Alexandole Boris de Pfeffel Johnson

Respectfully - no, you don’t. You believe your political leanings are for the good of the country but that doesn’t make you automatically right, nor does it make you automatically wrong. You just have an opinion - the same as the rest of us - but to make out you care more about the country than someone else is a bit wank.
Not when it’s protecting your own political party before helping people, it isn’t. That makes the person making that point a bit of a ****.

Weve tried 3 years of having an utter **** in charge. Almost anybody else taking over will be of some benefit to the country.
 
What a shame. Boris is the only PM I've ever liked but anyone in that job is going to get shot down in flames. He's done the right thing getting out of that cesspit of cunts.
Step forward the next citizen smith doing their best wolfie impression through lying eyes.
If this isn’t a wum then get yourself to a loony bin
 
it's a divided country, two-party politics means what one hates the other loves. throw in the London versus the rest, the old v young, inherited wealth v renters, expoiters v exploited, it becomes the least worse is what you are forced to choose. f'kin mess.
Add in the toxicity of Brexit
 
Doesn't matter who or which party comes next. Country is ungovernable.
Johnson will become an Aunt Sally but the problems are much deeper than him. Scotland needs to become independent, the situation in Northern Ireland needs to be resolved, and then England needs to change its electoral system and decide what it wants to do. The fantasy of ‘levelling up’ also dies today, so people should be told the truth of what lies ahead.

It’s time for politicians from all sides to sit down and do their job, as years of doing nothing has made everyone poorer.
 
To what end though mate? He won’t be able to get any new policy through. If he is unable to form a cabinet then I’d concur with you but in the absence of that it seems like creating chaos for the sake of it. On the international stage Johnson has actually done ok (ignoring Brexit, particularly the furore with the NI protocol for a minute), with the Ukraine war the world needs continuation not more chaos or crisis. What this country, or the world, doesn’t need is some leadership hopeful taking the reigns and using it as an leadership campaign.

He’s gone. Rejoice at that.
I was doing, till I read that sycophantic nonsense.
 
Respectfully - no, you don’t. You believe your political leanings are for the good of the country but that doesn’t make you automatically right, nor does it make you automatically wrong. You just have an opinion - the same as the rest of us - but to make out you care more about the country than someone else is a bit wank.
Your wasting your time.
Unfortunately there are quite a few on here with the it’s my way or the highway that think just like him. They are on each and every politics thread so very easy to spot.
Fortunately they are a minority and will never be in a position of power so they are harmless really.
 
I don’t think many realise this.
If someone else comes in and does a half decent job there is only 1 Party going to benefit at the next election and I think we can safely say it’s not the Party that most posters support on here.
Only because of braindead voters. Not mentioning any names.
 
Possibly not, although there's hardly an abundance of outstanding candidates lined up to replace him. Suella Braverman and Steve Baker the first to throw their hats into the ring, god help us. The leadership election could yet further divide the Conservative party too.
I have this strange feeling this is likely to be because they are isolated within the party, and want to reaffirm that they are popular with the base.
 
As others have said. IF the tories appoint a sensible candidate Sir Keir suddenly has a fight on his hands.

Depends who standing. Will their be an appetite for another cultures wars stoker within their membership, or is their a non offensive, abeit dull charachter that would be competent enough to win an election with a 20/30 seat majority?
 
To have someone in charge who is in touch with reality. It's really not a good idea having someone running the country whose only priority is himself especially at a time the country is facing a cost of living crisis made worse by government incompetence.

Do you honestly think Raab or whoever won’t try and use it as an extended job interview? Imagine Patel in charge, she’d have the English Channel mined to show how tough she is on immigration! If the 1922 committee wanted to expedite the election process they surely can? they don’t need to spend weeks or months just because that’s how it’s been done before. I don’t think Johnson can dictate his timing for going once a new leader, thus PM, has been elected.
 
it's a divided country, two-party politics means what one hates the other loves. throw in the London versus the rest, the old v young, inherited wealth v renters, expoiters v exploited, it becomes the least worse is what you are forced to choose. f'kin mess.
I think the Tories also played the workers v the work shy card very effectively.
 
Your wasting your time.
Unfortunately there are quite a few on here with the it’s my way or the highway that think just like him. They are on each and every politics thread so very easy to spot.
Fortunately they are a minority and will never be in a position of power so they are harmless really.
How dare people think about families struggling!

The utter gall of these Cunts, hey?
 
Dunno - is there a point to Dominic Raab ? Answers on a postcard to...........

that's a different question.
I could see Raab being so rabbit in headlights frozen that he wouldn't do anything nuts, and hopefully the more nuts Patel/Mogg moves would be neutered.

I don't see that keeping Johnson for months while Parliament doesn't sit is a safe move.
 
Possibly not, although there's hardly an abundance of outstanding candidates lined up to replace him. Suella Braverman and Steve Baker the first to throw their hats into the ring, god help us. The leadership election could yet further divide the Conservative party too.

Ben Wallace or Douglas Ross? A lot of the supposed big hitters are a bit too right wing to win IMHO.
 
Do you honestly think Raab or whoever won’t try and use it as an extended job interview? Imagine Patel in charge, she’d have the English Channel mined to show how tough she is on immigration! If the 1922 committee wanted to expedite the election process they surely can? they don’t need to spend weeks or months just because that’s how it’s been done before. I don’t think Johnson can dictate his timing for going once a new leader, thus PM, has been elected.
If any of those are elected PM, the chances of Labour winning at the next election increase dramatically.

Either the cost of living crisis is eased on people, or this government is toast, whoever takes over.
 
As others have said. IF the tories appoint a sensible candidate Sir Keir suddenly has a fight on his hands.

Depends who standing. Will their be an appetite for another cultures wars stoker within their membership, or is their a non offensive, abeit dull charachter that would be competent enough to win an election with a 20/30 seat majority?
Starmer can taunt them with their association with BJ in the same way BJ taunts Starmer with his links to Corbyn.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top