gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
…the only substantial thing this country still has to be legitimately proud of?
I've had quite a lot of unfiltered access of the army recently and I'd suggest you don't have to be a sexist, racist, generally offensive, right wing c*nt to get on, but it sure does help.…the only substantial thing this country still has to be legitimately proud of?
That’s really sad to hear, but being racist doesn’t necessarily render someone to be irredeemably bad. Racism is illogical, unwarranted and wrong. But so are lots of things. Doesn’t necessarily mean that a racist person is poisonous or malign. Life is far more complicated than that. Four legs good, two legs bad?I've had quite a lot of unfiltered access of the army recently and I'd suggest you don't have to be a sexist, racist, generally offensive, right wing c*nt to get on, but it sure does help.
So, unfortunately it's a no from me.
I'm not suggesting every individual in the army is inherently bad. I'm suggesting that, while there are many things that we could applaud about the army, the overall culture was shocking in the amount of prejudice.That’s really sad to hear, but being racist doesn’t necessarily render someone to be irredeemably bad. Racism is illogical, unwarranted and wrong. But so are lots of things. Doesn’t necessarily mean that a racist person is poisonous or malign. Life is far more complicated than that. Four legs good, two legs bad?
The armed forces are drawn from the society they serve and reflect it's values and culture. What you are angsty about is a British young men issue rather than an army issue.I'm not suggesting every individual in the army is inherently bad. I'm suggesting that, while there are many things that we could applaud about the army, the overall culture was shocking in the amount of prejudice.
While I wouldn't be quick to judge a 16 year old from Stoke, the culture is passed down from the more senior members, who should definitely know better. This was also in situations where they were supposed to be on their very best behaviour, and it would have been made very clear to them in advance that they were representing the army to the public.
Not at all - This is a culture that is coming from the older and more senior members. Many are highly educated, and often from privileged backgrounds. And again, this isn't candid, behind the scenes stuff - this is in front of civilians, knowing they're on show.The armed forces are drawn from the society they serve and reflect it's values and culture. What you are angsty about is a British young men issue rather than an army issue.
Can’t disagree with any of that, but I still think we should be overall proud of our military. It defends humane values across the globe and generally plays by the rules. It is still (relatively) well run. It is not institutionally corrupt. It is truly world leading in what it does.I'm not suggesting every individual in the army is inherently bad. I'm suggesting that, while there are many things that we could applaud about the army, the overall culture was shocking in the amount of prejudice.
While I wouldn't be quick to judge a 16 year old from Stoke, the culture is passed down from the more senior members, who should definitely know better. This was also in situations where they were supposed to be on their very best behaviour, and it would have been made very clear to them in advance that they were representing the army to the public.
I think you may be slightly out of date. Policy on racism and homophobia is pretty clear and it's zero tolerance. The RAF for example is one of stonewalls top employers, and the army is the most racially diverse of all three services.Not at all - This is a culture that is coming from the older and more senior members. Many are highly educated, and often from privileged backgrounds. And again, this isn't candid, behind the scenes stuff - this is in front of civilians, knowing they're on show.
I realise that it's a very different job, but young British men who worked for Sainsbury's wouldn't expect their superiors to be openly racist, sexist, homophobic etc. Given that the levels of control and pride they're expected to take in things like how shiny their shoes are, it would not be beyond the bounds of possibility for them to follow the lead of those telling them what to do when it came to their attitudes being a little more modern. If anything, you'd think it would be easier, given these young people are expected to jump through whatever hoops are put before them.
This was in 2022.I think you may be slightly out of date. Policy on racism and homophobia is pretty clear and it's zero tolerance. The RAF for example is one of stonewalls top employers, and the army is the most racially diverse of all three services.
Zero tolerance should be expected as in every other place of work though. Doesn’t mean people are playing by the rulesI think you may be slightly out of date. Policy on racism and homophobia is pretty clear and it's zero tolerance. The RAF for example is one of stonewalls top employers, and the army is the most racially diverse of all three services.
If nobody complains it effectively didn't happen...........This was in 2022.
No, just like any other place of work. Therefore the army is no different and is a reflection of wider society.Zero tolerance should be expected as in every other place of work though. Doesn’t mean people are playing by the rules
Would you say that the army is an organisation which encourages young recruits to question and challenge their superiors?If nobody complains it effectively didn't happen...........