Gareth Barry Conlon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2014
- Messages
- 13,935
Nothing says guilt like pleading the 5th...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
US Politics Thread
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
ADegenerate
Well-Known Member
???Alright Karl.
Bigga
Well-Known Member
Honestly, that clown offers no debate about anything, not even offering an opinion about the way forward.
You could go back years and it's the same thing.
Save your time.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 88,276
Marx.
BlueMoonAcrossThePond
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 5,288
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Nothing says guilt like pleading the 5th...
Spot on. The fucker should have said:
"Based on the advice of Council, I refuse to answer on the ground that my answer may tend to incriminate me."
BlueMoonAcrossThePond
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 5,288
- Team supported
- Manchester City
The 1/6 hearings have painted a clear picture of a guilty-as-hell Trump attempting to foment insurrection.
The million dollar question is this: Will the DOJ level charges against Trump?
IMO - probably not. Roughly 1/2 of the USA don't believe that the hearings are legitimate. Unless there's irrefutable, ironclad evidence of wrongdoing - e.g., Trump on video footage saying and doing the things he's purported to have said and done - I think that the DOJ won't level charges. No jury agreed upon by both prosecution and defense would ever convict him absent such evidence.
The million dollar question is this: Will the DOJ level charges against Trump?
IMO - probably not. Roughly 1/2 of the USA don't believe that the hearings are legitimate. Unless there's irrefutable, ironclad evidence of wrongdoing - e.g., Trump on video footage saying and doing the things he's purported to have said and done - I think that the DOJ won't level charges. No jury agreed upon by both prosecution and defense would ever convict him absent such evidence.
west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 30,839
They'll probably follow the Al Capone route and convict him of one of his indefensible tax frauds.The 1/6 hearings have painted a clear picture of a guilty-as-hell Trump attempting to foment insurrection.
The million dollar question is this: Will the DOJ level charges against Trump?
IMO - probably not. Roughly 1/2 of the USA don't believe that the hearings are legitimate. Unless there's irrefutable, ironclad evidence of wrongdoing - e.g., Trump on video footage saying and doing the things he's purported to have said and done - I think that the DOJ won't level charges. No jury agreed upon by both prosecution and defense would ever convict him absent such evidence.
BlueMoonAcrossThePond
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 5,288
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Same problem - no jury will convict. I think that state prosecutors though might well risk non-conviction - it'd be a huge feather in their career cap even so long as a good case is presented - even if conviction isn't achieved.They'll probably follow the Al Capone route and convict him of one of his indefensible tax frauds.
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
Spot on. The fucker should have said:
"Based on the advice of Council, I refuse to answer on the ground that my answer may tend to incriminate me."
Counsel.
BlueMoonAcrossThePond
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 5,288
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Console my misuse of "Council" oh great Counselor.Counsel.