Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know it's pretty but if we win the title on Sunday. Pep and the players should celebrate with the fans and ignore the Sky Sports reporter. Club release a pre prepared statement saying the contractual post match media press conference is where players and the manager will talk.

What's the worse the PL could do. Fine us?
 
mat said:
I know it's pretty but if we win the title on Sunday. Pep and the players should celebrate with the fans and ignore the Sky Sports reporter. Club release a pre prepared statement saying the contractual post match media press conference is where players and the manager will talk.

What's the worse the PL could do. Fine us?
Click to expand...

Let the tea ladies do it ….
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat
Bonzo Nododo said:
The indignation from the media after Pep mentioned bias and Tyler's reaction to being booed by City fans shows that these people have long forgotten how to be unbiased and they don't know they are doing it.
Anyone claiming no bias at the BBC should be directed to that clip of Vinnies goal against
Leicester. Such a wonderful goal and no less dramatic than Kuns but the entire Radio 5 studio was stunned to silence, the only sound being salty tears falling to the ground.
No bias? YCNMIU.
Click to expand...
The BBC is institutionally biased against City. The internal culture at BBC Online is so embedded they just can't see it. The whole organisation is totally politicised and they can't cover football in a straight impartial way. The story selection, the social media feeds, people like Dan Roan literally never tweets out a positive City story, the snide defamatory comments on stories which are left out there. The constant mocking of City and lack of respect which they claim is just banter. It really isn't banter it's trolling which is very different.
They keep saying City fans are paranoid and deluded but what's happening is obvious to match-going fans from other clubs. The BBC's complaint process has essentially collapsed (I have been told this by someone senior who works there). They dismiss complains out of hand. There is an arrogance from Desk Editors about their content which doesn't happen on the same scale anywhere else. The culture is they believe they never make mistakes and when they are caught out the culture is to cover it up. The online team knows that Ofcom are taking years to process complaints because they are overwhelmed with complaints about BBC online. No one is held to account.
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
The BBC is institutionally biased against City. The internal culture at BBC Online is so embedded they just can't see it. The whole organisation is totally politicised and they can't cover football in a straight impartial way. The story selection, the social media feeds, people like Dan Roan literally never tweets out a positive City story, the snide defamatory comments on stories which are left out there. The constant mocking of City and lack of respect which they claim is just banter. It really isn't banter it's trolling which is very different.
They keep saying City fans are paranoid and deluded but what's happening is obvious to match-going fans from other clubs. The BBC's complaint process has essentially collapsed (I have been told this by someone senior who works there). They dismiss complains out of hand. There is an arrogance from Desk Editors about their content which doesn't happen on the same scale anywhere else. The culture is they believe they never make mistakes and when they are caught out the culture is to cover it up. The online team knows that Ofcom are taking years to process complaints because they are overwhelmed with complaints about BBC online. No one is held to account.
Click to expand...
I submitted a complaint a while back about them being institutionally biased and got a standard cut & paste non-apology basically saying that it was 'unfortunate' that I felt the way I did and they always strive hard to produce 'fair and unbiased content'.

Not a f*cking chance they 'strive' to do anything fair and unbiased. I totally get that presenters and reporters are fans of particular clubs, and I can forgive them for the odd wry grin or an nod and a wink (see Clive Myrie), but these b@stards go out of their way to be c*nts about it. It's 100% on purpose.
 
Trevor Morley's Tache said:
I submitted a complaint a while back about them being institutionally biased and got a standard cut & paste non-apology basically saying that it was 'unfortunate' that I felt the way I did and they always strive hard to produce 'fair and unbiased content'.

Not a f*cking chance they 'strive' to do anything fair and unbiased. I totally get that presenters and reporters are fans of particular clubs, and I can forgive them for the odd wry grin or an nod and a wink (see Clive Myrie), but these b@stards go out of their way to be c*nts about it. It's 100% on purpose.
Click to expand...
Last nights coverage was a case in point
 
Kinkys Left Foot said:
In other news Liverpool fans have paid several thousand pounds for a giant billboard at the end of Deansgate that says "We don't care about City"




