threespires
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Aug 2019
- Messages
- 8,807
- Team supported
- City
No offence (as my kids would say before they pile into me) but that shade of blue is a bit off, is it not?
No offence (as my kids would say before they pile into me) but that shade of blue is a bit off, is it not?
We are absolutely divided.Sadly looking from afar Britain seems pretty divided these days.
Brexit, the vote split the country and blame and anger rumbles on.
Monarchy, since the queen's death, it appears there is division, even this microcosm of a thread shows under 50% support for the monarchy.
Scotland, do they want out of the UK ?
Does the north south divide still exist ?
And of course everyone who's not rich hates the Tories. :)
Respect I said.You have as much of a realistic chance of being head of state as I do being the king of England ie none.
Sadly looking from afar Britain seems pretty divided these days.
Brexit, the vote split the country and blame and anger rumbles on.
Monarchy, since the queen's death, it appears there is division, even this microcosm of a thread shows under 50% support for the monarchy.
Scotland, do they want out of the UK ?
Does the north south divide still exist ?
And of course everyone who's not rich hates the Tories. :)
I'd say it is extremely fanciful myself. After 10 days relentlessly projecting the idea of an entire nation in grief now we have the notion that the funeral itself drew a line over any lingering regret people may have over burying loved ones during lockdown.
On top of that I've just seen a clip of Burley grilling some hapless Labour front bencher about whether it's appropriate for a fringe republican event to take part at their conference in 'the current' climate.
So much for moving on.
I'd say it is extremely fanciful myself. After 10 days relentlessly projecting the idea of an entire nation in grief now we have the notion that the funeral itself drew a line over any lingering regret people may have over burying loved ones during lockdown.
On top of that I've just seen a clip of Burley grilling some hapless Labour front bencher about whether it's appropriate for a fringe republican event to take part at their conference in 'the current' climate.
So much for moving on.
I'd say it is extremely fanciful myself. After 10 days relentlessly projecting the idea of an entire nation in grief now we have the notion that the funeral itself drew a line over any lingering regret people may have over burying loved ones during lockdown.
On top of that I've just seen a clip of Burley grilling some hapless Labour front bencher about whether it's appropriate for a fringe republican event to take part at their conference in 'the current' climate.
So much for moving on.
Written by Caitlin Moran. Interestingly another Caitlin Moran, an aboriginal rugby league player has had a slightly less positive take on the queen.
If it wasn't for the fact that The Queen had to bury her husband very publicly, without family, I'd say the suggestion wasn't just fanciful, but would be offensive.
Given that her husband did die during the Covid restrictions, then I can just about see the argument, if I squint, and can maybe appreciate that it was one of the few times where privilege didn't help The Queen, and that many who had to do the same will genuinely sympathise with her.
The article itself is pretty long, and a lot less serious and reverential than the tweet makes it sound.
Ultimately it doesn't make a huge difference - and not sure those two motives are mutually exclusive.It did. She was offered an exemption. She just chose not to cash those chips in.
Whether she declined it because of her duty to public service or because she felt it necessary to the preserve the institution, we can only speculate. We will never know.
I'll take your word for the rest of the piece as I haven't read it. If that's the context fair enough, it's reasonable to assume some people feel that way. Projecting that onto 'millions', as a widely shared collective experience however is something else.If it wasn't for the fact that The Queen had to bury her husband very publicly, without family, I'd say the suggestion wasn't just fanciful, but would be offensive.
Given that her husband did die during the Covid restrictions, then I can just about see the argument, if I squint, and can maybe appreciate that it was one of the few times where privilege didn't help The Queen, and that many who had to do the same will genuinely sympathise with her.
The article itself is pretty long, and a lot less serious and reverential than the tweet makes it sound.
She did it because everyone else had to stick to the rules and she was head of state and understood she should leadIt did. She was offered an exemption. She just chose not to cash those chips in.
Whether she declined it because of her duty to public service or because she felt it necessary to the preserve the institution, we can only speculate. We will never know.
No. Think she's more pissed about her aboriginal ancestors losing their land and the King's part in that.Ginger hair though. Mixed with convicts perhaps. Not still bitter about her ancestors getting sent to the other side of the world is she?
She did it because everyone else had to stick to the rules and she was head of state and understood she should lead
I don't know any over 60 who have one either! :-)People love watching the pomp, I doubt many under 60 have a royal teatowel.