series of UN resolutions since the first one, each one with different elements. Some experts believe the only way out of this crisis will be if the Chinese put pressure on Russia. The Chinese have a lot to lose if World War 3 breaks out. They are not condemning Russia publically but hopefully they are working behind the scenes. Other experts believe the Chinese are playing a waiting game because they want to claim back Taiwan. What a bloody mess.
"The Chinese have a lot to lose if World War 3 breaks out."
Don't we all!
Wins the prize for the understatement of the year.
 
"The Chinese have a lot to lose if World War 3 breaks out."
Don't we all!
Wins the prize for the understatement of the year.
The Chinese aren't ready yet for a serious confrontation. Give them ten more years, and then we will have something to worry about :)
 
I didn't realise how many of these anti-city journalists were Chelsea fans. The hypocrisy of their positions over the years, is really quite ridiculous when put into the proper context(are they deranged enough not to see it?).

I suppose it's not even a question of if but when are the whatsapp group going to start asking "but but what about City?" rather than focussing on what's actually relevant right now. It would only confirm they don't give a damn about anyone or anything but themselves and their agendas. We already know they have no integrity, they mostly operate behind faux moral crusades, lies, bile and hate mongering as it is.
Yeah, but what are they doing wrong?
 
He didn't mention terrorism but the same could be said of Saudi too on that subject. No real evidence of the governments involvement in many of the claims made against them. I think it's obvious Iran have their hands just as dirty as Saudi personally.

The war in Yemen very much is a proxy war between Iran and Saudi though, it doesn't make sense explained any other way to me. Some say it's even Russia-Iran vs USA-Saudi.

Saudi's belief was that Iran's government tried to install a proxy government in Yemen(not that their actions are justified either way, neither was the USA's/UK's in Iraq). Ironically, as I understand it, the Iran Revolution came about because many saw the Shah as a proxy/puppet of the USA/west. They helped install him(CIA, assisted by the MI6) and he relied on them to help him keep his power for many years too. I don't see why so many are in denial about the way governments operate, trying to paint one as angels and the other as devils is just not rational thinking to me.
I think, as you have said elsewhere, rational thinking in geopolitical affairs is as rare as a Rashford goal.
 
I didn't realise how many of these anti-city journalists were Chelsea fans. The hypocrisy of their positions over the years, is really quite ridiculous when put into the proper context(are they deranged enough not to see it?).

I suppose it's not even a question of if but when are the whatsapp group going to start asking "but but what about City?" rather than focussing on what's actually relevant right now. It would only confirm they don't give a damn about anyone or anything but themselves and their agendas. We already know they have no integrity, they mostly operate behind faux moral crusades, lies, bile and hate mongering as it is.

This new journalism is a double-edged sword. They may generate clicks and have a large number of followers, but they have no gravitas. No-one of any import is listening to them or taking them remotely seriously. It's all just howling in the wind.
 
Remind me of a similar story recently leaked about senior rag players unhappy that Jesse Shingard isn't playing more regularly for the 1st team.
aT8csLU.gif
He has a good agent.
 
If the FM lawyers see that they will be claiming damages for breaching copyright restrictions. Its a straight lift from the "unhappy player demanding more time on the pitch" twist in the game.
It's in all the agents' handbooks under "Ploy 24".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top