Marc Cucurella

  • Thread starter Thread starter ElleBla
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Kamaro011 said:
Then why we didn't go for cheaper alternative striker last season?

I mean it's the same situation isn't?, more likely all of those alternative is smoke screen. The real and only transfer target will always be Cucurella, if we don't get our target then we wait a season until next opportunity arises.

Fans will not like it but there precedent case of why there's more likely we will not look for alternatives if Cucurella transfer failed.
Click to expand...
What?

City should've gotten a striker last season or so. Tons of decent strikers out there and the reason they still came out of top was because of Pep's relentless squad. I bet, city could go on to win the league again with Cancelo as primary left back albeit the squad is much weaker than last season. Txiki paid 100 mil for Grealish too and it hasn't really set the world on fire.

Paying 30 mil or so on Paqueta as attacking mid or any mediocre winger last season would've also gotten the same if not more numbers than Grealish had put up. Simply put, grealish put up less than mediocre numbers last season for the enormous price tag.

And you are so wrong about the alternatives opinion. City are signing a left back. That's just facts and you can bookmark this message. And it's also a fact city ain't paying 50 mil for Cucurella cuz if that was the case the deal would've been wrapped up long before.
 
prealish_stan said:
What?

City should've gotten a striker last season or so. Tons of decent strikers out there and the reason they still came out of top was because of Pep's relentless squad. I bet, city could go on to win the league again with Cancelo as primary left back albeit the squad is much weaker than last season. Txiki paid 100 mil for Grealish too and it hasn't really set the world on fire.

Paying 30 mil or so on Paqueta as attacking mid or any mediocre winger last season would've also gotten the same if not more numbers than Grealish had put up. Simply put, grealish put up less than mediocre numbers last season for the enormous price tag.

And you are so wrong about the alternatives opinion. City are signing a left back. That's just facts and you can bookmark this message. And it's also a fact city ain't paying 50 mil for Cucurella cuz if that was the case the deal would've been wrapped up long before.
Click to expand...

You repeatedly say that you are telling us all ‘facts’ but the only fact involved is that you’re just guessing like everyone else - except that you don’t seem to be able to differentiate between an opinion based on nothing in particular as opposed to an actual fact.

I’ve nothing against your opinion and I don’t care less whether you’re guessing right or wrong but the way you paint your notions as facts makes me think that you being on here is something to do with the schools being on holiday.
 
prealish_stan said:
What?

City should've gotten a striker last season or so. Tons of decent strikers out there and the reason they still came out of top was because of Pep's relentless squad. I bet, city could go on to win the league again with Cancelo as primary left back albeit the squad is much weaker than last season. Txiki paid 100 mil for Grealish too and it hasn't really set the world on fire.

Paying 30 mil or so on Paqueta as attacking mid or any mediocre winger last season would've also gotten the same if not more numbers than Grealish had put up. Simply put, grealish put up less than mediocre numbers last season for the enormous price tag.

And you are so wrong about the alternatives opinion. City are signing a left back. That's just facts and you can bookmark this message. And it's also a fact city ain't paying 50 mil for Cucurella cuz if that was the case the deal would've been wrapped up long before.
Click to expand...
Much weaker if we land a proper LB? If we sign Cucurella we're not only NOT weaker, but quite a bit better...
 
Orangutans4ever said:
Thought I would join your Forum even if its only till Cucurella signs!!! Season tkt holder at Brighton for nearly 50years so sorry if I ramble on abit. Saw the likes of Lawrenson, Horton, Vicente Rodriquez pass through our club but never seen such an exciting player as Cucurella! In one season under Potter he transformed us into a watchable attacking side. What he could do for your side with the abundance of flair and quality at your disposal is quite frightening. You've signed Europes hottest property and spending £50m on our LB, LWB and sometimes CB will stick at least another 10 to 15 goals to his tally. You may not want to spend that on OUR boy but if you don't then one of the other big boys will in time to come! Not going to get caught up in the talk about Bloom but if you offer 42m and Delap on a season long loan ( who would flourish under Potter, and would come back a stronger player) then I would say good deal for all. UTA and shite on Utd.
Click to expand...
You speak too much sense to make it on this forum long term. I have a mate who is a BHA fan so I look out for yourvresults and grab a match when you are on. I agree BHA are short of a striker and believe Potter could turn Delap into a real player, the problem is I think City want to hold on to him in case Haaland “niggles” mean he is is out for any length of time and Alavarez doesn’t assimilate to the premiership immediately.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top