Unpopular opinions

Mr Kobayashi said:
He also had animal porn on his laptop.

Given the opportunity do you think he wouldn't have gone for a girl of a younger age?

Nonce doesn't mean paedo, it used as in insult for all sex offenders.
Click to expand...
He did. Not sure that makes him a paedo.

I don’t know. Do you?

The two terms are interchangeable in modern vernacular, so fuck off with your distortions. You knew what I meant.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
He did. Not sure that makes him a paedo.

I don’t know. Do you?

The two terms are interchangeable in modern vernacular, so fuck off with your distortions. You knew what I meant.
Click to expand...

Depends on how old the animals were.

It suggests he isn't particularly fussy, it's not something he could have stumbled upon or downloaded by accident.

Perhaps he was more turned on by the depravity than the younger female form.

This girl was a regular at the stadium waiting for pics etc, had she been 2-3 years younger I doubt it would have made much difference to his thought process. I can't say for certain either way, but he doesnt deserve the benefit of the doubt.
 
Mr Kobayashi said:
This girl was a regular at the stadium waiting for pics etc, had she been 2-3 years younger I doubt it would have made much difference to his thought process. I can't say for certain either way, but he doesnt deserve the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...
The law says everyone deserves the benefit of the doubt. And has done since the 18th century. I’m sorry you don’t feel that should be the starting point.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
The law says everyone deserves the benefit of the doubt. And has done since the 18th century. I’m sorry you don’t feel that should be the starting point.
Click to expand...

As you are fully aware there isn't actually a crime of being a paedophile.

You can be a paedophile (sexually attracted to children or turned on by them being abused) and not commit a criminal act.

As there aren't any allegations that he ever did touch children that age, there isn't anything to prejudge.

But I'm entitled to think him a wrong un who would have gone there if the opportunity arose.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
The law says everyone deserves the benefit of the doubt. And has done since the 18th century. I’m sorry you don’t feel that should be the starting point.
Click to expand...
Not quite what the law says, but I get what you mean.
The onus is on the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defence doesn’t have to prove anything. The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
Stephen230 said:
His “England is for white people” rant was many things but to give him his dues it wasn’t boring.
Click to expand...
No need to keep dragging that up mate, he was very young and has apologized lots of times and done a lot of charity work in places like Jamaica.
He has also always made sure that black artists who wrote blues songs got their royalties. (unlike some mega rich Rock stars)
 
mancity2012_eamo said:
Not quite what the law says, but I get what you mean.
The onus is on the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defence doesn’t have to prove anything. The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...

Amounts to pretty much the same thing but I think the “beyond reasonable doubt” thing was replaced with “satisfied that you are sure” a few years ago.
 
mancity2012_eamo said:
Not quite what the law says, but I get what you mean.
The onus is on the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defence doesn’t have to prove anything. The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Click to expand...
The legal test is now being ‘sure’ but it amounts to the same thing as ‘beyond reasonable doubt‘.
 
Bill Walker said:
No need to keep dragging that up mate, he was very young and has apologized lots of times and done a lot of charity work in places like Jamaica.
He has also always made sure that black artists who wrote blues songs got their royalties. (unlike some mega rich Rock stars)
Click to expand...

I’m sure he won’t lose any sleep, or money, over me mentioning it on a football website.

I wouldn’t describe a person in their 30s as been “very young” either.
 
Bill Walker said:
Are you sure ?

‘I will never find love after what he did to me': Woman who was raped aged ten by Gary Glitter reveals she wept after learning of the pop paedophile's imminent release from prison after just eight years behind bars​

  • Former pop star Gary Glitter, 78, was jailed for 16 years but is set to be released
  • His crimes included sex with a girl, 13, and attempting to rape a 8-year-old child
  • Ms D, who spoke to the Mail on Sunday, was only ten when Glitter abused her
Click to expand...

We weren't talking about Gary Glitter.
 
Bill Walker said:
It's been mentioned a few times recently on bluemoon.

What do you gain by mentioning it ?
Click to expand...

I’ve not seen it on here before but I’m happy for it to be mentioned every time his name is.

If the guidelines on here were only post things that you stand to gain something by, the only posts on here would be people begging for spare briefs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top