Shamima Begum

Alan Harper's Tash said:
I asked because you were suggesting her father face consequences for taking her on them.

If it isn’t against the law, then the answer is that he shouldn’t.

That was my only reason for asking the question.
Click to expand...
Not for that but it was suggested earlier that consequences for the groomers rather than her.
As Bigga says speculating it would look like her father started the grooming.
 
hedkandi said:
Not for that but it was suggested earlier that consequences for the groomers rather than her.
As Bigga says speculating it would look like her father started the grooming.
Click to expand...
Maybe so, but if it is merely speculation, then it won’t lead to a conviction in all likelihood.

Who knows though, the government seem to make the rules up as they like at the moment.

The U.K. will be better off when they have a decent attorney general again.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
Maybe so, but if it is merely speculation, then it won’t lead to a conviction in all likelihood.

Who knows though, the government seem to make the rules up as they like at the moment.

The U.K. will be better off when they have a decent attorney general again.
Click to expand...
Uk will be better off when we have a better attorney general and a whole host of other officials !!
 
Bigga said:
Point proven and doubt, very much, he'd retract his own speculation.

They all look the same anyway could be the next assumption...
Click to expand...

Good point they all wore glasses :)


F1FBA3F9-3D9E-4BBE-B316-083438972766_w1080_h608.jpg
 
BerkshireBlue said:
She's committed the biggest crime you can, treason against the country and I don't use that word lightly. her options should be stay where she is or come back for the punishment and we all know what that punishment is. The punishment is what it is for a reason
Click to expand...
How is going to Syria to fight the Syrian government (if that was what it was) treason against Britain?
It's somebody going abroad to fight a foreign war. Thousands of Brits have done that throughout recent history on various sides. The difference this time was that she chose a side the British government didn't approve of
Still doesn't make it treason.
 
Mr Kobayashi said:
So convict her and imprison her instead of making her stateless and making her someone else's problem?
Click to expand...
Absolutely, it was a racist act in as much as can you imagine the uproar if a white kid had done the same thing as Shamima and not been allowed back into the country?
It never would have happened. The only reason was that she was of first or second generation foreign extraction so was an easy target for the government to do some shameless populist grandstanding.
An utterly shameful act and not ever in my name.
 
goalmole said:
Absolutely, it was a racist act in as much as can you imagine the uproar if a white kid had done the same thing as Shamima and not been allowed back into the country?
It never would have happened. The only reason was that she was of first or second generation foreign extraction so was an easy target for the government to do some shameless populist grandstanding.
An utterly shameful act and not ever in my name.
Click to expand...

Jack Letts - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

They did do the same thing to Jack Letts (a former dual national of Canada) and convicted his mother and father of sending money to fund terrorism.
 
Bigga said:
No... You prompted the father as the groomer and I said 'that would be speculation' as in you're just guessing at anything.
Click to expand...
Bigga said:
No... You prompted the father as the groomer and I said 'that would be speculation' as in you're just guessing at anything.
Click to expand...
Guessing at anything!! if I am you are too.

You are guessing at her motives, regrets and beliefs.
Maybe we all take a step back as we dont know many things about what is going on.

Doubt if you will tho.
 
goalmole said:
Absolutely, it was a racist act in as much as can you imagine the uproar if a white kid had done the same thing as Shamima and not been allowed back into the country?
It never would have happened. The only reason was that she was of first or second generation foreign extraction so was an easy target for the government to do some shameless populist grandstanding.
An utterly shameful act and not ever in my name.
Click to expand...
Is it fuck racist, as for you calling her “Shamima” and “not ever in my name” give your head a wobble, she’s a no mark nothing, as she deserves to be, and I doubt you’re that important for anyone to equate you in this case.

Try getting sympathy of the family and friends of the Manchester bombing, you know the one, the atrocity where she had no sympathy for the victims, she’s a ****, end of.
 
hedkandi said:
M

Admit I was wrong.

The exposure at an early age was there by family friends tho.
Click to expand...

Do you actually know that they had met, or have confirmed reports of family friends doing that?

Otherwise it is just an assumption to support your prejudice that conservative muslims are "sleepers" for terrorism.
 
hammocity said:
Is it fuck racist, as for you calling her “Shamima” and “not ever in my name” give your head a wobble, she’s a no mark nothing, as she deserves to be, and I doubt you’re that important for anyone to equate you in this case.

Try getting sympathy of the family and friends of the Manchester bombing, you know the one, the atrocity where she had no sympathy for the victims, she’s a ****, end of.
Click to expand...
Being a **** isn’t a criminal conviction, sadly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top