It has to be secret, it needs more than two people, it needs to do harm.
So this wouldn't include Bigga's plan to bore the forum with circular arguments and talk like a white British boy pretending to be an East Coast African American.
That’s obviously not secret and "two or more" doesn't include multiple personalities, nor does mild to moderate annoyance qualify as harm.
If a Pres/ Gov is vocal of a plan that happens, that's more than "two people". So if a pipeline is destroyed after a Pres says something will happen to it, is it factual or conspiracy? There's no proof other than words stated before actions made.
You know exactly zero about me if the demographic you describe is your assumption. You should just end the talk and do yourself a favour.
Yes, you are indeed an idiot who will argue against even basic definitions that are easy to understand.
Reading comprehension isn't your strong point. I'll spell it out for you, your language on here is affected, as if you are trying to raise your visibility so you can continue the pity party because the mob are just racists. You "speak" like a semi-literate toilet attendant.
Bit unfair, the ‘freshen up’ guys are generally likeable, witty, fragrant and far more successful.Reading comprehension isn't your strong point. I'll spell it out for you, your language on here is affected, as if you are trying to raise your visibility so you can continue the pity party because the mob are just racists. You "speak" like a semi-literate toilet attendant.
Being a horrible bitch.Marjorie Taylor Green served with divorce papers last week.
Wonder what the grounds are?
Marjorie Taylor Green served with divorce papers last week.
Wonder what the grounds are?
Married a woman who turned into looking like a bloke probablyMarjorie Taylor Green served with divorce papers last week.
Wonder what the grounds are?
Irreconcilable differences.Marjorie Taylor Green served with divorce papers last week.
Wonder what the grounds are?
Further developments...
Maybe the photographic evidence and some deleted social media videos of him watching it might be the giveaway on that one...?I see Trump told Haberman that he was in a meeting when the Capitol was attacked, and didn't have the TV on, so he only heard about it later. Obviously he fumbled the statement he was clearly trying to invent on the spot.
This seems to contradict the other statements made by others that they were watching it all the time, even ignoring the idea that he wouldn't be interrupted to be told.
Now I wonder which one is true.
Who does this **** remind me of?
It's those pesky space lasers again."Marjorie Taylor Greene's husband has filed for divorce. MTG released a statement saying it's all the Jews fault..."
Beats me. I suppose that the shirt caption is a hint.... nope, I'm still puzzled... I'll need a bigga clue.