lust overlord
Well-Known Member
West Ham fans should be pissed, that's daylight robbery.
Neutral football fans should be pissed, absolute incompetence from the officials.
I'm sure Mark will defend this Var decision.
West Ham fans should be pissed, that's daylight robbery.
Neutral football fans should be pissed, absolute incompetence from the officials.
Shocking decision
Shocking decision
Is the "clear and obvious" criteria still used? I don't hear it mentioned anymore so I presume not. Especially as it does not sound like a clear and obvious error was made to initially award the West Ham goal thus needing a VAR review?
From the BBC
Tony Pulis
Former Stoke manager on BBC Radio 5 Live
That's not a foul. No chance. But they usually change their minds when they go the monitor - oh for goodness sake.
I thought if you were from Salford you were more likely to support Man U?
More Blues from Salford than people realise
They have just mentioned it on bein. Saying the ‘foul’ on Chelsea’s keeper was definitely not a clear and obvious error. But they would understand and accept it if van dicks would have been reviewed and a red issued.Is the "clear and obvious" criteria still used? I don't hear it mentioned anymore so I presume not. Especially as it does not sound like a clear and obvious error was made to initially award the West Ham goal thus needing a VAR review?
Until next week ;-)Doesn’t help that Mendy was pretending as well…how can the ref go and watch that, and then chalk it off?
If a keeper wipes out a player when he gets the ball, it’s ok but now this? Well, I’ve had my mini rant about VAR and officials today. Nothing else from me this season.
Obviously.....the Rag cunts don't have exclusivity.I thought if you were from Salford you were more likely to support Man U?
Could not have expressed it any better!
Do you know what “more likely” means?I thought if you were from Salford you were more likely to support Man U?