The rabid vermin infested cultists cunts.
Click to expand...
It's just been on the dinner time news, inflation to hit 9%. People choosing between food and heating will look at that poster in amazement. If they really didn't care, spend the money on your hungry Merseysiders you sad sack of shits.
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
I see the Gundo leaving City and off to Madrid has been totally debunked by the club and Pep. Gundo went to Madrid to get married in secret and suggestions that "City sources" were happy to let him leave were false. So another fake news story by Mike Keegan in the Daily Mail. Surprise fucking surprise. You would think we had a big match coming up. I wonder which poisonous source tipped off the Mail with the false story and who he works for. Organised and clear.
Click to expand...
Rebekah Vardy?
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
I see the Gundo leaving City and off to Madrid has been totally debunked by the club and Pep. Gundo went to Madrid to get married in secret and suggestions that "City sources" were happy to let him leave were false. So another fake news story by Mike Keegan in the Daily Mail. Surprise fucking surprise. You would think we had a big match coming up. I wonder which poisonous source tipped off the Mail with the false story and who he works for. Organised and clear.
Click to expand...
City were happy for him to leave , to pop over to Madrid and get hitched
City fail to wrap up league yet again after the Quad squad beat high flying, in form ,big spending Saints
Fernandino will leave in mass summer exodus
Pep won’t sign new contract …………………….. yet
Haaland could weaken City
Gerrard promises Champions elect Redz, “I won’t slip this time“
Paris welcomes the worlds biggest and best support with open arms
blah blah blah blah

Pep was right, what more motivation do we need for Sunday
 
Trevor Morley's Tache said:
I submitted a complaint a while back about them being institutionally biased and got a standard cut & paste non-apology basically saying that it was 'unfortunate' that I felt the way I did and they always strive hard to produce 'fair and unbiased content'.

Not a f*cking chance they 'strive' to do anything fair and unbiased. I totally get that presenters and reporters are fans of particular clubs, and I can forgive them for the odd wry grin or an nod and a wink (see Clive Myrie), but these b@stards go out of their way to be c*nts about it. It's 100% on purpose.
Click to expand...
I complained two years ago about an overtly racist report on their news page. It stated that the Rui Pinto leaks had uncovered evidence of financial wrongdoing by football clubs (including City) which had been influenced by what they called "Gulf Arabs." The story was totally false because the Pinto leaks case was to do with agents from Eastern Europe and Turkey and their influence on matters at Benfica and Sporting Lisbon. The BBC didn't respond within the legal time period so I batted it to Ofcom. Ofcom asked the BBC to respond but the BBC still ignored the complaint. I went back to Ofcom who said there was nothing they could do because they had a huge backlog of BBC complaints to deal with. The BBC is accountable to no one which is one of the reasons why it is facing destruction from hostile politicians. I used to defend the BBC but now I see it for what it is.
 
Blue Mist said:
It's just been on the dinner time news, inflation to hit 9%. People choosing between food and heating will look at that poster in amazement. If they really didn't care, spend the money on your hungry Merseysiders you sad sack of shits.
Click to expand...
I suspect that it was a joke about the billboard.

(at least I'm hoping it is)
 
Blue Mist said:
It's just been on the dinner time news, inflation to hit 9%. People choosing between food and heating will look at that poster in amazement. If they really didn't care, spend the money on your hungry Merseysiders you sad sack of shits.
Click to expand...
I think the OP might be joking as that end of Deansgate wasn't there when I came into work this morning
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
I complained two years ago about an overtly racist report on their news page. It stated that the Rui Pinto leaks had uncovered evidence of financial wrongdoing by football clubs (including City) which had been influenced by what they called "Gulf Arabs." The story was totally false because the Pinto leaks case was to do with agents from Eastern Europe and Turkey and their influence on matters at Benfica and Sporting Lisbon. The BBC didn't respond within the legal time period so I batted it to Ofcom. Ofcom asked the BBC to respond but the BBC still ignored the complaint. I went back to Ofcom who said there was nothing they could do because they had a huge backlog of BBC complaints to deal with. The BBC is accountable to no one which is one of the reasons why it is facing destruction from hostile politicians. I used to defend the BBC but now I see it for what it is.
Click to expand...
OFCOM is utterly toothless when it comes to our National Broadcaster. BBC content reaches MILLIONS of people, and they can essentially do and say what they want with relative impunity. But I'd imagine OFCOME would come down me like a tonne of bricks if my shady Chinese WiFi extender disrupted my next door neighbours TV signal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top